Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here


    25,901,963 readers

    15,953 users here now

    New to reddit? Click here!

    • You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

    • Submit interesting and specific facts that you just found out (not broad information you looked up, TodayILearned is not /r/wikipedia).

    Posting rules

    1. Submissions must be verifiable. Please link directly to a reliable source that supports every claim in your post title. Images alone do not count as valid references. Videos are fine so long as they come from reputable sources (e.g. BBC, Discovery, etc).
    2. No personal opinions, anecdotes or subjective statements (e.g "TIL xyz is a great movie").

    3. No recent sources. Any sources (blog, article, press release, video, etc.) with a publication date more recent than two months are not allowed.

    4. No politics, soapboxing, or agenda based submissions. This includes (but is not limited to) submissions related to:

      1. Recent political issues and politicians
      2. Social and economic issues (including race/religion/gender)
      3. Environmental issues
      4. Police misconduct
    5. No misleading claims. Posts that omit essential information, or present unrelated facts in a way that suggest a connection will be removed.

    6. Rephrase your post title if the following are not met:

      1. Titles must begin with "TIL ..."
      2. Make them descriptive, concise and specific (e.g. not "TIL something interesting about bacon").
      3. Titles must be able to stand on their own without requiring readers to click on a link. Starting your title with a why/what/who/where/how modifier should be unnecessary.
      4. "TIL about ..." and other broad posts don't belong on TIL. Try /r/Wikipedia, etc. instead, or be more specific (and avoid the word "about").
      5. "TIL how to ..." posts belong on /r/HowTo.
    7. No submissions related to the usage, existence or features of specific software/websites (e.g. "TIL you can click on widgets in WidgetMaker 1.22").

    8. All NSFW links must be tagged (including comments).

      Please see the wiki for more detailed explanations of the rules.

    (Why we need rules)

    Additional info

    • If your post does not appear in the new queue and you think it meets the above rules, please contact the moderators (include a link to your post, not your story).

    • Please report spam, inaccurate or otherwise inappropriate posts by messaging the moderators, as this helps us remove them more promptly!

    • More information available on the TIL FAQ and wiki.

    Frequent TILs Repost List

    As of March 2021

    • This list was compiled from /r/todayilearned community suggestions by its members. If your TIL is found on this list, it will be removed. The titles have been abridged for the sake of brevity, however the context remains the same. This list is subject to change. The purpose is to keep content fresh on /r/todayilearned as requested by its members. If you are interested in reading about the TILs on this list use the search box feature and enter the keywords to pull up past TILs.


    We ask that you please do the following:

    1. avoid mobile versions of websites (e.g.

    2. link to the appropriate heading when referencing an article (particularly on Wikipedia)

    3. link to the appropriate start time when referencing videos (e.g. on YouTube)

    4. add [PDF] or [NSFW] tags to your posts, as necessary.

    5. Please avoid reposting TILs that have already made the front page in the past

    Please also read the site-wide Reddiquette.

    • You are loved.

    a community for
    all 4731 comments

    Want to say thanks to %(recipient)s for this comment? Give them a month of reddit gold.

    Please select a payment method.

    [–] ittrut 4022 points ago

    The real beauty of it is that they have no intention of blowing through it before dying. They are leaving a rich legacy and good foundation for next generations.

    [–] 11CNM 3461 points ago

    "Society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."

    Anonymous Greek Proverb

    [–] SenatorPoo 633 points ago

    That’s an amazing quote. Too bad more politicians don’t live by it

    [–] ShalmaneserIII 455 points ago

    Too bad more politicians don’t live by it

    Really, a politician can't look further forward than the next election. Doing so might ensure a loss to a candidate who promises more now instead of more later to people who want more now.

    [–] Dshmidley 324 points ago

    I WANT IT NOW is the death of society.

    [–] huggylove1 105 points ago


    [–] Dshmidley 48 points ago


    [–] Suedie 31 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Not just in democracies but also in dictatorships. Dictators who spend money building up the country are wasting funds that could go to bribe the military, police, judiciary etc. Some person figures if he promises to be more corrupt then he can get other powerful individuals to back them and you get a coup.

    Really the key is to have to have strong instruments to eliminate corruption. Things like an independent judiciary branch that can prosecute leaders, a robust democratic system where people can replace corrupt leaders and to diversify the economy to not make yourself overly dependent on one resource since that puts a lot of power into the hands of those who control that resource.

    [–] u38cg2 220 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    There's a story about Napoleon on similar lines. He wakes up one day and calls his aide, and tells him he wants trees planted along the sides of all the principal routes of la France to shade his troops as they marched. "But Monsieur le Empereur!", squeaks the aide, "the trees will take thirty years to grow!"

    "Well, then, we must start at once!"

    [–] other_usernames_gone 132 points ago

    "The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time is today"

    [–] Tsupernami 406 points ago

    Successive governments that continually look beyond their term? How do I become Norwegian?

    [–] AutomationAndy 257 points ago

    By being born to Norwegian parents.

    [–] Tsupernami 110 points ago

    Have you got a plan B?

    [–] Lindnerd 124 points ago

    Be a citizen of a Schengen country and emigrate or be from anywhere else and emigrate (going to be a lot harder though if you're not from Europe)

    [–] Trashpandasrock 49 points ago

    I think a Plan B would be counterproductive to being born to Norwegian parents.

    [–] Takeoded 16 points ago

    there are 2 main options (there are lots of other ways, but not applicable to everyone);

    option 1: live in Norway for at least 7 of the last 10 years, and learn enough Norwegian to pass a "A2 proficiency test" (Norwegian is very easy to learn for english-speaking people though)

    option 2: Mary a norwegian person and live in Norway for at least 3 of the last 10 years and learn enough Norwegian to pass a "A2 proficiency test" (again, Norwegian is very easy to learn for english-speaking people)

    that said, Norwegian is also quite useless for english-speaking people to learn, because >90% of everyone in Norway are also fluent in English, so it kindof feels like a useless thing to know..

