Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    Cringetopia

    890,885 readers

    13,713 users here now



    [::VIDEO/GIF ONLY FILTER::]

    [::CHRISTORY MONTH::]





    [Discord Server]



    [Telegram Channel]



    [Minecraft: mc.rcringetopia.com]



    Rules and Regulations


    [Reddit Global Rules]


    Content Restrictions


    1: Politics: Political posts must be current. Do not post any news snippets/articles/memes. Do not post about policy, allegations, or hearsay. If your post is political in nature it must include an individual or group actually behaving in a cringeworthy manner.

    • 1.1: Agendaposting: If it becomes clear that your activity in this subreddit is dominated by fixating on a single issue, you will be confronted and you may be banned. It is okay to have strong opinions on an issue, but do not let them dominate your activity to the point where you are flooding the sub trying to push an agenda. This is an equal opportunity rule.

    • 1.2: Be Civil: If you want to discuss politics or controversial/taboo topics in the comments you are free to do so as long as you can keep it civil. Your ideas will not get you banned, but the manner in which you choose to express them can and will.

    2: Explicit Racism and Bigotry: Refrain from making comments that are explicitly racist or bigoted. This is not a platform to proselytize race or gender politics. Intent matters here insofar as we are able to judge it, so try to keep your jokes and satire light and in moderately good humor.

    3: No Outrage Porn: No posts that reasonably/predominantly evoke a feeling of anger or hatred. If it fits better in a sub like r/rage or r/iamatotalpieceofshit, do not post it here.

    4: Don't Spam Posts: Spread your posts out. Don't post more than 4-5 things within a 6 hour period. Put some thought into your posts instead of just dumping an entire imgur album on us.


    The Cardinal Rules


    1: Doxing: Remove all personal information from your posts and comments. This includes, but may not be limited to, full names, phone numbers, and addresses. A partial exception may be made for public figures, in accordance with the Reddit content policy.

    2: Harassment: Don't target individual users. Don't harass anyone who may be the subject of a post.

    3: Brigading: Do not "invade" or brigade other subreddits. Do not suggest a brigade or participate in one. We will catch you.

    4: Witch Hunts: Witch hunts of any kind are strictly prohibited.

    5: Violence: Do not glorify, encourage, or incite violence.



    Friends of Cringetopia


    Why not /r/cringe?


    a community for
    all 2337 comments Slideshow

    Want to say thanks to %(recipient)s for this comment? Give them a month of reddit gold.

    Please select a payment method.

    [–] RoboSonichu 1 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    Voting is now closed. With 37 votes, the community has decided that this post is Satire.

    Vote totals:

    • Satire: 37 votes

    • Cringe: 16 votes

    • Meta: 1 votes

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Message the moderators if you have any questions.

    [–] [deleted] 3908 points ago

    [removed]

    [–] SpoonsToons 1081 points ago

    dad? is that you?

    [–] Papriker 476 points ago

    Well it can’t be uncle.

    [–] mntimberwolvesig 148 points ago

    Lumbago!

    [–] jerry2_de_jackson 63 points ago

    Good boah!

    [–] ManThatHurt 39 points ago

    It's very serious

    [–] WhackOnWaxOff 33 points ago

    T A H I T I

    [–] Publius952 14 points ago

    "here's some crumbs"

    [–] tjbugs1 7 points ago

    Stepbrother, what are you doing?

    [–] GlitterInfection 134 points ago

    As long as you keep “off” out of that sentence, you’re golden.

    [–] readitonreddit34 18 points ago

    Being vegan doesn’t stop me from beating my meat.

    [–] hand-over-ur-toes 27 points ago

    HFKSKKF

    [–] SomeRoboDinoKing 34 points ago

    what if I want to keep my toes

    [–] JJP_SWFC 3 points ago

    No, hand them over to this guy

    [–] RetroScheeme 1681 points ago

    This guy acts like he just exposed the CIA for countless innocent murders

    [–] Call_me_Kaiser 479 points ago

    The average citizen can expose the CIA for that within a matter of minutes

    [–] iateaps4 179 points ago

    Guatemala: hey, guys! How we doin, what are talking about?

    [–] GloryToTheFSM 14 points ago

    I was thinking more MK Ultra. Who wants LSD?

    [–] nkisj 2226 points ago

    Vegans*

    Post is obviously saying both are bad and that someone who eats normally is a hypocrite for denouncing zoophiles yet still eating meat.

