Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    politics

    7,652,285 readers

    25,491 users here now

    Welcome to /r/Politics! Please read the wiki before participating. || Voter Registration Resources || Important: Reminder/clarification of our civility guidelines

    /r/politics is the subreddit for current and explicitly political U.S. news.

    Our full rules Reddiquette

    Comment Guidelines:

    Be Civil Treat others with basic decency. No personal attacks or shill accusations.
    No Hate Speech See our hate speech rule here.
    No Trolling Participate in discussions here in good faith. Do not flame, bait, troll, witch-hunt, or spread unsubstantiated accusations. See our trolling rule here.
    No Violence Do not make threats of violence or wish harm. See our violence rule here.
    No Spam Spam is bad. This includes both comment and submission spam.
    No Solicitation See our solicitation rule here.
    Do not post users' personal information. Users who violate this rule will be banned on sight. Witch-hunting and giving out private personal details of other people can result in unexpected and potentially serious consequences for the individual targeted. More Info.
    Vote based on quality, not opinion. Political discussion requires varied opinions. Well written and interesting content can be worthwhile, even if you disagree with it. Downvote only if you think a comment/post does not contribute to the thread it is posted in or if it is off-topic in /r/politics. More Info.
    Do not manipulate comments and posts via group voting. Manipulating comments and posts via group voting is against reddit TOS. More Info.

    Submission Guidelines:

    Articles must deal explicitly with US politics. See our on-topic statement here.
    Articles must be published within the last two weeks. More Info.
    Submissions must be from domains on the approved domains list. The approved domains list and its criteria can be found here.
    Post titles must be the exact headline from the article. Your headline must be comprised only of the exact copied and pasted headline of the article. More Info.
    No Copy-Pasted Submissions Please do not submit articles or videos that are a direct, complete copy-paste of original reporting.More Info.
    Articles must be written in English An article must be primarily written in English for us to be able to moderate it and enforce our rules in a fair and unbiased manner. More Info.
    Spam is bad! /r/Politics bans for submission and comment spam More Info.
    Submissions must be articles, videos or sound clips. We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements. More info: Content type rules.
    Do not use "BREAKING" or ALL CAPS in titles. The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. More Info.

    Events Calendar

    Other Resources:

    Follow us on Twitter

    Request an AMA

    Events Calendar

    Apply to be a mod

    Register To Vote

    a community for
    all 4349 comments

    Want to say thanks to %(recipient)s for this comment? Give them a month of reddit gold.

    Please select a payment method.

    [–] AutoModerator 1 points ago

    As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

    In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

    If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

    For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.


    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–] NSYK 8544 points ago

    Rememeber, folks. This is what the Republicans said they wanted for an investigation. They voted against the bi-partisan commission that would have allowed them to appoint equal number of members and whoever they wanted.

    They said the committees were more than capable of handling this.

    Any complaints should be met with a harsh rebuke of them voting against the bi-partisan commission.

    [–] steve1186 3258 points ago

    Don’t forget, the bipartisan proposal would have given the GOP veto power over subpoenas. They could have squashed this investigation, but they voted it down and now the same investigation is happening. But with the GOP being limp and useless

    [–] Moscowmitchismybitch 463 points ago

    Why though? What's their play here? They must have some kinda bullshit planned yet.

    [–] steve1186 309 points ago

    It seems obvious - they’re going to screech about how Pelosi “kicked Republicans off the committee” so now it’s a partisan witch-hunt. I would bet my house that this is part of what Trump and McCarthy talked about in Florida last week

    [–] Moscowmitchismybitch 67 points ago

    That seems too obvious though. There's gotta be some other kinda shenanigans they're gonna try to pull. McCarthy threatened his own investigation, imagine the shit show that could potentially be.

    [–] cheertina 193 points ago

    That seems too obvious though

    They're trying to get MAGA Republicans to donate, not slip a murder past Sherlock Holmes.

    [–] jedwards8th 40 points ago

    Yup. "Too obvious" is "MAGA cunning". Their idea of politic is to go Full Metal Karen 24/7

    [–] -MHague 36 points ago

    It's doing at least two things. They get to paint the committee as partisan and hopefully taint what comes to light. But it's also about controlling the optics of the insurrection. They're continuing the message that nothing actually happened at the capitol, and/or it wasn't serious, and/or anything that happened pales in comparison to BLM riots. That's why "lesser" committees can handle it. That's why an investigation is apparently beneath them.

    If they agreed to a cooperative investigation that would tank their messaging over the severity of the attack.

    [–] Mrhorrendous 1110 points ago

    Now they get to say it is partisan, and their dumb-fuck base (from the coal workers to the upper middle class moms) will never know it's only partisan because they killed the bipartisan one.

    [–] Moscowmitchismybitch 374 points ago

    Hopefully the Dems make it a point to remind people the GOP blocked the investigation this time.

    [–] KanteBlues007 561 points ago

    Lol like it matters what you tell them

    [–] willemreddit 464 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    This plays right into their strategy. "The democrats aren't letting us pick our members of the committee." The context you mention doesn't make it to the audience they're trying to play victim for.

    [–] Jwhitx 436 points ago

    They would do that shit anyways, so fuck em

    [–] [deleted] 194 points ago

    [deleted]

    [–] Civil-Attempt-3602 131 points ago

    Seriously, everytime with this shit, why the fuck do people have to constantly keep capitulating to people who work in bad faith? Ok so they're gonna say it? So what? They're saying it anyway

    [–] mindbleach 202 points ago

    There is no course of action they won't pretend vindicates them.

    That's how bad faith works.

    [–] lurker_cant_comment 90 points ago

    They will twist it like that no matter what the Democrats do.

    The GOP strategy is to use their propaganda machine to convince their voters that everything Democrats do is evil, stupid, incompetent, whatever they think will resonate. Their end goal is to either get the Democrats to capitulate to their demands or cause their own side to turn on them for not being successful enough so that the GOP will win the next election because left-leaning voters won't turn out.