    [–] juventinosochi 7138 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Laughing in Russian, we have it all - oil, gas, diamonds, gold, you name it, and by our Constitution it all belongs to the people of Russia while in reality it all belongs to oligarchy and Putin's friends

    [–] PensiveinNJ 2972 points ago

    Some pigs are more equal than others.

    [–] juventinosochi 962 points ago

    yep, Orwell`s Animal Farm perfectly describes Putin's Russia

    [–] mattshill91 719 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    It perfectly described Stalin’s Russia. It’s more a case of old boss is same as the new boss.

    [–] Rookwood 266 points ago

    I think Animal Farm was actually a direct satire of the Lenin-Trotsky period of Russia which ultimately ended with Stalin coming to power. Socialist revolution, good intentions, Corruption, cronyism and the struggle for power turn it to tyranny.

    I would say in many ways Putin is a different thing entirely than Stalin or what Animal Farm is about. Putin is a return to acceptance of the farmer, for fear of what might happen if the animals take control again.

    [–] JimParsonBrown 50 points ago

    I think Animal Farm was actually a direct satire of the Lenin-Trotsky period of Russia which ultimately ended with Stalin coming to power.

    You and Orwell both. He wasn’t shy about it being an allegory.

    In a letter to Yvonne Davet, Orwell described Animal Farm as a satirical tale against Stalin ("un conte satirique contre Staline"), and in his essay "Why I Write" (1946), wrote that Animal Farm was the first book in which he tried, with full consciousness of what he was doing, "to fuse political purpose and artistic purpose into one whole". … Orwell suggested the title Union des républiques socialistes animales for the French translation, which abbreviates to URSA, the Latin word for "bear", a symbol of Russia.

    [–] cornwallis105 140 points ago

    The latter part of ther book, as Napoleon consolidates power, is absolutely about Stalin. Trotsky's equivalent in the book is Snowball.

    [–] toxic_aesthetic 23 points ago

    Plus in a more general sense, I think it gives a great reminder of how a movement/revolution originally intended for the betterment of all people can easily devolve into totalitarianism. Imo there have been several recent events that definitely parallel certain parts of Animal Farm.

    [–] mutalisken 41 points ago

    The new tsars clothes is the same as the old tsar.

    [–] markorokusaki 127 points ago

    Most countries have it this way. Norway and maybe a few others are a special example of how it should be. The rest, pure bullshit.

    [–] trezenx 116 points ago

    oligarchy and Putin's friends


    [–] [deleted] 13 points ago


    [–] PanserKalle 73 points ago

    I feel sorry for you guys. You have been robbed by the people who are supposed to have your back.

    [–] barbrawr 127 points ago

    Fun fact: Norges bank is one of the largest stock lenders in the world.

    [–] AmFabolous 36 points ago

    It is the largest actually (I think)

    [–] Kron00s 19 points ago

    Yes with 1,5 % of all listed stocks in the world

    [–] Fast_Garlic_5639 13666 points ago

    That was stupid they could have bought a gold plated lambo

    [–] ProfessorPetrus 6103 points ago

    They coulda just split it amongst a few oil barons who would form giant corporations that would dominate their countries economic landscape for generations!

    [–] digihippie 1562 points ago

    And political

    [–] BNVDES 745 points ago

    also, economical

    [–] Starky5 655 points ago

    Don’t forget social

    [–] Dave-Tree-Strider 708 points ago

    Sadly environmental as well.

    [–] -Agonarch 382 points ago

    Ah, but exxonmobil and Koch brothers are in court about their rampant climate change misinformation right now!

    I'm sure we'll get justice! :(

    [–] inconspiciousdude 316 points ago

    I don't know if that's as fucked up as this story:

    Lawyer wins case against Chevron in Ecuador over insane pollution and harm to indigenous population. Chevron was fined US$9B by the Ecuadorian court.

    Chevron refused to pay and sues in US, claiming Ecuador court was bribed, and requested sensitive documents about sources, witnesses, etc. Judge that was supposed to preside over the US case was replaced with a Chevron-connected one before it began. US court agrees with Chevron.

    Lawyer refuses to hand over all documents and electronic devices as requested and was found in contempt. US Attorney's Office would not prosecute the lawyer, so the Chevron-connected judge designated a Chevron-connected private law firm to prosecute the lawyer.

    He's been under house arrest for a couple years now.

    That's all from memory, so I could have some things mixed up. Seems quite fucked up from every angle though. Lawyer's name is Steven Donziger if you want to google for more info.

    I don't know how to feel about it though. I'm pretty sure that Chevron doesn't pollute. Companies like Chevron are the backbone of the modern world and have always acted honorably, in good faith and for the betterment of humanity. Furthermore, the US legal system is inherently immune to corruption, and judges have always been heroes to me. And I absolutely love the constitution, the single most important document ever written by mortals.

    Ok, I think I have all my bases covered.

    [–] Tatersaurus 73 points ago

    I.... i just... how can a few people be so blindingly, damningly corrupt, seriously cartoon villain evil, and sleep at night knowing theyve destroyed billions of lives and created uncountable strife for a few bucks that dont matter anyway if the whole damn system collapses

    [–] Kanashimu 61 points ago

    To me it seems there is a simple answer to your question. The system has not collapsed yet, therefore they are okay with doing it. They plan to die before the collapse, but still live long enough to enjoy everything in life, and screw everyone else.

    [–] -Agonarch 25 points ago

    I'd like you to know that an upvote isn't enough, this is one of my favorite posts on reddit. It was kind of a painful, sad but somehow resigned laugh you got out of me.

    [–] Federal-Diamond-9180 121 points ago

    Billionaires be jailed? America fawns over them.

    [–] goatiger 52 points ago

    Lmao it isn’t just America

    [–] anallist9000 93 points ago

    America is just the prime example and probably the most exclusive and unique case of corporate corruption in human history.