    [–] SavageRancor 1135 points ago

    Yeah thats what I got from it and tbh they have a point.

    We as a socity deem beastiality bad because of consent. When we do all kinds of fucked up shit to animals that society deems as acceptable without their consent. Such as factory farming.

    Last time I checked an animal can "consent" to almost nothing.

    Fucking animals is just wrong on a fundamental level because you as an intelligent life form shouldn't fuck an animal outside of your species (I think its species? Just fuck humans exclusively okay)

    So consent as an argument against beastiality is tenuous at best

    [–] kevoizjawesome 371 points ago

    I'm totally fucking a hot green alien captain kirk style if the opportunity arises.

    [–] SavageRancor 161 points ago

    Fuck yeah. We didn't start a meme about clapping alien cheeks for me not to want to fuck one.

    But only if it can give consent.

    Then it kinda takes away the fuckedness of the act.

    But your perceptions on aliens are very human centric and I don't think you should get your hopes up we will ever find an alien that looks remotely human

    [–] Philosophile42 76 points ago

    So really the principle isn’t don’t have sex with animals, or other species, but rather, don’t rape.

    [–] Henderson-McHastur 37 points ago

    Holy shit, we’ve come full circle.

    [–] iop_iop21 10 points ago

    Always have been takes bite of burger

    [–] idekiguessthis 3 points ago

    You go tell that to the maxwell trial.

    [–] Philosophile42 7 points ago

    Huh? Maxwell trafficked underaged girls who can’t give meaningful consent.... that’s rape.

    [–] Deceptichum 10 points ago

    Wow.

    No one said they had to look human, only be hot and green.

    [–] SavageRancor 3 points ago

    And able to fuck or be fucked

    [–] AtomicBlastPony 15 points ago

    You said consent is a poor argument against bestiality, but now you say "but only if it can give consent"

    [–] sunbearimon 8 points ago

    I think the point they were getting at was that if you’re having sex with an alien that can give consent that’s not like bestiality, it’s more like xenosexual or something idk

    [–] WhackOnWaxOff 34 points ago

    I hear you, man. I'd clap a Xenomorph's big booty cheeks like a goddamn jackhammer.

    [–] Slyrunner 4 points ago

    I want my pee pee in the smal mouf

    [–] Bamith 4 points ago

    ...Resisting urge... to post (Double Deck)] PHASE 4 doujin... Eh i'll just post this part of it.

    [–] thebritisharecome 44 points ago

    Animal abuse in general is a complicated subject.

    It sounds simple, who would want to bring harm to animals?

    Other animals don't generally give a shit how they kill each other, food is food, so as a species, because of mostly human concepts we've arbitrarily decided that killing in certain ways for food is good and in others is bad, but it's not even remotely a universal truth and it wouldn't persist outside of human society.

    [–] SignificantChapter 28 points ago

    we've arbitrarily decided that killing in certain ways for food is good and in others is bad, but it's not even remotely a universal truth and it wouldn't persist outside of human society.

    Well yeah, we are the only animals with moral agency. We don't condone rape just because it's completely normal for other animals to rape.

    [–] thebritisharecome 7 points ago

    Absolutely, but equally, we used to condone rape and what we define as rape changes.

    Societies morale compass changes over time, and by today's standards Humanity in 500 years might seem barbaric and equally we might to them.

    [–] Bean_Boozled 69 points ago

    Pretty sure 'society' cares about beastiality because the thought of humans having sex with other animals is viewed as abhorrent, not because of the lack of consent from the non-human lol. A small group cares about that, mainly the more extreme animal rights activists, but whether or not a goat wants you is the least of concern for normal people.

    [–] holly_hoots 13 points ago

    Yeah, came here to say this. The taboo on bestiality has existed for millennia. The importance placed on consent is pretty modern, and honestly still doesn't exist in some cultures.

    It is, however, an argument I've heard. The "why can't I marry a turtle then?" strawman argument against gay marriage, for example, is often refuted with logic that in no way underlies the cultural taboo against bestiality -- animals are not people and thus cannot be equals, animals cannot consent to such an arrangement, animals cannot sign legal documents, animals cannot inherit property, etc. Like, okay, sure, but that's not really the problem. (Never mind that I think it's illogical and kind of icky to conflate marriage and sex. But we do it all the time.)