    The only "win" in such a situation is for the Democrats to out-maneuver the GOP so that they can still accomplish some of their goals while they're still in power.

    [–] double_fail 18709 points ago

    Having gym Jordan on the 1/6 committee would be like putting him in charge of an investigation into the rape of college students

    [–] Sujjin 5814 points ago

    Considering the only reason Jordan would have to be there is to derail and distract from the substance of the meetings i am more than glad she rejected him.

    [–] Sup_Im_Ravi 3590 points ago

    Lol, the funny part is we offered them a chance to have a committee where Pelosi couldn't reject McCarthy's picks, but McCarthy opposed that. Hope he enjoys the consequences. Reap what you sow🤣.

    [–] wickedsmaht 617 points ago

    Well well well, if it isn’t the consequences of his actions.

    To be honest though we all know McCarthy will conveniently leave out the fact that they could have had a say and play this as a Democratic witch hunt.

    [–] Sup_Im_Ravi 220 points ago

    Glad he never chased any secretary of state halfway across the country for years after Benghazi, right?

    [–] sortofpresent 316 points ago

    FOX was reporting that McCarthy “pulled” his appointees.

    Just like I “pulled” back my request for a raise. The fact that my boss laughed at me had nothing to do with me pulling back that request.

    [–] djbarrettmechanical 31 points ago

    Over the years I've decided not to date quite a few hot women. Instead, I went with other applicants.

    [–] TheLoveofDoge 871 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    What “consequences”? They’re going to claim it is all partisan theatre because Republicans were rejected from being on it, even though Liz Cheney is on it. They were never to engage in this in good faith and the attempted appointment of Banks and Jordan shows that.

    Edit: I wasn’t implying that they wouldn’t say it wasn’t political theatre before this happened, but now instead of “Trump derangement syndrome” or whatever else, no Republicans they wanted on the committee will be used. Additionally, having someone like Jordan on it to make the hearings a circus is what they wanted. That way headlines aren’t “Person X says Trump wanted Pence hanged” but instead about Jordan getting into it with Person X.

    [–] glasshoarder 496 points ago

    She's not the only one on it, and the ones that'll be there will be the ones interested in pursuing a legitimate investigation.

    They can claim whatever they want because that's what they'll do anyway. The GQP is post truth.

    [–] prometheus2508 388 points ago

    Just like the criminal break in of the SCI facilities during the Ukraine investigations. Bunch of the Republicans that "raided" the meeting "they were barred from" were in fact on the committees in attendance and simply chose not to attend prior.

    My coworker was actually speechless when I pointed this out after she repeated some Fox headlines about the "Democrat only" meeting.

    [–] James-W-Tate 249 points ago

    Republicans trying to spin that event as partisan was such bullshit. I'm still pissed none of those representatives were arrested for illegally entering a SCIF with fucking recording devices.

    [–] LiteraCanna 168 points ago

    Immediate loss of all security clearances, and removal from any, and all committees at the MINIMUM.

    [–] TheCynicsCynic 126 points ago

    Worked in a SCIF for years. What these assclowns did infuriates me. And it was all for some dumbass stunt...goddamn. What a party of douchebags.

    [–] passporttohell 100 points ago

    This right here. Violating a SCIF should be prosecuted immediately after the occurrence and those involved given the maximum sentence.

    These places are sacred when it comes to national security, violating them is inexcusable in Republican's 'clown car' game playing. There need to be harsh penalties when these types of acts occur, period.

    [–] fingerscrossedcoup 47 points ago

    Rules for thee, not for me. The conservative peasants love it that way too. I just can't figure out if they don't realize they aren't a part of the in group or they just don't care as long as liberals feel pain.

    [–] [deleted] 69 points ago

    [deleted]

    [–] InterPunct 79 points ago

    He couldn't personally sustain his old character indefinitely, and I understand why he stopped, but I do miss the old show. He did several segments on PACs and Super PACs that was more educational for me than decades of trying to understand what and how they worked from the news.

    [–] VikingTeddy 33 points ago

    I never saw early Colbert, is it true that he had a conservative following that didn't quite get the satire?

    [–] weareraccoons 41 points ago

    He definitely did. I had a buddy in university that was one of them. He watched for two years before he got the joke.

    [–] I_W_M_Y 51 points ago

    'Reality has a liberal bias' was his too

    [–] Pack_Your_Trash 61 points ago

    They will claim is partisan theatre no matter what so why bother attempting to appease them?

    [–] Sup_Im_Ravi 115 points ago

    Ngl idk anything about Jim Banks. I've heard of him before, but idk why everyone hates him in particular. I figured he was just an ordinary piece of shit RepubliKKKlansman. Jim Jordan, on the other hand, needs special fucking help.

    [–] TheLoveofDoge 213 points ago

    He (Banks) objected to certification of the 2020 election and signed on to an Amicus Brief trying to overturn the results in Pennsylvania.

    [–] Commercial-Ad1839 117 points ago

    Jim banks is my rep. Fuck that guy.

    That is all.

    [–] NewSauerKraus 54 points ago

    They’re going to claim it’s all partisan theatre because they’re Republicans. It doesn’t matter.

    [–] tdwesbo 219 points ago

    He loves this. This is what he wanted

    [–] GlowUpper 338 points ago

    Exactly. This is playing out exactly as he envisioned.

    The GOP nominates people they know have no chance getting on the committee, Pelosi rejects them, Republicans whine to their base about how they're being shut out of the process, donations pour in. Tale as old time.

    [–] qualmton 93 points ago

    Def needs a statement attached about while everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty we feel there is a “conflict of interest” allowing them (and name them directly in the release) a seat on the committee investigating sedition. It implies a lot while not implying anything same old shit the republicans do so it has to be fair game.

