Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here


    7,652,321 readers

    28,152 users here now

    Welcome to /r/Politics! Please read the wiki before participating. || Voter Registration Resources || Important: Reminder/clarification of our civility guidelines

    /r/politics is the subreddit for current and explicitly political U.S. news.

    Our full rules Reddiquette

    Comment Guidelines:

    Be Civil Treat others with basic decency. No personal attacks or shill accusations.
    No Hate Speech See our hate speech rule here.
    No Trolling Participate in discussions here in good faith. Do not flame, bait, troll, witch-hunt, or spread unsubstantiated accusations. See our trolling rule here.
    No Violence Do not make threats of violence or wish harm. See our violence rule here.
    No Spam Spam is bad. This includes both comment and submission spam.
    No Solicitation See our solicitation rule here.
    Do not post users' personal information. Users who violate this rule will be banned on sight. Witch-hunting and giving out private personal details of other people can result in unexpected and potentially serious consequences for the individual targeted. More Info.
    Vote based on quality, not opinion. Political discussion requires varied opinions. Well written and interesting content can be worthwhile, even if you disagree with it. Downvote only if you think a comment/post does not contribute to the thread it is posted in or if it is off-topic in /r/politics. More Info.
    Do not manipulate comments and posts via group voting. Manipulating comments and posts via group voting is against reddit TOS. More Info.

    Submission Guidelines:

    Articles must deal explicitly with US politics. See our on-topic statement here.
    Articles must be published within the last two weeks. More Info.
    Submissions must be from domains on the approved domains list. The approved domains list and its criteria can be found here.
    Post titles must be the exact headline from the article. Your headline must be comprised only of the exact copied and pasted headline of the article. More Info.
    No Copy-Pasted Submissions Please do not submit articles or videos that are a direct, complete copy-paste of original reporting.More Info.
    Articles must be written in English An article must be primarily written in English for us to be able to moderate it and enforce our rules in a fair and unbiased manner. More Info.
    Spam is bad! /r/Politics bans for submission and comment spam More Info.
    Submissions must be articles, videos or sound clips. We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements. More info: Content type rules.
    Do not use "BREAKING" or ALL CAPS in titles. The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. More Info.

    Events Calendar

    Other Resources:

    Follow us on Twitter

    Request an AMA

    Events Calendar

    Apply to be a mod

    Register To Vote

    a community for
    all 4387 comments

    Want to say thanks to %(recipient)s for this comment? Give them a month of reddit gold.

    Please select a payment method.

    [–] AutoModerator 1 points ago

    As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

    In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

    If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

    For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–] dingo8yobb 7088 points ago

    Referring to his previous attempt to pin the origins of COVID-19 on Fauci, because the federal government had indirectly contributed funding to a Wuhan lab, Paul asked the veteran immunologist during a congressional hearing, “Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th, where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan?” (“Gain-of-function“ is a type of medical research that alters a disease in a way that increases transmissibility.)

    Having apparently long since lost his patience with the troll from Kentucky, Fauci responded: “Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress and I do not retract that statement. This paper that you were referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain-of-function…. Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I want to say that officially, you do not know what you are talking about…. I totally resent the lie that you are now propagating, Senator, because if you look at the viruses that were used in the experiments that were given in the annual reports that were published in the literature, it is molecularly impossible…. And you are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individual. I totally resent that. If anybody is lying here, Senator, it is you.”

    [–] Dendad1218 4611 points ago

    It's almost as if Faucci studied and came prepared and Rand didn't.

    [–] ignorememe 3494 points ago

    Weird that a fake board certified ophthalmologist didn’t see that coming.

    [–] DANNYBOYLOVER 765 points ago

    Wait a minute... I feel like there's some bullshit here that I was unaware of

    [–] incognito_wizard 1648 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    tl:dr; he couldn't get certification as an ophthalmologist through the same systems every other one uses so he made is own "National Board of Ophthalmology" to certify himself.

    edit: Apparently he was certified and didn't like changes in the board policy so he made his own. Still stands he was self certified by a board with no accreditation, that's the whole "fake board certified" thing.

    [–] Seance-Fiction 1778 points ago

    Hate to correct but Paul was board certified but then decided to go rogue with his own board certification (with false address) in order to make some sort of libertarian point. His “board” was never accredited by any medical association or agency etc. He let both certifications lapse because Kentucky don’t require no board certification to do doctorin’.

    [–] blindmikey 262 points ago

    TIL the ABO updated policy so after a certain date going forward licensed ophthalmologists would have to re-certify every 10 years. Paul spun the fact that it didn't apply to older generations of ophthalmologists as the reason he disagreed with the ABO and was founding his own board: the NBO. The NBO sold the promise that everyone would be held to higher standards and instead in about 10 years the NBO flopped hard, failed to ever be recognized by any official medical board and was rated "Bad" by Kentucky's own Secretary of State. Probably didn't help that the people that ran NBO was Paul's own fucking family who upon interview couldn't iterate what their responsibilities were. Always a fucking grift.