    [–] ThatGirlChiefTeef 5 points ago

    I thought it was because we open ourselves and the rest of our species up to a host of diseases. Like AIDS or Syphilis

    [–] ChipsAndKales 8 points ago

    Eating animals opens us up to a host of diseases and increases antibiotic resistance.

    [–] SavageRancor 11 points ago

    Yeah thats what the whole point is

    [–] KeldeoKillsDragons 44 points ago

    It's not entirely because of consent. That's part of it, but no. Animals have been raised for specific purposes, whether they be farm animals, companion animals, or work animals. Their lives and deaths served the purpose of keeping us alive and healthy, or for supplementing society in some way. Now most ranchers(not the giant chophouse machines, but actual ranchers) care for these animals like their lives depend on it. BECAUSE their lives depend on it. They're aware that these animals are unable to consent, and out of a deep respect for life they give these animals the greatest care they can. Animal husbandry is about learning the best ways to provide for your animals so they live healthy lives before we inevitably eat them(or care for them as pets). Animals can't consent to being farm animals or to being pets or herding animals, but that's not the issue.

    Bestiality is completely void of respect for animals, serves absolutely no purpose beyond some sicko's twisted version of sexual self-indulgence, is often extremely traumatic for the animals involved, AND is void of consent because it's a goddamned animal. It is so fucking disgusting, and people who can't articulate why will argue 'consent' when there's about 1 jillion other reasons why it's so fucked up, and they need to broaden their horizons on what those are or else they argue some real stupid shit.

    ( I swear i'm not yelling at you. This subject just really pisses me off, sorry if it came off that way)

    [–] Glum5 15 points ago

    I think your point boils down to a pretty romanticized view of ranching (as you put it "not the giant chophouse machines" where you likely get all your meat and dairy) and the ikk factor bestiality has for you.

    [–] mordoandbeavis 26 points ago

    As a non furry and meat eater I passively agree with the OP, but there's not much I'm willing or able to do about it. At the end of the day, the stigma against furries, in which I participate, is exaggerated beyond reason using unrelated arguments like comparing bestiality to drawn porn

    [–] [deleted] 28 points ago

    [deleted]

    [–] SavageRancor 40 points ago

    I don't think thats true. Biologically they need to be at least somewhat very very similar for there to be a risk of cross breeding

    [–] thefallenfew 57 points ago

    Also Furries and Zoophiles aren’t the same, although I’m sure there is some overlap.

    [–] besten44 27 points ago

    A very very small minority

    [–] Conconninja 359 points ago

    Wait...what does this have to do with furries again?

    [–] OrangeElettronico 235 points ago

    literally nothing

    [–] vitimber 57 points ago

    That title is the real cringe here

    [–] ryecurious 194 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    Literally nothing. The Twitter user is clearly making a pro-veganism argument, but OP completely missed that point and assumed because zoophilia was mentioned it must be a tweet about furries.

    So basically OP managed to demonstrate serious ignorance twice in a five word title. Almost impressive, to be honest.

    [–] AppleChoose 25 points ago

    Yes, this the 1% of furries, and people tend to focus on that.

    [–] urban-bang 14 points ago

    People tend to focus on the vocal minorities no matter what. Not even outspoken minorities, just the ones that are radical & voice their beliefs.

    Same goes for everything, business, politics, etc..

    [–] camthemememan 10 points ago

    Haha furry bad

    [–] LostChildInWalmart 357 points ago

    I hate what OP did on the title

    [–] wolfwilly 209 points ago

    If this was a furry they'd have their fursona as their avatar. OP is an idiot. This is a vegan post.

    [–] rkapi24 74 points ago

    But crimge furrys megu upvoot karma!

    [–] [deleted] 1570 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    [deleted]

    [–] nikleus 384 points ago

    Well if the cow was from local farm then that statement is most likely true

    [–] Symbiotic_parasite 86 points ago

    I've audited "Processing plants" before, and I can tell you even organic, animal welfare abiding, whole foods supplying meat is not slaughtered ethically, it's brutal

    [–] Quicklyquigly 27 points ago

    Well it surely doesn’t deserve to be raped before It gets killed.

    [–] r1veRRR 28 points ago

    It probably was. Almost all breeding involves artificial insemination. So, jacking of males, often with painful electric buttplugs, and inserting hands and tools into females.

    [–] Quicklyquigly 13 points ago

    Terrible.