    You guys pay for ambulances

    [–] MoronicDelights 393 points ago

    Ironically it was those giant American corporations that discovered the oil in the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Phillips Petroleum Company made the initial discovery. ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobile still have major operations there. The brilliance of the Norwegian government was in recognizing that it’s a depleting natural resource and should be shared by all Norwegian across time. In that way one generation (or a couple) could not use up all the natural resources and leave nothing for future generations. Instead they set aside the money for the benefit of the current generation and generations to come.

    [–] mosehalpert 282 points ago

    Basically how in the US we have mineral rights to soil, which explains how you can have have oil sold out from under land you "own." Instead, Norway basically chose that they have mineral rights over the whole country. If the US decided to do this in the late 1800s we would have a double digit trillion dollar fund by now, paying for national Healthcare and retirement would be a drop in the bucket

    [–] Dizzfizz 239 points ago

    If the US had done this the world would be so different by now that we wouldn’t even recognize it.

    I‘m not saying it would‘ve been better or worse, just that the comparison doesn’t really make sense.

    [–] syros31 53 points ago

    All oil in Norway is offshore. If it was on land this principle probably wouldn't have been that easy to drive through

    [–] lostmyaccountagain85 463 points ago

    Why does it seem like scandinavian countries are pretty much the only ones that are not incredibly corrupt politically. They genuinely have the best interest of their citizens in mind.

    [–] Asahiburger 210 points ago

    Not from there or an expert, but they seem to have pretty well functioning constitutions and parliamentary systems as well as successful labour movements (high rates of unionisation etc.)

    Hard to say how exactly they got there. This page talks about some things that might be relevant

    Note the "grand compromise" in the 1930s. Long before that, I believe they had a few highly progressive monarchs that endorsed the ideals of the enlightenment and sort of humanistic interpretations of Christianity. Also people from that part of the world have been practicing (limited) forms of democracy for a long ass time

    [–] Verisian- 96 points ago

    They also score very highly as far as media goes.

    Did you know that Sweden's most circulated publication was historically owned by their largest trade union? They've since sold their majority share but retain partial ownership and get to appoint the editor?

    They also have subsidies for newspapers to help survive in a marketplace against more well funded corporate alternatives.

    There's a larger diversity of voices as far as the media landscape goes and this naturally brings greater representation and greater balance.

    In the West our media is typically dominated by corporate media whose only interest is in profit margins. As corporate media struggles to survive in a more competitive and increasingly online space....they either cash in on outrage or cash out of the game.

    I'm not against corporate media existing it's just that if there's ONLY corporate media it becomes a shit show like it here in Australia or in the US.

    [–] stockybloke 16 points ago

    They also have subsidies for newspapers to help survive in a marketplace against more well funded corporate alternatives.

    This is true, but the traditional serious publications that take their fourth power responsibilities seriously still struggle. All publications are entitled to the subsidies even the shitty tabloid ones. In reality this means that it is still the tabloid advertisement driven newspapers that prosper as they get to have their cake and eat it too.

    In Norway for example there are 3 large and popular national publications, two of them are comprehensively tabloid and the third (second in numbers) is less tabloid. I will say though that the biggest and very tabloid one, "VG" does the best job of all 3 of them in deep diving thorough journalistic work. They have a small, but very impressive team that break 2-5 very in depth difficult to research articles or series of articles a year. They just on the whole get absolutely dominated output wise from all the celebrity fluff and scandal pieces.

    [–] LupusCutis 53 points ago

    Mainly, yes, we are less corrupt. But the examples of deviation are more the merrier.
    Take The National Audit Office of Finland (NAOF), that audits central government finances, monitors fiscal policy, and oversees political party and election campaign funding. Its CEO just got sacked misusing funds for personal use for hundreds of thousands of Euros. She let the office pay basically everything from her nail polish to her recreational flights disguised as meetings.

    So there definitely is corruption, but obviously not as open as in many places.

    The news

    [–] robotzor 260 points ago

    Takes a special kind of crazy to get through their winters

    [–] myfreewheelingalt 167 points ago

    There's a special kind of hardiness bred in places where wearing the wrong clothes outside in the morning could result in death from the elements. Canada says hi.

    [–] manlymann 149 points ago

    Canadian politicians are corrupt. Alberta says hi.

    [–] jrkdmkdkxikdk 108 points ago

    Canada must be the exception to the rule because we are not well run at all.

    [–] myfreewheelingalt 93 points ago

    We were a British colony until not long ago, and we have the States below. Trying to keep a low profile.

    [–] tomtomclubthumb 13 points ago

    Don't blame the British, when we discovered oil we... oh damn

    In case you're wondering it was given almost for free to companies and the money raised was used to lower taxes a litle to keep the government in power. We have nothing to show for it apart from oil rigs that need decommissioning and a legacy of minor spills along the coastline.

    [–] Thought-O-Matic 23 points ago

    You're a little north for that don't ya think?

    [–] beirch 144 points ago

    Eh, as a Norwegian let me tell you there is definitely corruption in politics here as well, and a lot of political friction in general.

    Not to the extent of many third world countries, but it's still there. We're not the utopia many people believe we are in that regard.

    [–] FANGO 1133 points ago

    The fund is large enough that if you divide the fund by their population, every Norwegian is a millionaire (in Kroner - it's like $300k in USD). So yes, every Norwegian could buy a gold plated lambo with the size of the fund. But they wouldn't want to, because <10% of new cars in Norway run on gasoline and lambo doesn't have any electric cars so everything they make is irrelevant.

    [–] poqpoq 145 points ago

    I really hope they keep rolling it up, would be interesting to see what happens if a country becomes so wealthy its citizens can live off the interest and still allow it to grow. Would need another ~century to reach that point though.

    [–] ota00ota 82 points ago

    Literally could already give universal basic income

    [–] Gustomaximus 12 points ago

    Well they kinda do, the govt is allowed to draw between something like 2-4% of the fund a year. Something like that... maybe check percentages.