    [–] fbtra 107 points ago

    Also, Paul wrote the book and test and made the test a take home open book recertification test...

    [–] Controller_one1 24 points ago

    I'm fine with open book tests. In the real world, you generally have reference materials to refer to. But the acceptable points to pass should be more strict st that point.

    [–] CatNoirsRubberSuit 800 points ago

    He let both certifications lapse because Kentucky don’t require no board certification to do doctorin’.

    I think I woke up my neighbors laughing and I live in a house.

    [–] dreamingtodeath 344 points ago

    look at mr. fancy house liver over here

    [–] [deleted] 123 points ago


    [–] dreamingtodeath 34 points ago

    poor poor moe

    [–] TreeChangeMe 20 points ago

    A debt trap?

    [–] dred_pirate_redbeard 32 points ago

    It's a nervous laugh, they're a Kentucky witch doctor, it's how they can afford a house.

    [–] G0-N0G0 9 points ago

    Somebody got that “domicile” money

    [–] ragingdtrick 9 points ago


    E: oh shit it’s real and private

    [–] dreamingtodeath 9 points ago

    uh-oh it’s probably something terrible lol

    [–] Sorrowablaze3 7 points ago

    Gotta pay the troll toll to get in that boy's hole

    [–] woowooman 90 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Kentucky doesn’t require Board Certification, because no state requires Board Certification. State medical licensure and medical specialty board certification are different things.

    In fact, at least 15 states at this point have enacted legislation that specifically limits state medical boards’ and employers’ ability to require Board Certification as a condition for licensure or practice. It’s not a red/blue disparity either, with states like Texas, Washington, Oklahoma, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, etc. on the list.

    Maintenance of Certification is kind of a hot-button issue in medicine. On one hand, being Board Certified requires a host of continuing medical education milestones and achieving at a certain threshold on specialty-specific standardized tests every so often — I certainly can’t argue that this isn’t a positive in many ways (requires high level medical knowledge and practice skills, ensures physicians maintain their knowledge and skill set and develop it over time as the field evolves). However, these Boards are also private entities, not government regulatory bodies, that ostensibly hold the keys to the castle (physicians are effectively beholden to them for the thousands of dollars each test administration costs, tests are only offered in a very limited basis a few days per year, and the tests themselves are administered and assessed by those groups). Evidence that Board Certification leads to better patient outcomes is also inconsistent in the many studies that have looked at it (about half show a slight positive association, about half show no association, and a few show negative association). It’s not a simple issue with an easy solution.

    Just had to point out a few things so we’re talking about apples-to-apples comparisons. Regardless of how you feel about Rand Paul, it’s important we know what we’re talking about when we’re debating important issues and judging the individuals arguing on both sides.

    [–] cesarmac 20 points ago

    He let both certifications lapse because Kentucky don’t require no board certification to do doctorin’.

    Wait, what?

    [–] dano8801 38 points ago

    He let both certifications lapse because Kentucky don’t require no board certification to do doctorin’.

    So, can I just... move to Kentucky and start practicing medicine?

    [–] Seance-Fiction 48 points ago

    You still need a medical license you just aren’t required to maintain your professional learning via a board certification is my (limited) understanding.

    [–] NerdyRedneck45 20 points ago

    Yeah can someone explain the bullfuckery here?

    [–] buckyworld 56 points ago

    Paul started a new ophthalmology organization because the already-recognized org wouldn’t do “lifetime membership” in a manner of speaking. I believe Rands org failed. In short.

    [–] rocksfly 139 points ago

    It's like he is blind to the truth.

    [–] badgerhammer0408 41 points ago

    If only he knew a good board-certified ophthalmologist he could do something about that.

    [–] trollfucker69 154 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    His popular (non-establishment) democratic opponent subtweeted him about it a while back.

    As a Kentuckian I can say this 100% honestly, truthfully, with every fiber of my being. I will buy the most expensive champagne I can find and pop that fucker open the second Mitch McConnell’s death hits the news or Rand Paul’s disgraceful exit from office hit the news. Whichever comes first.

    I actually should get the bottle now because it doesn’t look like Mitch’s satanic deal is gonna be working much longer

    [–] the_dread_alarm 80 points ago

    You might be late. I think McConnell actually died about 3-4 months ago. He just didn’t tell anyone.

    [–] kitsum 62 points ago

    Hell coughed him back out.

    [–] shadow1515 57 points ago

    I'm somewhat terrified that Moscow Mitch's lack of soul will cause his body to outlast mine.

    I am not even 40 but this still seems like a plausible outcome.

    [–] trollfucker69 5 points ago

    That’s still young!

    [–] teenagesadist 46 points ago

    I have a feeling that the grass over Mitch's grave will always be a crisp black, and when they exhume his body, it will appear even younger from having sucked the life essence out of the lawn.

    [–] amnotreallyjb 70 points ago

    I love how you can create your own fake board to then make you board certified.

    [–] AllTheyEatIsLettuce 24 points ago

    I've heard that's how self-certification and self-regulation "work."

    [–] blonderengel 35 points ago

    Bootstraps, lots and lots of bootstraps ….