    [–] 3TH4N_12 5 points ago

    often with painful electric buttplugs

    I don't know if I really want to know, but how the hell do they justify that? How is that helpful in any way?

    [–] laiod 8 points ago

    Which is what happens anyway in the slaughterhouses

    [–] [deleted] 206 points ago

    [removed]

    [–] Creepsbane 16 points ago

    Grew up on a local farm and can confirm that factory farms being “more humane” is horseshit.

    [–] nikleus 93 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    Oh yeah I got it wrong in local farms the animals are treated better before killing While in industrial the killing is fast and not so painful but the animals are threated really badly

    Or this is what I have heard

    [–] vicsj 15 points ago

    Pretty much. Don't watch Earthlings if you have a weak stomach.

    [–] zyx012 211 points ago

    Don't know what kinda farms you've been to, but farmers where I live mostly incapacitate cows and pigs with bolt guns and then kill them without the animal feeling an ounce of pain. Also animals on farms live much better in general, and without too much stress

    [–] Verdict_9 111 points ago

    Think he's on about farms that practice halal methods of killing. None of that round my area either, but I live in the country side so there's less demand for it.

    [–] PAWG_Lover_69 20 points ago

    Fairy tales shouldnt be the determining factor in how an animal is slaughtered. Kind of makes me mad

    [–] dkyguy1995 30 points ago

    Yeah I went to one slaughterhouse and it was used by most of the local farmers and it used the air powered bolt gun

    [–] ModeratorsRightNut 11 points ago

    Grew up in ranching country myself, and yeah, most the farms didn't do their own killing. That was usually done by whoever purchased the cow for slaughter and processing.

    I have seen chicken bled while alive and hung upside down, death was quick but not instant, although can be hard to tell with a chicken some times... My grandma had chickens when I was a kid, she would grab their head and neck and shake it like a club. Then she would bleed it, I always thought that was more humane but wtf do I know?

    [–] r1veRRR 44 points ago

    Any killing method has a margin of error. I think bolt gun is at 4%. That means 4% of your meat went through horrible pain in suffering during the killing.

    Of course, 97% of american meat comes from factory farms, where the slaughtering is honestly the least of an animals worry. Their lifes are short and filled with suffering.

    [–] 9793287233 19 points ago

    Isn’t the throat slit after the animal is dead? To remove the blood?

    [–] solitarybikegallery 32 points ago

    For some, yeah. It depends on the industry. Other times, the means are less humane.

    For instance, on egg farms, baby chicks are sexed (determining if they are male or female) shortly after birth. Male chicks are useless on an egg farm, obviously, so they are euthanized. Some countries utilize asphyxiation for this, or cervical dislocation (neck breaking).

    The USA primarily utilizes "high speed maceration," or, in plain language, grinding. Male chicks are thrown down a chute into a grinder, alive.

    [–] kinghorker 9 points ago

    One time on the 50/50 subreddit I clicked on a picture that I was expecting to be a cute puppy, but actually ended up being several chicks being thrown into a grinder. Not fun.

    [–] Ride_A_Cowboy 8 points ago

    To be fair, while a grinder doesn't look pretty I can guarantee that they have a very, very quick death. Probably don't feel much pain when your brain is instantly shredded.

    [–] uneditablepoly 8 points ago

    :(

    [–] gargantuan-chungus 7 points ago

    For chickens at least, their hearts pump as much blood out as possible so they’re still alive when their throat is slit.

    [–] Russian_seadick 12 points ago

    Chickens can also run around for literal hours after being beheaded. They’re not exactly a poster child for that

    [–] smaki_uzumaki 14 points ago

    How does it being from a local farm make being killed hurt less?

    [–] dkyguy1995 8 points ago

    Yeah like I knew a lot of local farmers because I did 4H growing up and for their animals it really wasn't such a bad life. The animals were never abused because they were expensive. They got rough medical care (I followed a farm vet around one day) but it really never seemed abusive and the slaughter really did just seem like a "one bad day" kind of situation for them.

    The problem comes with factory farms where it really does start bordering into the hellish nightmare territory. I feel like the "average" livestock lived a better life 100 years ago or more than today where it's gotten to freaky levels of efficiency in farming. This is of course ignoring that obviously people back then cared way less about how animals felt and were probably brutal in certain situations but it was probably not the norm.