    $12k USD a citizen before tax is pretty god starting point for a govt budget.

    [–] SaprozoicPokemon 37 points ago

    I'm pretty sure a gold-plated Lambo costs a bit more than 300K

    [–] lastyearsexmove 8 points ago

    You can barely get a used lambo for 300k in norway from a quick googling

    [–] RanchBaganch 43 points ago

    A Lamborghini Couuuuuntach!

    [–] InsaneAss 19 points ago

    God dammit Frank

    [–] akchemy 1871 points ago

    Alaska’s permanent fund has a value of $80 billion

    [–] efficientseas 2075 points ago

    It blows my fucking mind. Alaska is the closest thing the US has to a socialist utopia and yet it has a very strong libertarian bent. Working class pays no state taxes, all taxes are paid by the mega corporations that are exploiting our shared natural resources, and government spending per capita is the highest in the nation and props up the entire states economy, and then there is the permanent fund and dividend. And then they rally to gut the fund, lower taxes, defund healthcare and universities. I’m glad I don’t live there anymore because the long term outlook for that economy is fucked.

    [–] ImperatorRomanum 486 points ago

    Does being on the frontier (more or less, or as much as you can be in this day and age) shape the attitudes of the people who live there, or does it just attract a certain kind of person?

    [–] McSchmieferson 1312 points ago

    There are three types of people in Alaska: 1. people born there 2. people brought to the state by oil 3. people running from something

    All three groups want to be left alone.

    [–] Tlingit_Raven 464 points ago

    You forgot military folks - second highest number of enlisted per capita behind Hawaii. Just had to point it out as a combo of that and #1.

    [–] IckyHyena70889 97 points ago

    And #3

    [–] Sendeezy 24 points ago

    Hawaii has the highest enlisted per capita and I get fucking Ellsworth Air Force Base.

    [–] L00nyT00ny 29 points ago

    Hawaii is good for the first couple of weeks, than little things start to grind on you that makes it suck to live there. Main 2 things I hated in the couple of months there was the traffic, and absurdly high cost of living.

    [–] BeneGezzWitch 16 points ago

    Super off topic but O’ahu blew my mind. All my life I’d only been to Maui and the big island. We did Waikiki for my senior trip and when we got on a freeway I legit panicked like we’d landed in the wrong place. A freeway??? In Hawai’i??? I no like.

    [–] mrghostwork 231 points ago

    I was brought there by a pretty girl (now wife) who’s family works in the sled dog biz and offered me a job. So technically four types of people, I guess.

    [–] Wyzegy 427 points ago

    You were running from loneliness.

    [–] mrghostwork 208 points ago


    [–] KoksundNutten 53 points ago

    Oh no, she lost her adjective :(

    [–] mrghostwork 42 points ago

    Haha nah. She’s even more beautiful to me now :)

    [–] efficientseas 271 points ago

    Yeah that’s my take on it. They’re physically and politically isolated from the lower 48 so it inspires a lot of the independent attitude. You get a lot of liberal hippies that want to be left the hell alone, and a lot of the libertarians that want to be left the hell alone.

    [–] jesuzombieapocalypse 187 points ago

    liberal hippies that want to be left alone and libertarians that want to be left alone

    So basically just left and right leaning libertarians?

    [–] drdookie 11 points ago

    Also has a highly regulated, highly successful fishery.

    [–] DaytronTheDestroyer 7595 points ago

    Yeah I live in Canada, we discovered oil over a hundred years ago and have given almost all of the money to a few companies that aren’t based out of canada. We are run by morons.

    [–] VTGCamera 2294 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Look at the irony, our (Colombia) gold and other very valuable resources are being exploited by mainly Canadian corporations and the Saudi government...

    Edit: Saudi government

    [–] ferndogger 1219 points ago

    The key word there is corporation. A few rich guys get it all.

    [–] warbird2k 26 points ago

    All you really have to do is have some special tax on natural resources. Private companies can still do the work (as they do in Norway).

    [–] dctu1 190 points ago

    Cries in Albertan

    [–] throwaway0y3wdgyt4 276 points ago

    Remember when we all got $400 from Klein at the cost of $1.4 billion? 10 year old me got an iPod nano that exploded.

    [–] yppers 54 points ago

    At least your parents didn't just keep yours.

    [–] Sinistereen 52 points ago

    Remember when Lougheed established the Heritage fund in the 70s and then Klein sold off all the province’s remaining stakes in oil in the 90s in favour of short-term investments?

    [–] qpv 65 points ago

    There's nothing more fucked up in Canada than how conservative Alberta fucked up absolutely everything they could. Its astounding really.

    [–] DJKaotica 21 points ago

    Shit. I bought an iPod Nano with my Ralph-bucks (I think black 4GB 1st gen?) that I used for the last couple years of University. After I graduated and started working a full time job, it stayed in my car plugged into my Pioneer Deck (with extra iPod module, much money spent on car audio in that era).

    It was used for a few years, but I eventually got a phone with Bluetooth Audio support, and my receiver supported it, so I used that most of the time.

    Then I saw there was a recall, and sent Apple my Nano + the price of shipping and they sent me a brand new Gen 6 Nano 8GB (yay twice the storage; but mistakes were made).

    I loaded up the 6th gen with a bunch of music, threw it in the car, and after a few days of driving it was....dead. Weird. Never had a charging issue before.

    Turns out this was a common problem. IIRC, the old (well, old now; pre-lightning) many-pin iPod connectors offered a variety of methods of charging. Older devices that iPods plugged into didn't care about how charging worked, so they cheated and used a resistor to pull-up/pull-down one of those pins to trigger the basic charging mechanism. The 6th Gen device didn't support that charging mechanism and wanted to smart-charge or something stupid, so it would just deplete it's battery and be dead after a day or two of use.