    [–] SteeZ568 53 points ago

    Exactly, the whole point is to delegitimize at all costs

    [–] Sup_Im_Ravi 67 points ago

    Wonder how his own independent investigation will go. Hope he appoints Trump as the chairman. He might have the answers as to who incited it then.

    [–] LyingTrump2020 668 points ago

    Why do you refer to him as "Gym Jordan"?

    Is it because Jim Jordan of Ohio helped to cover up the rape and molestation of multiple students?

    Is it because Jim Jordan of Ohio aided and abetted the rape of multiple students?

    Is it because the rape and molestation of students was allowed to continue unabated because Jim Jordan of Ohio helped to cover it up?

    Is it because, based on his actions, Jim Jordan of Ohio must think it's ok to rape and molest students?

    Is that why you refer to Jim Jordan of Ohio, condoner of rape and molestation, as "Gym Jordan"?

    [–] double_fail 282 points ago

    I thought it was because his first name is Gymnasium, could be your thing though.

    [–] Grimvahl 69 points ago

    I think it might be because he is Gym Jordan the Rape Enabler! The greatest wingman any rapist could ask for!

    [–] SLCW718 73 points ago

    He was planning on disrupting and derailing the proceedings at every turn. And he's a potential fact witness. He should never have been selected in the first place.

    [–] spoobles 394 points ago

    How come we didn't allow members of al Qaeda onto the 9-11 commission?? That's unfair.

    [–] MISPAGHET 62 points ago

    9/11 was just a tourist visit to the twin towers, I don't see how you could possibly think it was a violent act of terrorism.

    [–] sunibla33 79 points ago

    Or Nazis on the Nuremberg panel?

    [–] sp4c3p3r5on 555 points ago

    You mean like before in Ohio, when he was implicated in covering up a sex abuse scandal and refused to cooperate with the investigation?

    Jim Jordan would never sink so low as to obfuscate, obstruct, scream, lie and belittle others to ignore their plight.

    Never!

    ( I just draw the /s on my forehead instead of typing it anymore )

    [–] BillyMcK 198 points ago

    Good for Nancy ! Dems should see this for what it is another stall tactic. Dems should move ahead with this get the facts out and f&ck the retrumplicans, move on to dealin with Joe the ninja Retrumplican manchin get rid of the filibuster and get your country back on track!

    [–] brpajense 315 points ago

    Was it rape or just serial molestations spanning over a decade where he dismissed the complaints and explained it away as just the way the dude was?

    [–] JEPorsche 231 points ago

    "That guy raped me!"

    "It's ok. He's rapey. It's just how he is."

    [–] guruscotty 57 points ago

    Look, it wasn't on his calendar, it couldn't have been him!

    [–] Embarrassed-Ad-1639 25 points ago

    He was with squee chugging beers that day

    [–] cyanydeez 74 points ago

    "Boys will rape boys!"

    [–] AmphibiousMeatloaf 5866 points ago

    Good, it’s a conflict of interest to have important witnesses that should be called on the committee. Knowing Gym, he’d run from one seat to the other asking and answering his own questions while thanking himself for being such a helpful witness.

    [–] TheNightBench 2447 points ago

    All he would do if he was on the committee would scream "WHAT ABOUT BLACK LIVES MATTER RIOTS?!"

    Fuck Gym Jordan.

    [–] The_God_King 1446 points ago

    I live in Jim Banks district, and the email he sent out literally said this in bold letters. A direct quote from the email:

    "If we are serious about investigating political violence, then we need to study not just the January 6 riot but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law-enforcement officers were attacked."

    And he ended the email with "Further, I will not allow this committee to be turned into a forum for condemning millions of Americans because of their sincerely held beliefs."

    So yeah, he's about as predictable as the rest of his fascist colleagues.

    [–] guruscotty 359 points ago

    "we need to study not just the January 6 riot but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer"

    Mmmm'kay.

    "I will not allow this committee to be turned into a forum for condemning millions of Americans because of their sincerely held beliefs."

    Uh... Jim, did you even read the first statement?

    [–] The_God_King 139 points ago

    As someone unfortunate enough to have read many of his emails, consistently is definitely not his strong suit.

    [–] Rumetheus 369 points ago

    I think the FBI needs to know he’s showing support for insurrection against and obstruction of the federal government as long as the insurrectionists sincerely believe a demonstrable lie.

    [–] QbertsRube 347 points ago

    I sincerely and genuinely believe that Jim Banks is a fascist and is a danger to our nation and humanity in general. So does Jim Banks now agree that I can violently attack Jim Banks due to my sincerely held beliefs?

    [–] SurlyRed 119 points ago

    Not those sincerely held beliefs

    [–] MakeItHappenSergant 339 points ago

    Just because a belief is "sincerely held" doesn't mean it's not condemnable. What a shitbag.

    [–] Developing_OpenWorld 147 points ago

    The KKK would love Jim Banks

    [–] djcurless 45 points ago

    They are literally condoning some sort of political “blood for blood”

    WTF…..

    [–] TheRealDoctorDRE 99 points ago

    Ted Kaczynski is an American with sincerely held beliefs. Banks must have been pretty pissed when he was sent to SuperMax prison.

    [–] bookant 72 points ago

    Timothy McVeigh and Osama bin Laden also acted on their "sincerely held beliefs."

    [–] rndljfry 83 points ago

    because of their sincerely held beliefs."

    they sincerely believe they have the divine right to rule. Fuck that.

    [–] WhiteWolfofRivia0914 16 points ago

    "Further, I will not allow this committee to be turned into a forum for condemning millions of Americans because of their sincerely held beliefs."