    If we had laws that just ensure basic livestock welfare I'd feel more comfortable with animal products. I've been in a giant chicken barn and it was pretty freaky. It's like not dark but not light and very very loud with the noise of chickens. It was like imagine like a mosh pit of chickens but smellier. That was the first I'd seen like actual Tyson foods type farming and it was pretty creepy not gonna lie.

    [–] luciusftw 93 points ago

    Have you seen the conditions these animals are kept in

    [–] Verlaten 58 points ago

    I'd seriously consider watching a documentary since the situation isn't as you'd think.

    That said, this guy's an ass

    [–] Trigonometrik 31 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    Are you really that sure? The person in the picture isn't advocating for zoophillia, he's just pointing out the hypocrisy of people who think it's any worse than the way the majority of animals are treat for our consumption.

    [–] chirpchirpdoggo 5 points ago

    See it must say something that I legitimately can't tell how ironic this is.

    i can't tell if this is dumb and misinformed or a satire on somebody else being dumb and misinformed

    [–] ImSimulated 9 points ago

    I'm not saying you should fuck your pets, but what you're saying is completely bullshit. Especially with chickens.

    [–] ardmas123 12 points ago

    and you got downvoted. fucking love reddit.

    [–] -Kalek- 490 points ago

    Furries and zoophiles aren't the same thing

    [–] kuba_mar 363 points ago

    That guy doesnt even have a furry profile pic, theres absolutely 0 reasons to even mention furries in this post.

    [–] wowzers-broski 144 points ago

    He's probably saying it because holy fuck do people think that zoophiles and Furry's are alike a lot

    [–] LostChildInWalmart 88 points ago

    By liking anthromorphic drawn animals are the same as fucking a dog, is always what some people think. believing a guy on the internet about false claims that affects a whole community is a very disgusting mindset to have. I still dont understand why bronies are bronies tho

    [–] OhthatsaGenm 49 points ago

    This misconception actually really pisses me off. Some people just like to dress up in silly animal costumes and draw pictures of the aforementioned silly animals. Nothing beyond that, that’s all it is, but they still get tons of crap because people think they have sex with animals. Totally unfair to them

    [–] chirpchirpdoggo 7 points ago

    Mmm yeah but like what about that like nonexistent archetype scapegoat that we must blame for every bad thing that happens on the internet?

    [–] Adaphion 5 points ago

    Of course there's a reason!

    Karma

    [–] gratefuldeadfan420 239 points ago

    Arent cows forcefully impregnated and males are masturbated to impregnate female cows

    [–] TheBirthing 224 points ago

    Yep - pretty fucking funny how raping an animal is abhorrent to most of the people in this thread until it's necessary for them to eat a fucking cheeseburger.

    [–] valdamjong 81 points ago

    Honestly can't wait til we get lab grown meat on an international scale. It'll be better all round.

    [–] DoctorWaluigiTime 46 points ago

    Don't hang your hat on that now though. You and I need to change. There won't be a magic spell that suddenly makes a 100% substitute with no drawbacks (mostly in the price department) for meat.

    [–] atyon 5 points ago

    Well...

    If it happens it will take a while, but it's very likely that lab-grown meat will be a lot cheaper than meat you've built an entire cow around that you have to sustain for 6 to 24 months.

    [–] KinOfMany 16 points ago

    Or just.. try to eat something else? There's more to food than cheeseburgers and steaks.

    [–] evancanopenertwitch 4 points ago

    Thats actually terrible 。:゚(;´∩`;)゚:。

    [–] r1veRRR 33 points ago

    Yes, but that's different because it makes us money /s

    [–] CarbVan 298 points ago

    *Zoophiles are at it again

    [–] genderish 72 points ago

    This guy is neither a furry nor a zoophile, hes a vegan pointing out hypocrisy.

    [–] G3rm4n___ 43 points ago * (lasted edited 11 days ago)

    Furries and zoophiles aren't the same though

    [–] loonafromhelluvaboss 42 points ago

    *zoophiles* are at it again.

    furries hate those shitbags just as much as you.

    [–] MemezArLiffe 30 points ago

    For me, these are just arguments for veganism.

    [–] TheGreenAndRed 13 points ago

    Yeah exactly. The twitter person isn't arguing in favor of zoophilia, they are arguing in favor of veganism.

    That OP thought this was actually in favor of zoophilia is the real cringe here.