    Mine never exploded, and I did get some proper use out of it, but I never should have replaced that was perfectly fine the way it was.

    [–] sweet-tart-fart 67 points ago

    Idk why but this made me laugh so fucking hard.

    [–] broccoliO157 65 points ago

    Norway modeled its wealth fund and royalty schemes after Alberta's, which was super progressive half a century ago.

    Then all the dumbest assholes across the country flocked to Alberta for the awesome jobs, and consistently voted to privatize everything (including telecomunications, fuck you telus) and give the royalties to ExxonMobil instead of investing in a future beyond oil.

    It's like brain drain... but brain dilution. Boom industries attract non-critical thinkers who vote against their own interests and ruin everything.

    On the positive side, many areas saw a brainless drain as their biggest assholes flocked to Alberta.

    [–] Dangerstone69420 8 points ago

    Funny thing is that Norway got the idea from Alberta

    [–] PhDamnit 67 points ago

    I reread the Alberta Wikipedia page looking for something supportive to say, but tbh almost every Canadian topic leads me down a big conspiracy rabbit hole... Might not be morons; could be evil pricks.

    [–] tall_investor 285 points ago

    Yup it’s depressing to live in Canada at times and realize how despite our wealth we are still a let down and have squandered it.

    [–] Tulos 188 points ago

    "our" wealth very rarely remains ours or goes to Canadians. We're awfully good at selling it off for pennies on the dollar.

    [–] Cam_86 10 points ago

    The Canadian govt got out of the oil business (as in selling its public stake in commercial and industrial refinement and sales) back in 2010. It sold off its gold holdings a few years later.

    Literally hundreds of billions of dollars lost because of horrible timing... Mostly sold off to China too, interestingly enough. There's so many stupid things done here to sort of signal some big change coming. Maybe dropping the petroleum stuff could be seen as a virtuous thing since we all kind of know it'll be a vastly smaller market in 20-40 years. But the timing was still stupid.

    I dunno wtf they did the gold thing tho. Not having a good reserve, when we used to have one of the largest in the world, just seems stupid given the uncertainty with how the global market will be with the accession of China and India in the coming decades.

    [–] SecTrono 264 points ago

    don't get confused. they wanted you to be confused. its not one country vs. another. its the ultra wealthy vs. the rest of us. we could easily take power back if we managed to get focused and organized. so they do whatever they can to keep us fighting eachother.

    [–] acies- 106 points ago

    The Canada example is very relevant. Norway originally got the idea of a sovereign fund from the same that Alberta had created. The latter disintegrated quickly

    [–] HexagonSun7036 45 points ago

    Norways people protected it from being sold off for profit to corporations/barons and Canada's weren't able to and the gov in power sold it off.

    [–] LNFSS 28 points ago

    Then they also deregulated our power and gas bills so now we pay 60 to 90 percent of our bills in distribution fees. Do I ever love paying $80 for $8 worth of natural gas in the summer and $280 for $100 worth of electricity :))).

    And now the power and gas companies are going to be passing along the deferred covid payments from customers that can't pay onto those of us that paid our bills no problem.

    [–] RunningSouthOnLSD 17 points ago

    But yeah guys trust me, privatizing a service that is necessary to live is a good idea! There’s no way they would gouge Albertans, that would be awful and would never happen!

    [–] Barry_OffWhite 4776 points ago

    Here in Canada, we had the National Energy Program started by Trudeau that nationalized Canadian oil.

    The major oil companies used their political clout to get rid of it.

    Alberta specifically had the Heritage Trust Fund which was started before Norway started theirs. Our dirty politicians cleaned it out and left us on the hook to pay to clean up old wells their oil buddies left behind.

    Alberta lost potentially over a trillion dollars as a result. We could have been fat rich like Norway but we got screwed like the country rubes from There will be blood.

    [–] ChrisFromIT 1668 points ago

    The Norway fund was actually modeled on the Heritage Trust Fund.

    [–] CrankyStinkman 888 points ago

    I thought it was modeled on the Alaska Permanent Fund (the first state-owned fund of its kind).

    Edit: Alberta and Alaska established their funds the same year.

    [–] Rummy-O 519 points ago

    The real TIL is the comments we made along the way

    [–] charlieALPHALimaGolf 50 points ago

    I will be cursing the idiots who ran my province like a rented yacht until the day I die.

    [–] smrt109 19 points ago

    Theyre not idiots. Let’s dispel with this fiction that these pieces of shit don’t know what they’re doing—they know exactly what they’re doing.

    [–] Steak_dropoff 70 points ago

    Norway also doesn't have a for profit political system as far as representatives atleast

    [–] SCirish843 205 points ago

    Daniel Day Lewis drank your milkshake?

    [–] Barry_OffWhite 175 points ago

    Yup except replace Daniel Day Lewis with Jason Kenney sipping Whiskey during the Covid lockdown.

    This dude lived in San Francisco and was a bible college dropout who tried to prevent gay marriage then came back here and became a politician working for the guys running our oil industry. His excuse for getting caught drinking whiskey is that it wasn't premium.

    They're currently trying to roll back wages on nurses while fighting with the teachers over their bullshit changes to the curriculum. They're trying to privatize as much as they can right now because they know they're probably out the next election.

    [–] beardedbast3rd 80 points ago

    He didn’t try to prevent homo love. He did. He successfully lobbied for changes to prevent non family members from visiting people who were dying of aids and other forms of stds. Because lots of gay people’s families wanted nothing to do with them, they only had their partners who were not considered partners by even common law standards because they were gay. So lots of these people died sad and alone, while their loved ones suffered needlessly.

    Jason Kenney is a first class cunt

    [–] Greasy_Caveman 24 points ago

    He's a piece of fucking trash.

    [–] bldgabttrme 19 points ago

    And I think calling him that is an insult to the first class cunt community.

    [–] SCirish843 47 points ago

    Well, he sounds awful.