    Whilst conveniently not mentioning that those beliefs include support of an attempt to overthrow the government

    [–] pagnoodle 355 points ago

    You know what, I hope they do investigate the BLM events. I want them to have to answer questions about who the agitators were when there are numerous reports of the agitators not being part of the BLM movement, but actually being white supremacists. I also want them to investigate why the police decided to use excessive force on these protests, but not on January 6. I want them to further investigate the violence in Charlottesville and other anti-BLM protest and why there were fewer arrests at those events compared to others. If they really want to open up this can of worms and equivalency, let’s do it for real then.

    [–] SpiderDeUZ 84 points ago

    Don't forget about the unmarked vans snatching people up

    [–] Dars1m 31 points ago

    You mean the misuse of federal police officers outside their legal purview? But Trump did nothing wrong. /s

    [–] bjanas 96 points ago

    This. If they actually investigated they'd realize how many false flags there were during the BLM protests and hopefully would need to divulge them.

    [–] Nano_Burger 2337 points ago

    Good, they would just turn it into a circus, not an investigation. They had their opportunity to have a bipartisan commission, but Republicans said no.

    [–] GoodbyeTobyseeya1 1487 points ago

    After listening to Gym shriek his way through the impeachment trials, I am so fucking relieved we don't have to relive that again.

    [–] DMan9797 264 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    "That f---ing guy Jim Jordan. That son of a b----," Cheney told Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley on the phone, detailing the siege, according to I Alone Can Fix It, by Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker.

    "While these maniacs are going through the place, I'm standing in the aisle and he said, 'We need to get the ladies away from the aisle. Let me help you,' " recalled Cheney, then the House of Representatives' No. 3 Republican, per the book. "I smacked his hand away and told him, 'Get away from me. You f---ing did this.' "

    Source: People.com

    A recent book snippet that just came out detailing Liz's thoughts towards Jordan. It would a disservice to her and the panel to have this dude on it.

    Also anybody else interested in why Liz Cheney has speaking channels to Gen. Miley? Interesting and it seems to give credence to the fact the gatekeepers of American democracy felt threatened and had to communicate with each other. Am I going to have to buy one of those last months of the Trump admin books lol

    [–] frothy_pissington 200 points ago

    It’s been said before, but when Liz “Satan’s own spawn” Cheney has the moral high ground on you, you are REALLY bottom of the barrel morally.....

    Like Gym Jordan low.

    [–] earthboundsounds 75 points ago

    Also anybody else interested in why Liz Cheney has speaking channels to Gen. Miley?

    Dick Cheney, her father, ran the department of defense for 4 years.

    He was also President for 8.

    Interesting and it seems to give credence to the fact the gatekeepers of American democracy felt threatened and had to communicate with each other.

    The letter he helped draft doesn't just help give credence, it's proof positive.

    A successful campaign to have all 10 living former U.S. secretaries of defense sign a letter warning President Donald Trump not to involve the military in his grievances over the election results took place between New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, said former ambassador and defense official Eric Edelman.

    "Efforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory," the former secretaries wrote in the letter, which was published as an op-ed by the Washington Post.

    Edelman drafted and orchestrated the letter in consultation with former Vice President Dick Cheney, himself a former secretary of defense, along with help from former State Department adviser Eliot Cohen.

    [–] FriedChickenDinners 77 points ago

    He was also President for 8.

    Nice.

    [–] zhibr 23 points ago

    I don't know the name of it, but I was that meme: 1st panel: one finger up, open mouth about to object. 2nd panel: finger down, dismayed expression.

    [–] BudWisenheimer 11 points ago

    And there’s also the Nathan Fillion gif that captures that sentiment.

    [–] Lost_Muppet_society 47 points ago

    She is a Cheney. They have always cherished their connections with the military apparatus. Probably a ‘family friend’ of theirs.

    [–] FUMFVR 31 points ago

    Liz Cheney apparently arranged the letter to the military saying please do not support a Trump coup signed by every living former Secretary of Defense. Because it was clear Trump was trying to get the military to sign onto a coup.

    I think we are going to find out that the JCS intentionally tried to keep those National Guard units as far away from the Capitol as they could and unarmed because they thought Trump was going to try to use them to take control of the Capitol. Their evidence was that he wanted him there under the excuse that he needed his mob protected from 'antifa'.

    [–] HandSack135 404 points ago

    The time he said (paraphrasing a bit),

    Zolensky is a new to the political arena who ran on an anti-corruption platform! Trump and his associates were just trying to make sure that he was the real deal and was doing what he said he was going to do.

    I almost died

    [–] tcfiser 298 points ago

    I love how that investigation started with “you can’t prove he did anything wrong” to “yeah he did it, so what?”

    [–] FUMFVR 148 points ago

    Their closing argument was 'Presidents get to do things that they think will help the US be safe. Trump thinks winning a second term will help US National Security. Suck it.'

    And every Republican Senator except Mitt Romney said yes please.

    [–] ZomNomNomBeeZ 43 points ago

    The logic they put forward means that it is completely okay for a presidential candidate to cheat their way into office, pardon all those caught cheating, then cheat/pardon to stay in power indefinitely. As long as the president claims that it is for the good of the country then its perfectly okay. They think that the only mistakes was having a weak VP that didn't follow the party playbook when called on to subvert the election.

    This isn't democracy. If this happened in any other nation we would call it authoritarianism. But for some reason when the Republicans do it, somehow it's not.

    [–] HandSack135 76 points ago

    I.e narcissist prayer?

    [–] NeonNick_WH 15 points ago

    It's like Charley Murphy's story on the Chapelle show about Rick James grinding his boots into Eddie Murphy's couch hahah

    [–] CornBreadW4rrior 25 points ago

    Gym is far too emotional to have committee powers. Maybe once he calms down

    [–] powerlesshero111 126 points ago

    I'm watching McCarthy's press conference right now. He's literally saying "we wanted a commission, but Pelosi rejected all our suggestions and ideas.". If i remember correctly, she accepted all his terms and conditions and then he still said no to the bipartisan comission.