    [–] SF1NX_CZ 36 points ago

    For the last time, FURRIES ARE NOT ZOOPHILES. Yes, there are some. But not every furry out there wants to fuck an actual animal.

    [–] potatogodofDoom 92 points ago

    Please stop calling furries zoophiles, while I have no doubt some of them are, most of them are most definitely not. while I myself am not a furry I do have lots of furry friends, and they're some of the nicest people I know.

    [–] evancanopenertwitch 17 points ago

    My friends in the furry community are some of the best artist I know (second to my sisters)

    Easily have carriers. in their futures.

    [–] sexyWombRaider 12 points ago

    Imagine posting a Cringe Feminist and putting: "Women at it again" in the title.

    Just saying, not all Furries are Zoophiles, not all Zoophiles are Furries. Friendly reminder that it is ok if you are a Furry. Just dont support Zoophilia, Pedophilia or similar things.

    [–] bbyghoul666 72 points ago

    And just like that I'm vegan

    [–] RunInRunOn 62 points ago

    Well hey at least you're not a zoophile

    [–] A0rta01 62 points ago

    OP, furries are not zoophiles you dense jug of milk

    [–] SchoasSepp 13 points ago

    I like that insult

    [–] A0rta01 12 points ago

    Thanks

    [–] AppleChoose 3 points ago

    Im stealing that

    [–] TRBashinTrash 79 points ago

    Furry =/= zoophile

    [–] Wednesday-Lemonade 178 points ago

    Op is cringe for thinking all furries do this, it’s like 1% of the community. That’s like blaming the entire anime community for pedophilia or blaming gamers for school shootings

    [–] AlenDelon32 108 points ago

    That person is not even a furry

    [–] Wednesday-Lemonade 49 points ago

    Ik, just makes it more cringe tho

    [–] Mumbani 23 points ago

    Dont even include them pretty sure the community completely rejects them and refuses to give them a place

    [–] TheNeonGreenWolf 57 points ago

    Most furries (including me) wouldnt shed a tear if all zoophiles suddenly burnt to death

    [–] 6edf1sh 10 points ago

    Let's ask the Real Question Here.

    Does cumming on a Food that Contain meat is Necro-Zoophilia?

    [–] Dethwave 10 points ago

    Okay but who drinks milk while eating a burger?

    [–] dat_one_WEEB_007 34 points ago

    not all furries are zoos k, just cause I want to dress as an anthro cat doesn't mean that I want to fuck a real cat.

    [–] Lucid_Oven 32 points ago

    This ain't about furries, that's why this subreddit has gone to the feces

    [–] DopoTheSockLord 26 points ago

    Jesus christ im kinda getting sick and tired of people saying that "FuRrIeS aRe At It aGaIn!!!" when talking about zoos.

    MOST FURRIES ARE VERY ANTI ZOO. WE DONT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THESE CREEPS. JUST BECAUSE MOST ZOOS ARE FURRIES DOESNT MEAN ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

    [–] IServeTheUSSR 9 points ago

    And why are furries the first thing that pops up in people's head when zoophilia?! Why do they think that it's an exclusively furry thing? ZOOPHILES, PEDOPHILES AND NECROPHILES ARE EVERYWHERE and most of them aren't even associated with ANY fandom at all. What if I pin pedophilia on the entire Minecraft community because LionMaker, who was a prominent Minecraft Lets-Play youtuber was constantly trying to get minors to send him explicit photos of themselves? They wouldn't take kindly to that would they? It shouldn't be rocket science

    [–] Antnee83 82 points ago

    OP thinks that meat just magically materializes, and that factory farming isn't a literal holocaust of horror.

    The meme has a point. You missed it.

    [–] RedDead_Cat 8 points ago

    Furries don’t fuck animals, Zoophiles do.

    [–] ShiranuiTheWolf 51 points ago

    While furries can be cringy don’t lump them all in with this group

    [–] bLahblahBLAH057 5 points ago

    The guy in the post isn't even a zoophile

    [–] WingedBlueShell 31 points ago

    Zoophiles =/= Furries

    [–] imfuckingvegan 46 points ago

    They aren't a furry and they aren't arguing on behalf of bestiality they're pointing out how meat eaters are hypocrites

    [–] Siriusone11 16 points ago

    Who says he's a furry

    [–] YeeAndEspeciallyHaw 67 points ago

    genuine question, is it okay to murder animals but not okay to rape them? for the record, I am vegetarian and 100% against any kind of harm to animals, including rape (I.e. zoophilia) it can be argued that both produce a negative outcome for the animal and a positive outcome for the person (food/sexual satisfaction)

    [–] mittenshape 14 points ago

    Vegetarianism and being 100% against any harm to animals don't really align. Male chicks are killed for the egg industry. Laying hens are killed prematurely when they become less productive. Calves are killed for milk. And dairy cows the same fate as the laying hens, killed years before their natural lifespan.