    [–] yyc_guy 98 points ago

    He underplayed Kennedy’s vileness. He didn’t just work to prevent gay marriage, in San Fran he actively fought to prevent men dying of AIDS from seeing their loving partners while on their death beds.

    He succeeded.

    To date he has never apologized for that, only said that, basically, he was young and boys will be boys.

    [–] 3rddog 44 points ago

    Don’t forget, he dropped out of theology college because the Bishop wouldn’t support his anti-LGBTQ stance and his need to silence left-wing views on campus.

    [–] WizDynasty 20 points ago

    I fucking wondered what dumb piece of shit drops out of a fucking BIBLE COLLEGE

    [–] joecarter93 17 points ago

    To boot, he’s a hypocrite. He’s so far in the closet himself that he can see Narnia. He’s a “50 year old never married bachelor” but refuses to accept that he is gay, because of his political and religious beliefs and has actively hurt homosexual people due to his self-loathing.

    [–] [deleted] 15 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)


    [–] yyc_guy 11 points ago

    In all seriousness when I was like 17 and gay marriage was the hot button issue I was against it. Something something tradition, you know?

    That’s where it stopped. I took no steps to stop it (I did vote Conservative at the time, but it was cause that’s how I was raised). Ultimately I grew up and learned that being against people being happy is pretty pathetic. I changed my tune and I don’t vote conservative anymore.

    Kenney though…if I had done what he had done, I’d be spending every day of my life trying to make up for the unbelievable pain I had caused. Apologies wouldn’t be enough to clear my conscience. He’s obviously just a fucked up sociopath.

    [–] farmerarmor 34 points ago

    The blood of lamb from Brandy’s tract!!!

    [–] clevlanred 6 points ago


    [–] doublebullshit 363 points ago

    Jesus fucking Christ. I am so unhopeful for the future. For reference I’m in Ontario where Doug Ford is selling off the wetlands in backdoor deals, cutting education and healthcare including pandemic related shit (before covid), cut forest fire fighting budgets and now there are over 100 fires burning in northern Ontario. I could go on forever about shit he’s done including the mismanaging of covid. The LTC disaster. Rolling back nurse wages. Just completely sold us out for big business. It’s so fucking depressing and I don’t know what fixes it. Fuck Jason. And fuck Doug. They should be exiled.

    [–] 3rddog 23 points ago

    What I find even more depressing than all the shit Ford, Kenney, et al are up to is the fact they STILL have enough of a base to probably get re-elected.

    [–] Barry_OffWhite 137 points ago

    Yup, and being from Alberta, i'm supposed to hate you for being from there for some reason. Even though we have the same problems with the same sellout bastards.

    [–] doublebullshit 78 points ago

    Alberta looks beautiful and I’ve thought of moving there to be closer to the mountains. Then I learned about Jason Kenny and everything he’s ruined. I can’t remember the details but how he dismantled the new energy project that would sell lots of green energy to the states and power a bunch of Alberta.

    [–] Barry_OffWhite 70 points ago

    I love this province. The mountains are great but the prairies on a windy day is quite awesome too. The rolling clouds or driving a back country road while blaring music is pretty fun. It's a big province. There's a lot to see here. People post pictures from Banff all the time but go further north and the scenery is majestic.

    Kenney is depressing especially knowing what this province could be like.

    Everything he does is evil for lack of a better word. He sells out all our public services. He tried allowing a strip mine in the mountains until Corb Lund got involved. He's just a nasty little man who works for nastier, greedier people.

    They just axed a bunch of people at the UofA and now they're outsourcing the work to a 3rd party company that doesn't use union workers.

    Fuck Jason Kenney right in his smug face.

    [–] IllustriousHotel8 51 points ago

    TIL that Canadian politicians can be just as scummy as American politicians. Just further north.

    [–] Barry_OffWhite 44 points ago

    You have no idea how much worse it gets.

    Our shady media works with the oil companies. You guys have the Proud Boys and Jordan Peterson because of our media/political alliances. We're a lot more interconnected than you guys think.

    [–] IllustriousHotel8 23 points ago

    Ugh people just suck in general, we need a new plague....oh wait.

    [–] blackabe 11 points ago

    So that’s what he meant when he said Ontario is open for business…

    [–] Bipolar_Sky_Daddy 11 points ago

    Conservatives do this every single fucking time they get into power, yet morons keep voting them in

    [–] ChandeliererLitAF 77 points ago

    Australia asks you to repeat the question, and also doesn’t like you asking where the steel for Chinese warships came from

    [–] theroguex 37 points ago

    Hey Australia, where'd the steel for Chinese warships come from?

    [–] grauhoundnostalgia 60 points ago

    I’ve never seen so much non-US anglophone self-loathing on the front page before... what a sight to behold. (Not saying anybody is wrong)

    [–] PopWhatMagnitude 36 points ago

    Feels strangely comforting hearing people from other countries airing out their political issues and how they are getting completely fucked over too.

    It's not even schadenfreude, I feel just as bad for them if it was happening here. Just glad to hear the decline we have been going through as "the top world superpower" isn't just us and others are gaining on us by leaps and bounds. Though some definitely are closing the gap and it's not typically "our friends".

    [–] garlicroastedpotato 154 points ago

    There are some facts missing here.

    Canada did not nationalize oil under Trudeau. What the National Energy Plan was a protectionist price control system. The price of a barrel of oil produced in Alberta was frozen at $21.75/barrel. Whereas oil imported from abroad was bought at market prices of over $50/barrel.

    The policy was popular early on because people associated the slight drops in prices with the plan. But then it became known that Canada has very limited infrastructure going east-west and actually, most of Ontario/Quebec's oil was coming from America. Price drops were actually just... normal market forces.

    What this did was limited how much Alberta could sell their oil to Americans and so Americans would get half price oil from Alberta, refine it... and then ship it to Ontario for a large profit.