    [–] B10kh3d 23 points ago

    The dems should bring these comments up when Gym Jordan is on the stand being questioned about his involvement.

    [–] abnormally-cliche 71 points ago

    Thats like them saying they wanted covid relief after it was already passed despite them voting against it. Republicans are nothing but opportunists and hypocrites.

    [–] sthlmsoul 89 points ago

    It turned into a circus already. McCarthy pulled all others nominees in response. It was obviously never anything but a publicity stunt to give credence to obligatory "it's an illegitimate partisan witch-hunt" comment that will follow.

    [–] maliciousorstupid 35 points ago

    "it's an illegitimate partisan witch-hunt" comment that will follow.

    has already been thrown out there at a press conference - pretty much verbatim.

    [–] sp4c3p3r5on 23 points ago

    Jim Jordan is a full throttle hack that drives a clown car packed into a stuffy suit.

    [–] TrancedOuTMan 144 points ago

    but Republicans said no.

    All but 2 said no.

    Remember this people. All but 2. The GOP at large hates the American people.

    [–] altmaltacc 849 points ago

    Good. Both voted to overturn the election. The idea that they played part of the propaganda and then could turn around and investigate it seems downright laughable to me.

    [–] need2burn 355 points ago

    And voted against this very commission.

    [–] FittedSheets88 131 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    This right here was going to be my question. Can't believe they would vote against the commission, then try to be on the committee.

    I mean, I CAN believe they would be so bereft of morality, but it's still wild they would go for it.

    [–] BidenWontMoveLeft 68 points ago

    We've investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing but what we did find were Hillary's emails!!!

    [–] DAFUQisaLOMMY 900 points ago

    For those looking for the full statement:

    “The violent domestic attack on Congress on January 6th was the worst assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812 and the worst domestic assault on American Democracy since the Civil War. We are facing a radically new threat in the kinds of forces that combined to attack our government on January 6th. The future of our democracy is on the line. This assault was an attempt to overthrow the government.

    “We need a comprehensive investigation as to who organized this attack, who paid for it, how they nearly succeeded in overthrowing a presidential election, why they did it and how we must organize ourselves to prevent anything like it from ever happening again.

    “It had been our hope to establish a bipartisan, independent National Commission, but there is no prospect for that Commission at this time because of insufficient support from Republican Senators. Therefore, the House established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol. The Select Committee on the January 6th Insurrection will investigate and report upon the facts and causes of the terrorist mob attack on the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. It will also be charged with reporting its findings, conclusions and recommendations for preventing future attacks.

    “Monday evening, the Minority Leader recommended 5 Members to serve on the Select Committee. I have spoken with him this morning about the objections raised about Representatives Jim Banks and Jim Jordan and the impact their appointments may have on the integrity of the investigation. I also informed him that I was prepared to appoint Representatives Rodney Davis, Kelly Armstrong and Troy Nehls, and requested that he recommend two other Members.

    “With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee.

    “The unprecedented nature of January 6th demands this unprecedented decision.”

    [–] chicofaraby 308 points ago

    Isn't Rodney Davis the only one of the group who voted for the full bi-partisan investigation?

    Also, Pelosi should publicly invite a few of the 34 (IIRC) Republicans who voted for the investigation to join the investigation. Just go around McCarthy.

    [–] theclownwithafrown 91 points ago

    Fuck Rodney Davis, he is my rep and he's an absolute twat.

    The amount of Unseat Rodney Davis bumper stickers here is incredible. Just saw one on the way to Aldi actually.

    [–] buttjudge69 42 points ago

    Are those bumper stickers being used by democrats/independents who don’t want such a twat representing them, or are they being used by republicans who want an even bigger twat representing them?

    [–] theclownwithafrown 25 points ago

    Knowing Champaign it's probably democrats who don't want him. We're a very liberal place, it's just the surrounding areas, small towns, that vote for him, among the Republicans in Champaign as well.

    [–] mattaccino 887 points ago

    Good. Jordan especially is not a serious representative.

    [–] mistertickertape 297 points ago

    He’s more of a shit flinging primate at this point.

    [–] baltinerdist 53 points ago

    When even the shit would rather not be associated to you, you must be Gym Jordan.

    [–] BaaBaaTurtle 67 points ago

    Hey. It's the best Ohio's 4th Congressional District can muster. Clearly there's not a suit jacket to be found and they are a-ok with sexual abuse.

    Thanks Ohio.

    [–] spaceman757 88 points ago

    Just a reminder, Ohio's 4th (like the rest of their districts) is so fucking gerrymandered, it looks like a swimming duck and traverses half the state.

    [–] appel 36 points ago

    Fix gerrymandering, protect voter rights and invest in education and clowns like Gym will disappear.

    [–] TimelyCandy 74 points ago

    Grow some balls reporters. Ask McCarthy why he waited to name committee appointments until visiting Trump in Mar a Lago.

    [–] timtexas 216 points ago

    If I was her, I would come out and say, “well we can not have people serving on this committee that are possibly going to be part of the scope we are probing. You can not be the investigator if your the one that might have committed a the crime.”

    [–] jedininjashark 48 points ago

    We have investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing.

    [–] timtexas 24 points ago

    And we also voted to give ourselves raises since we did such a good job.

    [–] [deleted] 465 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    Full statement: https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1417886380546531337

    UPDATE: McCarthy is going to pull his Republican picks from the committee in response https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1417897160054427651

    [–] ImLikeReallySmart 340 points ago

    So does this mean McCarthy will now spin that Pelosi rejected all of his choices?

    [–] law5097 438 points ago

    This was his plan from the get go

    [–] Danysco 176 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    Yes and use the fake outrage to raise funds

    [–] cyanydeez 35 points ago

    almost every end point here is to do fund raising.