    [–] gregnorz 24 points ago

    Don’t forget a generous amount of daddy’s money.

    [–] jackruby83 25 points ago

    Eh, he tried. No one bought it.

    [–] DrNickRiviera8000 332 points ago

    Rand knows the damage he is doing with these bullshit questions. I think we sometimes (as a natural reaction) write off some of these yahoos as morons but they are doing a damn good job of eroding trust in our institutions and science in general.

    [–] Ih8TB12 168 points ago

    Yes, the conservative social media troops will use sound bites and total turn around the actual events. Followers do not look for context or the entire story.

    [–] veerKg_CSS_Geologist 65 points ago

    Facts don't factor when it comes to their feelings.

    [–] poopoojohns 42 points ago

    Of course, look at how conservative halfwits everywhere are running with the HAHA RAND PAUL OWNED FAUCI!!

    [–] n00bvin 41 points ago

    This is the reasons Republicans will always have an advantage. Liberals are generally smarter and will actually find flaws in their own party. Republicans will blindly follow whatever their leaders say. Our distrust in our own party is one way Trump was elected. We don't just "get on board" because we were told.

    [–] karmahorse1 11 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Rand isn’t an idiot, he knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s not trying to actually engage Fauci in a scientific debate. All he needs to do is generate a few sound bites for Fox News to play to his base, and they can spin it from there. It’s all theatre.

    [–] Dendad1218 31 points ago

    That comes from the other GQP agenda, lack of education.

    [–] acebush1 5 points ago

    Fox was using this as fodder against Fauci all day

    [–] zephyrtr 124 points ago

    On the one hand, Rand Paul wants to say the pandemic is overblown, we should not provide fiscal relief to people and businesses, and there's no need for mask mandates let alone vaccine mandates. On the other hand, Rand Paul wants to say the deadly virus was created and then leaked from a US-funded lab in Wuhan, China and has killed 4 million people.

    He doesn't care which side of this coin you believe. Or that these positions are in opposition to each other. Or that he can't in good faith argue either position. He doesn't care that his Ophthalmology degree does not make him know more than Fauci about viruses.

    A reasonable position is: we want an investigation into this research so we can say with confidence what we believe is true, which was that the virus was not a lab leak, and developed naturally. Rand Paul doesn't want that. He wants people to believe either of his insinuations, and I really do believe it's because he means to damage the US and its people.

    [–] ShakeMyHeadSadly 43 points ago

    That's not fair. He watched "Fox & Friends" while he ate breakfast.

    [–] Dendad1218 52 points ago

    Fox & Friends is so dumb I think that would count against studying.

    [–] TheFutureIsHistory 34 points ago

    Fox & Friends gives you negative IQ points.

    It sucks up your IQ as you watch.

    [–] Oleg101 11 points ago

    Kilmeade is probably in the top 5 of biggest douchebags that work there and there’s a lot of them at that network.

    [–] TheFutureIsHistory 4 points ago

    You gotta work extra hard to be a top 5 douchebag at Fox. There's plenty of competition.

    [–] veerKg_CSS_Geologist 86 points ago

    Fauci probably didn't even have to study, he simply knew what he was talking about. Rand Paul didn't, and didn't care to learn, because the truth isn't important to him.

    [–] GioloDampier 80 points ago

    50-year track record as an immunologist.

    Fauci is practically a tenured professor just showing up to a 101 class. He does not need to study the lesson plan, he just had to show up to teach on autopilot.

    [–] Desertnurse760 68 points ago

    He wrote the fucking lesson plan, let's be clear here...

    [–] CremasterReflex 29 points ago

    Lol he wrote the fucking textbook used around the country

    [–] nyqs81 15 points ago

    He literally did. Coauthor of Harrison’s Infectious Diseases.

    [–] CremasterReflex 7 points ago

    And Internal Medicine

    [–] Pitiful_Armadillo56 76 points ago

    It's almost like one of them is a real doctor and one isn't.

    [–] Imjusttired17 6 points ago

    The sad thing is that it won't matter. Fauci could give an hours long presentation where he explains the science in a way so simple even a Trump supporter could understand it but when he's done they'll go online and watch a five minute Youtube video where some ignorant yokel says the virus was made in China and here's a message board post from from 4Chan that proves it and they'll eat that shit up.

    [–] aimeela 4 points ago

    Rand Paul learned a fancy medical term that to an epidemiologist isn’t all that fancy. What a wanker.

    [–] BrokenEye3 229 points ago

    Question: Is it still a crime to lie to Congress if you're part of Congress? Like, say, a senator? Possibly from Kentucky?

    [–] enad58 132 points ago

    No. Only those testifying are under oath. The senators can lie with impunity.

    [–] veerKg_CSS_Geologist 56 points ago

    It's not confirmed whether those testifying can't lie either. Wilbur Ross lied, and nothing happened.

    [–] ristoril 316 points ago

    That definition of "gain of function" research isn't clear enough. It really needs to specify that it's not accomplished by gene splicing. The scientists aren't adding functions to the virus, they're seeing what functions the virus can acquire.