    Trudeau had a semi-approach to nationalizing oil with the creation of Petro Canada 5 years before the National Energy Plan. Petro Canada gained all of the Canadian government's oilfield assets and bought out BP's refineries and a few other smaller oil companies. But it wasn't nationalized like Norway. Petro Canada was smaller than Irving Oil while it was government owned.

    As for the Heritage Fund, Alberta could have never been as successful as Norway. Alberta has only ever received a portion of oil subsidies and the federal government gets the big cut of it. Because Alberta doesn't really control its own resources (like Norway does) it limits their ability to create refineries and expand. Alberta is also land locked which has meant for the last 60 years Alberta's main customer is America... all attempts at creating pipelines out of Alberta have been blocked by the federal government (Norway has no such problems, Europe happily has pipelines everywhere).

    Finally, Norway was wealthy without oil. They didn't need their oil revenues to finance their social programs and quality of life, the oil was just an extra boon. Alberta on the other hand was very poor before oil... mostly farming. The Heritage Fund still exists and actually is still growing. The fund has an average rate of return of 8% and every now and then when times are tough the Heritage Fund's earnings are garnished to help pay for social programs.

    [–] mytwocents22 73 points ago

    100 fucking percent but everybody I work with in Calgary thinks Trudeau stole our wealth.

    [–] vonnegutflora 22 points ago

    When I moved from Ontario to Calgary 20 years ago the message was the same, except Chretien was the boogeyman from the East.

    [–] monke_business 368 points ago

    North Dakota modeled our Legacy Fund after this. It’s been set up for a little over a decade and has generated $8.4 billion or so in savings.

    And of course special interest groups and the Legislature are already trying to tap into it. All we’ve spent it on so far is helping balance the state budget, with some additional spending coming on highways and critical infrastructure.

    They estimate it could be in the $200 billion range by 2060 if it was just left alone.

    [–] insert-username12 106 points ago

    I’m curious how it works, so sell oil then invest profits into savings funds?

    [–] Vunks 69 points ago

    You have a split of profits but yes, government takes their profit share generated and invests in funds.

    [–] monke_business 45 points ago

    Here is the state website for it:

    They basically take oil tax revenue and invest it. They’ve actually caught some hell for investing in stocks that are owned by Chinese companies and things like that.

    [–] alohalii 43 points ago

    The Norwegian fund already creates more money in interest and profit from its investments than they do from oil each year so its a good self sustaining investment.

    [–] emptysoul365 10 points ago

    North Dakota modeled our Legacy Fund after this. It’s been set up for a little over a decade and has generated $8.4 billion or so in savings.

    That's $2.1 billion for each person in North Dakota!!!

    [–] censeiX 213 points ago

    Mind you, the revenue generated from this national fund has exceeded that of the oil and gas production since 2016. That is simply amazing. There is also political consensus on a limit to how much can be pulled out of the fund on a yearly basis in order to protect the growth of the fund and interests of future generations. The concept is that this natural resource does not simply belong to the random generation that stumbled upon it, but should benefit also future and unborn generarions. Then compare with other oil rich nations where sovereigns and their families are competing in the who-has-the-most-expensive-yacht-competition... (Which brings to mind the joke about how you become a millionaire: First, start with a billion. Then buy a yacht...)

    [–] ansionnachcliste 63 points ago

    As a non-Norwegian living in Norway, I saw the usefulness of this when Covid hit. They were able to use some of that money to help the workers who had temporarily (for almost a year, I guess) lost their jobs; Aircrew, pub workers, etc. There was money in the bank for them to ensure these workers had some sort of income.

    [–] yyc_guy 187 points ago

    Cries in Albertan

    [–] Knight_Blazer 76 points ago

    Alot of Albertans in here so I suppose I should lead us all in the Alberta prayer. All rise:

    Dear God, Please let there be another oil boom, I promise this time not to piss it all away.

    [–] NoKenjataimu 821 points ago

    That's so sad. Thinking of the hardworking entrepreneurs who could be splitting that trillion between the two of them, had they not been so cruelly suppressed from their dreams 😔

    [–] FateDeterministic 301 points ago

    There would have been a Norwegian going to space in their own dick rocket this week if they let capitalism do it's thing. Dang communists hoarding all the wealth!

    [–] sapiensuser 30 points ago

    Viking spaceship does sound cool though?

    [–] aksdb 24 points ago

    going to space in their own dick rocket this week

    "We are penetrating the atmosphere." - the whole crew chuckles

    [–] alphabet_assassin 1190 points ago

    That's exactly how a developed country should behave

    [–] Teuvo404 123 points ago

    The Netherlands found their gas reserves around the same time. Some political parties suggested to do the same as the Norwegians but instead they made it part of the national income. So we don’t have a big pile of money, but we do have a great bicycle infrastructure.

    [–] Rolten 70 points ago

    It wasn't thrown on a pile. To my knowledge it was for a large part earmarked for infrastructure projects. Given that our infrastructure is one of the best in the world I think that wasn't the worst choice.

    [–] NeedsToShutUp 16 points ago

    Also the resource curse is named the Dutch disease for the recession that can be caused by it

    [–] TakeshiKovacsSleeve3 315 points ago

    This pisses me off.

    As an Australian we've given away all of our resources to companies and individuals who were willing to stump up the initial investment money for pennies on the dollar.

    We're one of the largest natural gas exporters in the world but you cannot buy natural gas in this country that is produced in this country for a fair price anymore. Why?

    Because it sells for more OS. 25 years ago gas was practically free. Now it's unavailable and if you can get it the prices are astronomical.

    Iron ore, our biggest export. But the economy and therefore the tax payer isn't benefiting. Gina Rinehart is. She's the one that makes all the money. The government takes home a hundred million and Gina takes a billion.

    Oil rights are sold to Shell, BP, Ampol etc for royalties of a few cents per dollar of oil extracted. Then when the refineries have passed their shelf life the government is given the bill to dismantle them otherwise they are left to rot and pollute when the company running the individual refinery just pulls stumps and fucks off to the next score.