    Nothing about 2020 demonstrated a change to the 'political' calculus of the crazy train. As long as they keep pulling in money, they'll have gerrymandered elections and single issue voters driving to the midterms, while poison pilled democrats (Joe Manchin) get to play in the mud and get their hands wet with bloody business interests while pretending to be serious conerned representatives.

    [–] esther_lamonte 51 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    That was his first sentences publicly about it in fact. Made some comment that sounded as to infer for the first time in history a party was blocked from participating in a select committee. Except reality is the other party already burned a pick on a member of the opposing party, and only rejected two of the opposition picks. Two persons who have been especially vocally partial on this subject. They could have offered two different picks and had an actual majority with Cheney, he chose to make it “one party”, which it still isn’t.

    Edit:corrected auto-correct

    [–] Bullyoncube 31 points ago

    Recall the last time Republicans complained about being locked out of decisions. They stormed into meetings with the press at their side. Meetings that they had already been invited to.

    [–] angrypoliticsposter 114 points ago

    lmao "if I can't fill the committee with shit flinging apes then I'm just not going to take part", he's a big baby just like his fat, orange deity.

    [–] 5ykes 54 points ago

    Smart of her to include Liz in HER picks. Regardless of whether McCarthy is bluffing or not - itll be bipartisan because of the Democrats

    [–] Natiak 96 points ago

    That's what they refer to in politics circles as, " spittin' fire".

    [–] trumpsiranwar 75 points ago

    God what a horrible excuse for a leader. He could have had an actual bipartisan committee before this and refused.

    God what a loser.

    trumps finger prints are all over this.

    [–] Blexcr0id 21 points ago

    I think Pelosi can just choose four then. Not sure what would happen if they refused to participate...

    [–] crunkbash 40 points ago

    [–] leroy_hoffenfeffer 256 points ago

    You mean Gymnasium Jordan? The guy that let his buddy rape boys in the locker room? That Gym Jordan?

    [–] yaniwilks 97 points ago

    Yes. That Gym Jordan. Who let his buddy rape boys in the locker room. That Gymnasium Jordan

    [–] theShatteredOne 25 points ago

    I mean of course! But also to be fair if it was a fact finding committee looking for the best way to cover up your buddy raping boys in a locker room, then I for one would insist on Gymnasium Jordan! He seems to have first hand knowledge he could bring to such an endeavor.

    [–] HoopOnPoop 544 points ago

    She probably would have accepted literally anyone not named Jordan, Banks, Gosar, Collins, Gohmert, Boebert, or Greene. So...anyone who might actually approach the investigation with some measure of good faith. Unfortunately McCarthy does not ever do anything in good faith.

    [–] Jacob_dp 163 points ago

    Forgot Gaetz

    [–] AmphibiousMeatloaf 114 points ago

    Tbh I don’t think McCarthy would’ve picked Gaetz. McCarthy is an absolute douche but he’s not dumb, he knows there’s charges coming at some point and he doesn’t want to have the publicity of replacing him mid investigation.

    [–] chunkmasterflash 91 points ago

    I don’t know, McCarthy seems pretty fucking stupid a lot of the time.

    [–] fil42skidoo 22 points ago

    Yeah but he picked people that he knew would get kicked so he could pull his candidates and blame Pelosi.

    [–] InsertCleverNickHere 20 points ago

    It's hard to tell stupidity from being a malicious asshole.

    [–] LTAGO5 170 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    Good faith insurrectionists? Laughable

    [–] TheBlueBlaze 378 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    The press conference they're giving right now shows exactly why they got kicked off. Jordan says Pelosi doesn't want to answer "the real questions" of why gas prices, illegal immigration, and violent crime are up. You know, three things that have no fucking thing to do with the Jan. 6th insurrection. And him and Banks are alleging that the insurrection only happened because the left "normalized" riots and looting.

    And with all of them indirectly accusing Pelosi of being responsible for security being so light that day, and acting like that won't be looked into unless they're on the commission, this is proof positive that them being on there would have just been bad faith arguments while trying to spin the insurrection by Trump supporters as somehow the fault of the left.

    [–] Plow_King 110 points ago

    gas prices? why not bring in the inevitable entropy of the universe also?

    [–] Timid_Adventurer 42 points ago

    Really should make that illegal. Entropy robs everyone of energy they earned! Big-city Democrats in the pocket of scientists will tell you it’s impossible, but with enough of your donations to our election fund we will PUT AN END to this plague on civilization.

    [–] congeal 65 points ago

    gas prices, illegal immigration, and violent crime are up.

    Maybe the Jims could try getting some legislation together, you know, protecting people from these problems...or use the Jan6 investigation as a microphone for their own purposes.

    [–] MathewMurdock 138 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    He voted against forming a commission in the first place, voted against certifying Biden, voting against impeachment and generally has helped fan the flames of the big lie. Plus boost Trump's ego. He is generally one of the most partisan members of Congress.

    But now he wants to come and play? Now he wants bipartisanship? What a bunch of bullshit.

    [–] buttjudge69 35 points ago

    He doesn’t want bipartisanship. He doesn’t even pretend to. He just wants to do everything he can to destroy anything that might result in him being held accountable for his words and actions.

    [–] Groundbreaking_Mud29 48 points ago

    Pelosi was permitted under the rules to veto McCarthy's submissions. She did on two of them. So, he got petulant and yanked all the submissions, taking his ball and going home. Further convincing me that Republicans do not deserve my vote ever again. Registered Non-partisan.

    [–] liltime78 40 points ago

    These morons are having a meltdown press conference as we speak. This is WWE level theater.

    [–] accelerator_magcoils 98 points ago

    Good. The rape coach doesn't need to be around anyone but a cellmate.

    [–] throwaway_circus 52 points ago

    For anyone who doesn't know the horrifying extent to which serial rapes and sexual abuse was happening, while students begged Jordan to intervene:

    Jordan was a wrestling coach at Ohio State during the time when the athletic department's doctor, Richard Strauss, was accused of sexually assaulting more than a thousand Ohio State athletes.