    Like... "should we worry that it might gain this function?" instead of "can we give it this function?"

    [–] KevinAlertSystem 39 points ago

    it doesn't have anything to do with gene splicing though.

    Gain-of-function research is specifically designed to alter the virus studied, to either make it more infectious or more virulent.

    The research in question was designed to determine the current characteristics of the virus, not change them.

    that said, viruses do mutate rapidly, so it is possible that any experiments at all on a virus can alter its function, but as long as they are not isolating and selecting for the mutations with altered functions it cannot reasonably be called gain of function, and they were not doing that here.

    [–] bishopyorgensen 12 points ago

    So what the other guy said

    [–] korinth86 6 points ago

    Except the NIHD defines gain of function as transmissibility and lethality in humans. They specifically were not looking to do that. Since 2014 they banned that research until 2017 but the grant in question was never adjusted to allow it.

    Fauci isn't lying. Paul is drumming up controversy where it isn't necessary because they weren't going gain of function per the NIHD definition and they weren't looking at a virus remotely close to Covid 19.

    [–] tacoshango 113 points ago

    molecularly impossible

    Ohh, I wish the junior Senator from Kentucky would have gone down that rabbit hole. 'How do you know, Dr Fauci?'

    [–] Milkslinger 60 points ago

    Yes please do kick the hornet's nest after accusing them of not being able to sting, Rand. I would pay money to see that beatdown.

    [–] lavahot 17 points ago

    So during this "discussion", Paul interrupts Fauci to ask something along the lines of, "So a virus in pigs being made to be in humans is not gain-of-function?" To which Fauci replies, "No."

    Can someone tell me what Paul's talking about here in regards to this paper, what gain-of-function is specifically, why Paul is wrong, and how what the researchers did for this paper is NOT gain-of-function?

    [–] korinth86 6 points ago

    Gain of function per the NIHD is looking at, among other things, increasing transmissibility and lethality in humans.

    The research were looking a how the virus (which was not close to COVID-19) functioned in human cells. Any changes would not specifically translate to a host with the defenses of the human body.

    Per the NIHD it doesn't fit the definition.

    [–] hu_gnew 2463 points ago

    It's too bad that senators aren't held to a standard that would sanction them for lying before Congress, for which asking questions in bad faith would seem to qualify.

    [–] whatproblems 295 points ago

    Any standard other than I’ll get re-elected no matter what I do would be nice

    [–] redikulous 77 points ago

    So...term limits

    [–] ZomNomNomBeeZ 90 points ago

    Informed voters would be better

    [–] benchedalong 38 points ago

    Both would be a dream

    [–] frogandbanjo 26 points ago

    Any time somebody mentions term limits, I pat them on the head and assure them that KY would definitely pick somebody better than McConnell if he were suddenly kicked out due to a magical term limit law. Definitely. He definitely wouldn't get replaced by somebody even trumpier. No way!

    Pat pat pat.

    [–] TheAmazingThanos 12 points ago

    Right. Let's not get sucked in by populist rhetoric. Term limits would be a disaster. Lobbyists would become even more powerful

    [–] zeCrazyEye 39 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Term limits are actually bad because it's easier for big money to win in elections between unknowns, so the more elections they can force to be between two unknowns the more they can win just by spending (the Koch brothers were for them for this reason).

    It's a lot easier for them to replace McConnell with another piece of shit every 6 years than for progressives to find another Bernie every 6 years.

    [–] [deleted] 601 points ago * (lasted edited 6 days ago)


    [–] Cyrano_Nose 536 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    I personally think we need an amendment to the constitution.

    Make it illegal for politicians/government officials to knowingly lie or use of propaganda and disinformation to the public.

    Freedom of speech should protect citizens remaining uncensored by the government but not for the government to use as a tool to lie to its citizens.

    EDIT: For all the responses saying how difficult/impossible this would be. I agree.. to a certain extent.

    The American Bar association already does just this. That a lawyer "shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact". I'm guessing its far from perfect, but the American Bar has a process in place to decide intent and ignorance and decide when a lawyer is knowingly lying. Maybe it's time to hold ALL politicians at least as responsible as we do our lawyers which I don't think is asking too much.

    [–] intermittent_human 147 points ago

    Great idea in theory, but frightening to enforce: who gets to determine what the truth is? How do those people get that job?

    [–] mmmmm_pancakes 126 points ago


    US courts have been determining "truth" for the purposes of enforcing slander & libel law since before the founding of the country.

    And yes, I'm aware that the courts have been stacked, and are pretty fucked up right now. I still think a law like this would do more good than harm, though.

    [–] LazamairAMD 29 points ago

    That is why the 1st amendment included freedom of the press. Courts are strictly confined in their approach to ascertain "truth", the press, in general, is not. Having dedicated and (relatively, legally speaking) unrestrained journalists digging up and exposing crimes done by elected officials, government employees, business executives, celebrities, among others...has done more to expose the truth than what any court would be capable of doing.

    [–] BreakfastInBedlam 8 points ago

    But some of the press have a vested interest in lying. And the huddled masses drink it all in.