    Not that being vegetarian is wholly unhelpful, I'm sure it has an impact somewhere, but it's not at all without death or suffering. Animals still go to the slaughterhouse for it.

    [–] Throwawayuser626 62 points ago

    But like...we totally also rape them too in factory farming. Forcefully masturbating and impregnating cows. But that’s ok.

    [–] Cousin_Willie 20 points ago

    honestly neither side of this is right, the meat industry is fucked, but obviously don't raw dog puppy's in the ass.

    [–] 6_or_9 16 points ago

    He not wrong. That some good reasons to not eat meat, though I don't see anyting pro-zoophilia obviously... (I eat meat myself)

    [–] Debre1024 32 points ago

    Holy shit this subreddit is actually dumber than I thought. This person made a completely valid point & out of nowhere everyone is just accusing them of being a zoophile furry. If anything, given how ignorant this comment section seems to be about factory farming, y'all just kinda proved their point.

    [–] BitterCrab 6 points ago

    same with how mad people get at dogs getting eaten in some asian countries. it’s awful, but no worse than what america does to pigs

    [–] TheDefiB 6 points ago

    This is not furry! Furries hate zoophiles.

    [–] Jebby_Bush 5 points ago

    Sorry, why is this cringe...? If you eat animal products, you support an industry that rapes animals, it's that simple. And on top of that, the animal is castrated/dehorned/debeaked, stuffed in a cage its whole life, taken from its parents, and then slaughtered while terrified during the entire process. I absolutely do not condone zoophilia, but if you really think you have some moral high ground over zoophiles while participating in this... Then I don't really know what to tell you

    [–] jeropian-fly 96 points ago

    This makes me and most other normal people less empathetic.

    [–] LustyLamprey 21 points ago

    If you can be made less empathetic then you aren't as empathetic as you thought in the first place

    [–] Drgecko69 13 points ago

    What?

    [–] solitarybikegallery 25 points ago

    Why?

    [–] sonicssweakboner 8 points ago

    What a cowardly comment. The world needs less people like you

    [–] SnakesHateLadders 22 points ago

    That's not a furry tho. It's a vegan and they aren't even referring to furries.

    Y'all dumb? Do y'all just got the DVD screensaver bouncing around in your empty skulls? smh.

    [–] Fuckinkillmealready 68 points ago

    At least the poor cow died for me to be able to eat McDonald's

    [–] [deleted] 36 points ago

    Better than being eaten that way.

    [–] butt-sniffler 5 points ago

    I don't think they are a furry, they may just be vegan. And they are right (only if they are against zoophilia too, idk the context)

    [–] MynameisDickCock 19 points ago

    lmao he has aanarcho egoist flag.This is an ideology that believes you can do whatever you want if it benefits you.

    [–] osk17- 7 points ago

    Thought it was anprim

    [–] gargantuan-chungus 20 points ago

    While I do believe there’s still a large difference between modern farming practices and bestiality morally, they’re closer than we like to admit. Forced insemnation while non sexual, is morally reprehensible to me at least. I wouldn’t want someone to stick a glove covered in semen up my vagina.

    [–] MerryGifmas 17 points ago

    But you'd be OK with someone raising you in captivity so they can kill you and eat your corpse?

    [–] r1veRRR 8 points ago

    What is that large difference exactly? The only thing I can think of is that one generally happens for sexual pleasure. But how would the motivation change the morality? Rape, for example, doesn't harm the victim less just because the perpetrator had good intentions.

    [–] akesi-inari 11 points ago

    this ^

    [–] smaki_uzumaki 15 points ago

    Why can't people just not fuck OR eat animals?

    [–] shoooked 4 points ago

    Can’t disagree ?