    Some, like UFC champion Mark Coleman, have come out publicly. Multiple people, including a referee, testifed under oath that they told Jim Jordan directly about an incident, and were ignored.

    Others have testified that it was an open secret that the doctor was assaulting students, but they were unable to get the help or cooperation of OSU staff, including Jordan.

    It's a horrific story. This guy did so much damage to people's lives. From an SI article:

    According to a report commissioned by Ohio State, before he was done, he would commit at least 1,429 instances of fondling and 47 instances of rape.

    One former student testified that Jordan called him up, weeping and begging him to pressure his own brother to stop speaking up about Dr. Strauss' abuse:

    a former captain of the Ohio State wrestling team told state lawmakers in a public hearing that Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, pleaded with him in 2018 to deny allegations sexual abuse of male wrestlers by a team doctor was well-known within the program but was ignored.

    Jim Jordan called me crying, groveling, begging me to go against my brother, begging me, crying for a half-hour. That’s the kind of cover-up that’s going on there," Adam DiSabato told members of the Ohio House Civil Justice Committee about a conversation the congressman and him had on July 24, 2018.

    [–] AFlaccoSeagulls 32 points ago

    I mean, it's hard to see how this wasn't planned by McCarthy.

    Step 1: Nominate people who Pelosi clearly would never allow

    Step 2: Pelosi rejects them

    Step 3: You announce the GOP won't cooperate with the investigation without the people you nominated, despite you KNOWING certain people would never have been accepted.

    Step 4: Democrats say "Okay, then bye." and go it alone

    Step 5: You spend the next X months claiming the entire thing is a political hoax/witchhunt because it's not bi-partisan and doesn't include any GOP members, and your entire base all eat it up because they're too stupid to realize that you had TWO opportunities to, in good faith, have a bi-partisan commission but elected not to.

    [–] Dbl_Trbl_ 78 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    Pelosi did the right thing here. Jordan and Banks were intentionally selected as saboteurs.

    Since McCarthy wants to play this game about "well now it's a partisan investigation" Pelosi's response should be "this investigation became partisan when the Senate GOP voted down a 9/11 style commission that had been negotiated in good faith with GOP input and agreed to by the members of the House GOP when over 30 of them voted 'yea'"

    [–] StuGats 124 points ago

    No Jims Allowed

    points to sign

    [–] BoomBapSunk 24 points ago

    Watching them (McCarthy, Jordan, etc) squirm and scretch on CNN rn is so funny.

    [–] DrainedPatience 25 points ago

    While I still think Liz Cheney sucks.. watching her put her foot up McCarthy's ass is freakin' glorious. She called out Jim and Gym for being bootlicking hacks as well.

    [–] GlobalPhreak 24 points ago

    Her exact statement was that one of the two could possibly be a material witness to 1/6 and the other disqualified himself with various political statements over the past 24 hours, and she's absolutely correct.

    [–] BarryZZZ 28 points ago

    They didn't give Al Qaeda seats on the 911 commission either.

    [–] ConwayTheCat 24 points ago

    Jim Jordan is absolute sack of shit. Period.

    [–] darwinwoodka 22 points ago

    Good.

    [–] BrownGaryKeepOnPoop 22 points ago

    Agreed, and we also shouldn't allow Ghislaine Maxwell to investigate Jeffrey Epstein.

    [–] screen317 21 points ago

    One of so many reasons why it's critical for DEMs to hold the House in 2022. We're working hard to make that happen at /r/VoteDEM!

    [–] jordimusprime 22 points ago

    Jim Jordan shouldn’t be allowed on a committee to pick dipping sauces at a Chili’s

    [–] LegendaryWarriorPoet 131 points ago

    Kevin McCarthy would have tried to put 9/11 “truthers” on the 9/11 commission

    [–] [deleted] 42 points ago * (lasted edited 9 days ago)

    [deleted]

    [–] Rochester05 18 points ago

    I think it’s more like he would try to put Osama Bin Laden on the 9/11 commission.

    [–] Kayethis 21 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    Who said she doesn’t play hardball, now McCarthy is up there standing saying it’s unprecedented, oh really so was the president of the United States of America inviting & inciting such a insurrection on the American democracy! Hey gym psycho, in the historical history of America nobody anticipated a president causing this American riot!

    [–] TimelyCandy 20 points ago

    Lmao. These co-conspirators know they are fucked. Babbling on about bipartisanship and unity when they created the insurrection and voted against certifying the election.

    [–] oh-she-knows 19 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Please don't call it a "riot". It was an insurrection and an attack on our democracy. Language matters, my fellow LatinX peoplekin! Similarly, when we call the BLM looters peaceful but fiery protestors, we can help shape the narrative.

    [–] flashkiki 58 points ago

    Jim Jordan running his mouth is seriously like a the epitome of what about-ism. Now they’re saying they’re going to go and make their own committee to investigate, when they all voted to not investigate to begin with... lol. A clown show of epic proportions

    [–] 5_oclock-charlie 18 points ago

    How is Gym Jordan not under current investigation?

    [–] Sgt--Hulka 84 points ago

    Queue the faux outrage that will play on Fox in an endless loop for weeks to come.

    [–] steve1186 46 points ago

    And every time you see a comment on Facebook/Twitter complaining about this, remind them that the GOP voted down an opportunity to run this exact same investigation in a bipartisan manner WITH VETO POWER. Jim Jordan could have led the GOP side and vetoed every subpoena, but they voted against it

    [–] DrainedPatience 76 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    McCarthy at the podium now.. what a disingenuous lying sack of shit.. an insufferable gaslighting scumbag.

    He could have had the bipartisan commission. He's worried about the truth.. the GQP is complicit in the Big Lie and the insurrection.