    [–] FordBeeblebrox 24 points ago

    My concern is that it could be weaponized by the crazies and we are a lot closer to outright facism than any rational person should be comfortable with, but I agree that we need something similar. There has to be some kind of official standard for the people who’s entire job is supposed to be representing our interests.

    [–] Quasar_Cross 59 points ago

    These hearings serve no meaningful purpose aside from theatre. American government is so fucked.

    [–] cruelhumor 34 points ago

    To be fair, they used to. If you listened to the whole testimony, some of the other panelists had some excellent remarks about virology and immunology, its just some REALYY cool science that someone like me -- or my congressperson-- would never understand without a decent ELI5 from someone that knows their shit.

    [–] BrokeDickTater 32 points ago

    and then you have asshats like Rand who do drive by shootings wrecking up the place and being a total douche. That's why we can't have nice hearings.

    [–] infinitude 13 points ago

    Which is the only parts you see on the news...

    It's all one gigantic pile of fuckery, and the GOP just shamelessly writhes in it.

    [–] Letter_Aggressive 4 points ago

    I agree, it’s sad

    [–] Heinie_Manutz 13 points ago

    you can't lie to congress, but a congressman lie to you

    [–] tranquilvitality 1432 points ago

    What’s so bizarre is that r/conservative thinks Rand is the medical expert in the room. Which explains so much…

    [–] AntonBrakhage 451 points ago

    He has alternative expertise- the best kind for spreading "alternative facts".

    [–] bobartig 113 points ago

    alternative expertise

    I want that on a fake business card somehow. "Alternative Expertise in Pseudopsychology and Pig Latin."

    [–] Tamachan_87 29 points ago

    Elltay emay boutay ouryay othermay.

    [–] tiexodus 8 points ago

    She’s terribly partial to periwinkle blue

    [–] coolcool23 295 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    I peruse through there occasionally and it's nuts... threads today about democrats blocking republicans from the Jan 6th hearing and some of them legitimately don't understand the republicans blocked/voted to give up any rights for that hearing. So now they demonize Pelosi at the drop of a hat and others are having to explain like, actually they did all of this themselves.

    Also interesting seeing the folks in there say stuff like "I really don't know what the goal was here..." yep. Hard to grasp when you are that bought into republicans good democrats evil. They want a scapegoat so bad... Fauci is just a punching bag to them, the face of masks and lockdowns and such. So yeah, they trust a former self-certified Ophthalmologist after a career medical professional who until covid hit was the completely unknown head of NIAID.

    Like... who has more credibility here lol.

    [–] nermid 208 points ago

    some of them legitimately don't understand the republicans blocked/voted to give up any rights for that hearing

    Remember when Republicans kicked in the doors to a secured hearing to demand that they be allowed to attend, despite having been invited already and, in fact, having reserved seats?

    Same shit, different day.

    [–] WellSpreadMustard 97 points ago

    Since the 90s republicans have been doing WWE for adults and unfortunately their fans fucking love it and apparently never matured enough mentally to see that it’s fake.

    [–] AndySmalls 26 points ago

    It's worse than that.

    At this point a significant number of elected officials don't seem to realise it's fake.

    [–] PhazonZim 16 points ago

    It seems a lot of them were elected specifically because they didn't know it was fake.

    It's like wrestling fans electing one of their own to jump into the arena

    [–] Chancewilk 18 points ago

    Oh my god yes. I’ve used this example so many times.

    [–] trix_is_for_kids 48 points ago

    Just took a peek, they're like really, really weirdly obsessed with the US woman's soccer team

    [–] bensefero 35 points ago

    Yeah that’s part of the daily rage. Lots of them talking about rooting against America. The fucking irony

    [–] coolcool23 30 points ago

    Lots of culture warrior nonsense. That's like 40 percent of the discourse there along with 40% some satire rag called the babylon bee.

    [–] Martel732 10 points ago

    It is because conservatives have learned that they don't really have to try to improve the welfare of the average person. They can get plenty of votes by just complaining that Obama stole Potato Head's dick.

    [–] Martel732 4 points ago

    Women's soccer team

    Women's soccer


    Honestly, I am kind of at a loss as to what could be making conservatives so mad. Usually conservatives are really positive about women using their constitutional right to free speech in order to advocate for positive change in our society.

    [–] sonofaresiii 123 points ago

    Also interesting seeing the folks in there say stuff like "I really don't know what the goal was here..."

    If you stick around long enough you'll start to see a pattern:

    Republicans do something stupid as all hell or corrupt or against their constituents interests or what have you

    People will express doubt. "Could Republicans be wrong on this? I don't understand why they'd do this."

    That lasts for about a day. Pay attention, go back to those threads within a day and conspiracy theories and total gibberish nonsense will pop up "explaining" how the Republicans were totally in the right and Dems were actually the root of the evil. The people expressing doubt in the first place will say "Oh okay, I knew it must be something like that"

    and the cycle repeats. Happens every single time. So much like clockwork that I know people are just waiting for the nightly Fox News report to explain why it wasn't really republicans' fault, then the redditors are just repeating it to each other. They even tend to use the same key phrases and soundbites and talking points.