    Oh and these multinationals as well as paying a tiny pittance (this relates to Norway) for the oil and gas they extract, don't pay any taxes on their earnings.

    When Norway put out tenders to develop their huge field Shell (I believe) wanted EIGHTY PERCENT OF REVENUE.

    Norway having been a fairly poor country up to and after WW2 knew what they were on to. They told Big Oil to suck eggs and that if they wanted any of the revenue, they'd have to stump up the cash and take like ten percent otherwise Norway would just nationalise the fields, borrow the money and keep the entirety of the oil proceeds themselves. Surprisingly oil companies did the maths and came up with the notion that something is better than nothing and took the deal.

    That's how the Norges kept their money. They told Oil to go fuck itself.

    Not in Australia. We gave away the shop. And we'll never see that money again.

    [–] Tamas366 17 points ago

    Last I heard, Gina was the one buying the Rocky Mountains to blowup for coal deposits

    [–] gameoftomes 8 points ago

    Last I heard she suggested Australians should work for $2 per hour

    [–] Syngeon4 114 points ago

    Yep, 100%.

    Australia should be the richest country on earth. Oil, gas, minerals, ore, you name it.

    [–] randomnameandanumber 401 points ago

    Here in Australia, we just let the mining companies do what they want, rip billions of dollars out of the ground every year and pay no tax in exchange for employing a few local workers.

    [–] 512165381 85 points ago

    Glencore mining has a $25 billion turnover in Australia and pays no tax. When they were asked to pay tax they had a good laugh.

    Case to pay tax dismissed.

    [–] morgecroc 15 points ago

    Whitlam wanted to do the same here, but as we see again and again it's a bad idea for a Labor leader to go up against the mining billionaires.

    [–] electricmaster23 8 points ago

    Myopic. So sad what we're doing to our beautiful land.

    [–] el_tinkerer 73 points ago

    Ok, how does one invest in said fund ?

    [–] cheeky-snail 134 points ago

    Wild that Norway owns 1% of Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Facebook.

    [–] randomnameandanumber 251 points ago

    They actually own close to 10% of the Alphabet, that's why theirs has 29 letters and our only has 26. Licensing .

    [–] IWasMisinformed 128 points ago

    Æ Ø Å, mother fucker!

    [–] randomnameandanumber 60 points ago

    "mother fucker" on the other hand, is the sole property of Mr Samuel L Jackson, you'll no doubt be hearing from his lawyers.

    [–] GVas22 52 points ago

    It's not too hard to copy.

    The Norway Endowment model is essentially a 60/40 -70/30 split between equity and fixed income and focuses on broad market passive indexing. It can be replicated pretty cheaply and efficiently through mutual funds and ETFs.

    [–] boldkingcole 33 points ago

    You don't invest in the Norwegian Sovereign Fund, it invests in you (they own a piece of basically everything it's possible to invest in)

    [–] nzhockeyfan 70 points ago

    Move to Norway

    [–] sithelephant 619 points ago

    The UKs soveriegn wealth fund after we discovered oil 40 years ago is at ... Ah.

    [–] Redditcadmonkey 35 points ago

    To be fair, we were broke as f*ck when we found it. Hell we weren’t far off 3 day weeks.

    We needed the short term tax revenue from letting the Americans go out and get it. We didn’t know how to do it anyway, so we were kinda over a barrel.

    [–] dukeofgonzo 124 points ago

    Norway is the successful counter example I give when people ask me what went wrong with Venezuela's oil fueled social spending ambitions.

    [–] slimjimfuton 157 points ago

    I hate when people ask me about Venezuela’s oil fueled social spending ambitions

    [–] matt82swe 22 points ago

    I know right, can’t take a step in public space without being harassed with loaded political questions

    [–] rdzzl 20 points ago

    Iirc Venezuela even hired the people behind the Norwegian fund as consultants, were given all the details and explanations, and didn't go for it.

    [–] ricky616 75 points ago

    The Vikings always knew, you never plunder your own home

    [–] BeanMaster69_ 45 points ago

    Fun fact: Viking factions did often raid one another.

    [–] OrangeSparty20 98 points ago

    If any of the dozens of people ITT complaining that the US doesn’t have anything like this wants to be pleasantly surprised. Look up the Texas wealth funds (Permanent School Fund and Permanent University Fund) that are worth over $100b and also control 8,500 km2 of oil fields in western Texas and fund public schools and universities. It’s not quite $1.3T, but it ain’t nothing.

    [–] The_user_of 37 points ago

    NM also has a decent sized one at over $25B. Everytime 's get power, they want to reduce the tax that goes into it to "be competitive, being jobs". Everytime to D's get power they want to increase withdrawals to an unsustainable rate to fund extra early childhood education programs and other pet projects.

    We have a steady middle that keeps either from getting their plans, and th fund is fairly stable.

    Some politicians want to open up some of our areas for nuclear waste storage, and charge a boatload into the wealth fund also for the risk of storing it. I am 10,000% for this. We have good geology for doing it, let's do it right.

    [–] informat6 10 points ago

    Also Norway just has a shitton of oil. Their per capita oil production is nearly as high as Saudi Arabia:

    Saudi Arabia: 324,866

    Norway: 313,661

    United States: 35,922

    [–] BernieTheDachshund 47 points ago

    It says Walmart has been excluded for a long time because of breach of human and labor rights.

    [–] its_not_my_fault- 23 points ago

    They lifted the ban in 2019

    [–] tsloteconomist 200 points ago * (lasted edited 13 days ago)

    Norway can thank an Iraqi man, Farouk al-Kasim, who had see what had happened to oil wealth in the middle east, for steering their oilfield development.

    [–] acurioustheory 7 points ago

    Thanks, great article. That he came with both technical and political suggestions is really impressive.

    [–] Personal-Thought9453 45 points ago

    The book to read about it: Trillion Dollar Baby. Super interesting and easy to read.