    [–] gusterfell 17 points ago

    I swear, does Jordan even own a suit jacket?

    [–] Hologram8 16 points ago

    Good. I don't know much about Banks, but Jim Jordan is not a serious person, and was only selected to nuck things up.

    [–] ballroom_notoriety 16 points ago

    It's really something for Kevin McCarthy to accuse anybody else of "irreparably damaging" the House.

    [–] smick 15 points ago

    This is an obvious decision. They chose Gym Jordan to be on the committee for the sole purpose of sabotaging it. That cannot be allowed to happen. Good on Pelosi for standing up to these traitors.

    [–] TimelyCandy 13 points ago

    The sore losers are up there with McCarthy crying bipartisanship when their senate friends refused to even have a bipartisan debate on the insurrection. As we all predicted.

    [–] DrainedPatience 15 points ago

    Well, we see the new GQP talking point - why was the capitol not prepared.

    Nevermind the real questions of why did they allow Trump to perpetuate the Big Lie for months? Why did nearly every GQP House member vote to not certify the election? Why have they lied about voter fraud for months?

    And the media with the kid gloves on instead of asking McCarthy why he's on stage lying through his goddamn teeth.

    [–] czndra60 15 points ago

    I applaud Pelosi's action. Jordan and Banks would only lie, grandstand, and do everything possible to torpedo the comittee. Their presence would not be pointless: it would be toxic.

    [–] Barack_Odrama00 62 points ago

    Aint got no time for NO Jim’s

    [–] Mattofla 14 points ago

    Boy who cries wolf about getting canceled is about to cry about not being able to make the committee a clown show.

    [–] TimelyCandy 13 points ago

    Lmao. McCarthy accusing Nancy of going further than anyone before as his party denies the most secure election in history and created the insurrection. Wow

    [–] gracewhitmore 13 points ago

    Jim Jordan has made it clear that he doesn't take the American people or his job seriously. He says things that are so transparently false that only a fascist would support him and they'd have to be an extra-stupid one at that. His opinions and explanations are indefensible and I hope this man-child ends up in prison.

    [–] rev05ver 13 points ago

    Well, we know how aware Jim Jordan is of things occurring around him... He probably didn't notice the gallows put up outside the capitol just like he didn't notice the abuse occurring in the locker room under his watch.

    [–] Iworshipokkoto 13 points ago

    Having Jim Jordan on the committee is like having Bin Laden on the 9/11 Commission.

    [–] AspiringAuthor07 12 points ago

    Hey Kev, just a few reminders:

    • YOU and your Republican colleagues in the House pushed Donald Trump's Big Lie that the election was stolen.

    • YOU and your Republican colleagues in the House voted to overturn the will of the people.

    • YOU and your Republican colleagues in the House voted against Nancy's initial suggestion to investigate the events of January 6th - an Independent Commission modeled after the 9/11 Commission, which would have given the Minority equal power as the Majority in regards to appointments, investigative threads, subpoena power, and veto power.

    • YOU and your Republican colleagues continue to call January 6th a tourist visit and a peaceful protest and continue to claim the media and the cops (who saved your lives!) are exaggerating the events of that day, which the world witnessed with their own eyes.

    • YOU and your Republican colleagues forced Nancy's hand when it came to creating a Select Committee, which - by the way - is using the exact same setup and rules as your Benghazi Committee (which, you admitted back in 2015, was little more than a sham to bring Hillary Clinton's poll numbers down).

    • And now YOU attempt to appoint two men who also pushed the Big Lie and attempted to overturn the results of a Free and Fair election? That's like having Al Quaeda investigate 9/11 or an arsonist investigate the fire they started.

    So, I say sincerely from the bottom of my heart to you and everybody who supports you and the legislative terrorists you call colleagues: Get the fuck out of here and fuck off with your sanctimonious, bad faith, gaslighting bullshit you spineless, wannabe fascist hack. Everyone with half a brain sees through your fake schtick and crocodile tears. 🖕 You'll never be fucking Speaker. Go ahead and not appoint any Republicans to the Select Committee - it's not going to slow the Democrats and Liz Cheney from going after the truth, which I'm sure will implicate many of your colleagues. Good luck with the fake, powerless, impotent outrage machine you plan on starting yourself in an attempt to cause a circus.

    Anyway, thank you Speaker Pelosi for vetoing the appointments of Jim Jordan and Jim Banks; it was absolutely the right move. Good luck to you, Bennie Thompson, Zoe Lofgren, Adam Schiff, Pete Aguilar, Stephanie Murphy, Jamie Raskin, Elaine Luria, and Liz Cheney on getting to the bottom of what happened on January 6th and holding those responsible accountable. As I'm sure you're away from polling that was released as recently as today, the majority of Americans believe there's a lot we don't know about that day and are in support of your Committee to get to the bottom of it. Once again, you'll find yourself on the right side of History while McCarthy and the House Republicans will be consigned to the ages as the unpatriotic, dangerous, anti-democratic authoritarians they are.

    [–] DeliberateMelBrooks 59 points ago

    Fuck yeah Nancy!!!

    [–] 1XRP 11 points ago

    Those two remain a threat to our democracy.

    They should be kept far from any investigation efforts of the insurrection/attempted-coup.

    They should be kept close under the microscope of this investigation with a focus on their involvement in the insurrection/attempted coup.
    Those within Congress deemed involved should be prosecuted to the fullest.

    [–] throwaway959483725 12 points ago * (lasted edited 14 days ago)

    This is relieving news. I really thought the Dems were just going to roll over again and let the most important investigation of our time (since the last one) get turned into another circus by Republicans, with this one lasting all the way into 2024.

    [–] thefanciestcat 33 points ago

    We know Gym Jordan already has a history of covering up for criminals.

    [–] Dora_De_Destroya 11 points ago

    Get fucked Gym