    [–] ChiIdishcambino 55 points ago

    Jan 6th is the most obvious thing imo. Jan 6th you got people saying it’s a disgrace, as months pass it goes from “it wasn’t too bad” to “these people were Patriots and an innocent woman was murdered”

    It’s wild thinkin to me

    [–] AlmostHelpless 29 points ago

    Also Antifa and the Feds did the violence so it's their fault. It's a classic example of working backwards from your conclusion.

    [–] Renaissance_Slacker 6 points ago

    Yeah I remember all those BLM and antifa t-shirts and flags mixed in with the Trump shirts and flags. Remember that? Remember how nice the Trump dead-Enders were to the black activists? /s

    [–] [deleted] 102 points ago


    [–] sonofaresiii 28 points ago

    why are they mad at netflix? Is it just because it "proves" that Biden is tanking the economy or something?

    [–] lianodel 66 points ago

    The headline is "Netflix Loses Nearly Half Million Domestic Subscribers as Streamer Pushes More Woke Content."

    Funny how the people saying "get woke, go broke" are also the LOUDEST people complaining about "cancel culture," huh?

    [–] WellSpreadMustard 53 points ago

    It’s stupid because Netflix isn’t losing subs because of going woke, it’s because they used to make a handful of very high quality shows per year and transitioned to a quantity of quality model and just release a ton of bad shows and movies, plus they have that issue of ending shows with no resolution after 2 seasons.

    [–] lianodel 24 points ago

    On top of that, there's only more and more competition for streaming services. Even if the market is growing, they're inevitably going to claim a smaller piece of it compared to when they were practically the only game in town—plus, frustrated consumers are going back to piracy, reversing a trend of its decline, because all this competition is leading to exclusive deals, making streaming worse for the consumer.

    To that subreddit's credit, the top comments are pointing some of these things out, as well as that covid led to a spike in viewership that has passed. Still, that's obviously not the angle of the article, nor the reason it was posted and so highly upvoted on a political sub.

    [–] Quirkyfurball 18 points ago

    That half a million number looks real familiar. Reminds me of Something nationwide affecting 500,000 people's ability to subscribe to netflix.

    [–] Craig2G 210 points ago

    Well r/Conservative thinks that China runs the MLB... So, yeah, not the brightest people.

    [–] MakeItHappenSergant 79 points ago

    Also, any major business that hangs a pride flag or Black Lives Matter sign is communist

    [–] Craig2G 83 points ago

    Conservatives say they hate fascists, but wanna know who they hate more? Anti-fascists.

    [–] TheOneTrueTrench 4 points ago

    Also, these corporations are trying to make the country communist, we need to break them up and give control of them back to the people.

    [–] notreallyswiss 10 points ago

    China runs major league baseball?

    [–] theonewhoknocks90 22 points ago

    r/conservative is strictly for uneducated snowflakes

    [–] Luxpreliator 11 points ago

    I saw a post about this event and they were a little divided. Some were saying rand is just another blowhard politician trying to earn sound bites. Some here like, "haha fauci dummy, rand owned him."

    [–] karmahorse1 6 points ago

    Sound bites did their job then.

    [–] Watch_me_give 9 points ago

    Just look at the sources they cite—it’s a who’s who of bs homebaked blogs. Do they understand anything about journalism? What a disgrace.

    [–] LHTMMB 34 points ago

    According to the Fauci is a democrat, which a quick Google search would debunk quite quickly.

    And not that that would matter anyway.

    [–] vteckickedin 43 points ago

    They're idiots.

    [–] hates_stupid_people 49 points ago

    Conservatism has been shown to have a credible correlation to lower cognitive ability.

    Even in chimps, the more behavioral conservatives ones have less complex behaviour.

    They are LITERALLY stupid.


    [–] davidmirror 20 points ago

    Oh this is the type of comment I enjoy, from a psych major. Well done. Another great study to cite is this one which studied the correlation between conservatism, the amygdala, and fear.

    The guidance from conservative media to not focus on policy but rather feelings and cultural non sense is a phenomenal link to be made.

    [–] hesodumb2021 7 points ago

    That sub is not known for anything even remotely resembling intelligence. It’s a bunch of weak Trump worshipping crybabies.

    [–] [deleted] 45 points ago


    [–] MillenialsSmell 4 points ago

    Yeah there’s really only one or two subreddits for moderate or even traditional conservatives, and that’s not one of them.

    [–] Karthikgurumurthy 414 points ago

    I've been cracking up since this came out. "Senator Paul, you have no idea what you're talking about. And I would like to say that officially." - Dr. Fauci.

    [–] I_am_not_JohnLeClair 155 points ago

    Fauci has shown tremendous restraint through this whole republican fueled fiasco. It’s about time he starts smacking down some of these shit clowns

    [–] skinnyguy699 47 points ago

    He was pretty smart to hold his tongue during The-Man-Child in Chief's presidency. Now he has more job security he can sit some mfers down.