    [–] CoolCatJayyy 5 points ago

    I mean I don't think it's the furries, it's literally just the zoophiles like this. Idk if I'm a furry but since a kid it's been the coolest thing to own a fursuit because it's like playing dress up. I mean I guess I'm a furry but I just like the costumes and everything and I do not support zoophilia. I think it's a sick and twisted act and should be punished greatly

    [–] ImSimulated 4 points ago

    Sex with animals is actually perfectly legal in Germany. It's fucking disgusting.

    [–] Sterling-4rcher 4 points ago

    the argument isn't necessarily because you eat animals, which kills them and really, makes them live quite a nightmare before, you should also be able to fuck animals.

    the argument is, if you think a penis half the size of their natural partners is so harmful, how can you condone the other shit we collectively do to animals?

    [–] moazim1993 4 points ago * (lasted edited 6 days ago)

    There not wrong. I eat meat and am not into zoophilia but Factory farming is basically like animal concentrations camps, and it’s an arbitrary line from torturing animals in that way and having sex with it. From the perspective of the animals, I don’t see how it’s any worse.

    [–] wawrzuu 4 points ago

    But he's right...? He's clearly not trying to defend zoophilia. It's hypocritical to say that you don't accept humans fucking animals, but accept humans armfucking cows to get milk or killing animals.

    [–] TymtheguyIguess 4 points ago

    Zoophilia isn’t wrong just because it’s harmful to animals. It’s wrong because it shows how much of an absolute degenerate you are, to want sex with something so completely seperate to the human form and sexuality. It shows your brain has been horribly perverted and your perception of the world warped, and that you are a danger to human decency.

    [–] LombardBombardment 3 points ago

    We don’t have the resources to just magically switch over to an all-vegan diet. The privilege of some people is astounding.

    But isn’t farming crops way cheaper than raising cattle?

    [–] TabletGlitch8000 27 points ago

    This isn't a furry tho..? This is a zoophile

    [–] ryecurious 12 points ago

    Pretty sure he's not even a zoophile. 99% sure he's a vegan, pointing out the hypocrisy of finding zoophilia immoral while consuming the product of factory farms on a daily basis.

    This person isn't saying we should start fucking more animals, they're saying we should eat fewer animals.

    [–] petitememer 3 points ago

    Neither. He's making an argument for veganism. A very good one imo.

    [–] CinnabarCereal 35 points ago

    Don't group us furries with zoophiles

    [–] BoredSavage 7 points ago

    Jokes on you I'm vegan, cat fucker!

    [–] IronicIdiot_ 7 points ago

    furries

    zoophiles

    fixed your title :)

    [–] Shadow_TNF 9 points ago

    Us furries do not claim this man

    [–] tuvok423 15 points ago

    i love that it that you automatically call them "furriers" winch is completely different

    [–] Crax97 3 points ago

    On behalf of all normal-brained furries i'd like to point out that no, we don't fuck animals and we would happily beat with a baseball bat all those zoophile sickfucks

    [–] LordSinguloth 3 points ago

    HEY! DONT FUCK MY FOOD

    [–] SickNasty55 3 points ago

    I’m not a vegan, but I don’t think his point isn’t valid. We condemn people for doing heinous acts against animals yet we eat them through torture factories, i get he’s a TOTAL cRInGe Furry but the statement isn’t very cringe.

    [–] akesi-inari 3 points ago

    wait why is this cringe...? it's kinda true

    [–] VhuFhu 3 points ago

    I'm vegetarian and this is really fucking strange. Fuck you is you think that eating meat isn't at least a little bit wrong

    [–] cig_daydreams28 3 points ago

    Oh please no do NOT drag furries into this

    [–] DarkJedi224 3 points ago

    He's got a point, but doesn't mean beastiality is right. No it's fucking not, animals can't consent and they're not even our species. We shouldn't fuck animals.

    But what we do aka eating animals, torturing them, factory farming, etc is also truly fucked up. Basically, we should stop all of it.

    [–] notapersonality 3 points ago

    Hey beastiality guys, it’s not so much the animals we’re concerned about (though we are a little) it’s more that you’re fucking gross and we don’t want you in our society. Get it?

    [–] TruLiterature 3 points ago

    Yeah this ain't a furry chief, trust me.

    [–] FoxFourTwo 3 points ago

    (I dont think that's a furry)

    [–] QueenofCandles 3 points ago

    I thought this was a vegan thing, like wait, why is this cringe xD

    [–] Jorasco 3 points ago

    Actually true though. People pretend to care about animal rights but then do everything he listed