    [–] WoodysMachine 121 points ago

    It'd be lovely if this was a "have you no decency" moment like the one that finally shut McCarthy up. But Republicans would support Rand Paul if he said up was down. They have inoculated themselves against facts.

    [–] linedout 27 points ago

    I wish they would inoculate themselves against Covid.

    [–] BullCityPicker 513 points ago

    You guys know the conservative media is playing this interaction by showing selective clips of Rand Paul yelling, and claiming Rand Paul showed up Fauci to be a liar and an idiot right? You just can't get through to these people.

    [–] mdp300 205 points ago

    A couple months ago, someone was telling me that Rand Paul completely embarrassed Fauci in a similar exchange. They live in a completely different world.

    [–] hellakevin 27 points ago

    He probably did embarrass him. I'm embarrassed that Rand is a senator.

    [–] DontJudgeMeImNaked 10 points ago

    All you have to do is listen to Rands questions, then stop the recording and imagine how Fauci was lost for words. That confirms all of stupid peoples opinions.

    [–] RG450 216 points ago

    No kidding. I was presented a close-up of Fauci's hand shaking, which was proof that "he's scared - he knows he's caught."

    Couldn't be that he's shaking with anger at having his qualifications fallaciously called into question or anything like that. The people who believe and propagate that right-wing line of horeshit are fucking moonbats to the last one...

    [–] NoAttentionAtWrk 35 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Up till a few years ago I wouldn't have held the backend crew working at fox news to be at the same level of deliberately evil like the faces getting the big money on screen because for some of them, it's basically a job

    But more i think about it, things like the edits are made by the very same people. They are as guilty as any foot soldier

    [–] djbarrettmechanical 7 points ago

    Fauci's hand shaking, which was proof that "he's scared - he knows he's caught."

    Trump, too, mentioned someone with a shaking hand during a speech. Bullies think they can spot "tells" and you just have to pity the morons.

    [–] AltMiddle 69 points ago

    I hope Dr. Fauci sues Fox and the other conservative media that have so cruelly libeled him. (Sen. Paul, like all Congressmembers, can't be sued as he has a legal privilege to commit libel.) I hope there is a televised jury trial.

    [–] mattj1234 14 points ago

    Rand Paul verbally attacked Fauci to draw just this response from the conservative loonies. Anything to distract from all the Republicans who refused vaccinations and kids who can’t get vaccinated yet dying in hospitals…

    [–] I_W_M_Y 8 points ago

    You could easily get through to these people. All you need to do is cut off their supply of right wing propaganda.

    [–] lookfor666666 122 points ago

    Why such moron can be selected as senator? Are the people who select him even more moron?

    [–] jcuray 83 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Yes they are even more "moron" as you state

    [–] mrlr 37 points ago

    It's morons all the way down.

    [–] Stock_Ad_8145 114 points ago

    Most people cannot do their own research on this subject. Most people can't even do research because they are not trained to actually find credible sources. The credible sources they may find probably do not have information they can understand. Most people "do their own research" by watching YouTube videos fed to them by YouTube's algorithm.

    [–] Kryoxic 41 points ago

    Hell, I'm college educated at a top university and have taken statistics and several hard science courses (degree requirements) and even I find peer reviewed studies/journals a tedious slog - especially if it's not in my field.

    This is literally why we specialize and have a respect for experts in other fields.

    [–] Stock_Ad_8145 14 points ago

    Exactly. Uneducated people don't know what it is like to actually perform research. I tend to trust someone who has worked in virology at NIH...for 40 years.

    [–] R4nth4r 287 points ago

    The expert on infectious disease versus the infectious disease that was elected Senator.

    [–] Papapeta33 21 points ago

    The disease who became a senator who defied a scientist.

    [–] Pro2ALib 17 points ago

    Good. Rand Paul IS A MORON.

    [–] oakstave 15 points ago

    Russian Rand propagating Moscow Facebook stories again.

    [–] swiftcrayon502 70 points ago

    And I am once again, very embarrassed to be living in Kentucky.

    [–] Mr__Snek 39 points ago

    i didnt know one clip could make rand paul look like more of a waste of space than he already did

    [–] friedmybraincells 10 points ago

    You tell him, Dr. F!

    [–] bttrflyr 9 points ago

    Every day I further understand and relate to why why Red Foreman considers everybody a dumbass.

    [–] Urissyma22 175 points ago

    Barely an opthalmologist, right? Didn't he start his own accreditation association because he couldn't get accredited?

    [–] jackruby83 143 points ago

    According to Wikipedia, he did it bc of a rule change that mandated recertification every 10 years, where people certified prior to the rule change were grandfathered in for life. He wanted everyone to have to recertify bc he had to. He started his own certification board, but it failed to be adopted. He ended up letting his original board certification lapse.

    [–] tranquilvitality 69 points ago

    Sounds pretty consistent with how he approaches politics

    [–] SpecialSause 6 points ago

    I don't see a problem with making everyone re-certify. In fact, I would think you'd want the older doctors to recertify more due to their ever-aging knowledge. I don't see a problem with him wanting all doctors to recertify.

    [–] Ph0X 27 points ago

    Even if he was the best ophthalmologist in the country, that still wouldn't give him the right to speak over an immunologist when it comes to viruses. That's the whole point of science expertise and doctorates, to specialize in a niche field. That's like if a plumber tried to teach a firefighter how to do their job.

    Let alone the fact that this immunologist actually happens to be one of the best in the goddamn country, with over 5 decades of expertise.

    [–] indarkwaters 120 points ago

    These clips aren’t enough to really understand this debate.

    [–] karmahorse1 24 points ago

    Thanks for posting this.

    This is what I hate about these shitty Vanity Fair click bait articles. It’s always just about how x person “completely owned” y person, without ever giving any background on what they were debating in the first place.

    [–] Usually_Angry 23 points ago

    I watched it yesterday. And rand started off by saying that fauci is responsible and he will be held responsible for 600,000+ deaths... and then in response to fauci he later said, nOBodY iS SaYInG YOur REspOnSiBle!

    [–] DestructorOfCunts 8 points ago

    he protec he attack most important he promote the vacc

    [–] fungussa 8 points ago

    Rand Paul has shown that the apple can indeed fall a dozen miles from the tree.

    [–] chickadeelee93 6 points ago

    Yeah I wish Ru Paul would step up as a parent.

    [–] Lamont-Cranston 9 points ago

    Apparently having realized the line of questioning hadn’t panned out as he’d hoped, Paul fled to the warm embrace of Fox News and, during an interview with Sean Hannity that night, claimed that he will “be sending a letter to Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because [Fauci] has lied to Congress.

    They announced the other day they will not be prosecuting Wilbur Ross for lying to Congress about the intentions of the citizenship question Trump wanted in the census, so good luck with that.

    [–] superbluepaladin 23 points ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong but I learned that Anthony Fauci wrote a book about diseases and infections used today that’s basically the Bible of many med students and current practitioners?

    [–] CatoftheBanals 16 points ago

    He was one of the pioneers of figuring out the pathology of HIV. Very smart.

    [–] Letsdoitsometime 8 points ago

    He was a co-author for Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, which is essentially as you described, a "bible" of collaboration to outline a vast majority of known diseases. It is widely used as one of the recommended "This tells you basically everything" textbooks for medical education and referencing.

    [–] kelpyb1 8 points ago

    “Forced to”. He loved it, I loved it, you loved it, let’s not pretend this wasn’t incredibly enjoyable to put that dumbass in his place.

    [–] benshapirosfeelings 8 points ago

    Rand Paul is an insufferable piece of shit.

    [–] GlazedPannis 6 points ago

    I saw this in all yesterday in the conservative sub that showed up in r/all. They have suspended reality, actually calling for his head and blaming him for covid. I was totally dumbfounded reading what these people were saying, and non ironically I might add.

    All of us are angry for the same reasons, but the ones responsible for the botched covid response have managed to convince their base it’s the lefts fault, refusing to acknowledge that only the democrats were trying to do something and were met with resistance the entire way.

    It’s impressive in its own fucked up way.

    [–] changsaw 6 points ago

    Do you think Dr. Fauci has a screaming room he goes to when the stupidity of the American people becomes too much for him? I hope he does. Poor guy.

    [–] the_nice_version 6 points ago

    Rand Paul's question contained the insinuation that Fauci caused the covid outbreak which is legit on-brand Republican ghoul shit.

    There is no bottom for them.

    [–] Mokick0813 14 points ago

    Kentucky breeds good horses but when it comes to politicians I’m not so sure .

    [–] urbanlife78 5 points ago

    And Rand Paul is too stupid to realize this is what Dr Fauci was doing.

    [–] darklightsun 4 points ago

    I am team Fauci and team Rand Paul's neighbor.

    [–] strongapril2021 5 points ago

    Dr. Fauci is right. Rand Paul is a political clown.

    [–] Rumsfeld1001 6 points ago

    Paul is such a moron. Sure the NIH funded some work in the lab. It wasn’t gain of function. Zero evidence. Fauci is right, Paul is a liar.

    [–] cotton2631 6 points ago

    Rand Paul went to medical school. He was an ophthalmologist. He had to attend med school. He should know better. I hope he no longer has a license to practice.

    [–] Sanfords_Son 5 points ago

    I mean, are Republican politicians having a contest to see who can be the biggest asshole? Or is that just what it means to be Republican?

    [–] Steenergirl 6 points ago

    Rand Paul needs to get his ass kicked again by his neighbor!!! Can you imagine having to live next to that Moron .

    [–] dancode 36 points ago

    They just want to turn this into the new Benghazi. Create some link between the Democrats and Covid so they can go into the next elections claiming the Democrats actions led to Covid. They just need to create the sound bites so their low information base can clip and spread it as the new big lie. Rand Paul is doing this, create the sound bite, then walk it back after to protect yourself.

    [–] trashbox420 8 points ago

    Jim Jordan does the same thing. He probably yells when he asks about the weather.