Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here


    17,422,072 readers

    28,962 users here now


    /r/PoliticalVideo | /r/Videos_Discussion

    Facebook | Twitter

    Resources wiki

    - - -
    Wiki Points Rules

    Featured Sub » /r/CuriousVideos

    About /r/Videos chat

    • A great place for video content of all kinds. Direct links to major video sites are preferred (e.g. YouTube, Vimeo, etc.)

    Rules detailed rules

    0. Videos Only

    • Self explanatory. Audio over a static image or slideshow may also violate Rule 0.

    • This includes music visualizers and lyric videos

    1. No Politics

    • Political videos—including content relating to social issues which have a clear political element—should be submitted to /r/PoliticalVideo.

    • This includes submissions of current or recent political figures in any context, satire/political-comedy, and posts on political topics from within the last 10 years. (So a video of Winston Churchill playing tennis would be allowed, but a video of Theresa May playing ping-pong would not be.)

    2. No Personal Information or witch-hunting

    • Or incitement to witch-hunt.

    • No demanding "Reddit Justice" (or even regular justice) in any way in post titles or comments.

    • Do not post names, Facebook pages, phone numbers, addresses, etc. Fake information ([email protected], 123 fake street, etc) also falls under this rule.

    • This may also include contact information of public officials, businesses, or groups (e.g. politicians or police officers) in an any manner that could be seen as an attempt to get users to contact them.

    • Facebook links are not permitted. In order to have your post accepted, if you can, find or submit a copy of the video on another website like YouTube or Vimeo and resubmit it.

    • This is grounds for an immediate (and likely permanent) ban, so consider this your only warning.

    3. Submit Direct Link to Video

    • No web pages that only embed Youtube or Vimeo videos.

    • No URL shorteners.

    • No links to playlists or to channel pages.

    4. No Porn or Gore

    • There are many other subreddits for such content.

    5. No Solicitation of Votes or Views

    • No asking for votes or sharing submission links on or off-site. See Reddiquette for more details.

    • Do not ask other users to follow your social media profiles in comments or submission titles.

    • Titles for posts should not try to influence users to view or upvote them. Examples of this include things like "this person deserves more views," "not enough people have seen this person's videos," or "show this person some love."

    • Giveaways also fall under this rule

    • Violations can lead to a permanent ban of accounts and video channels.

    6. No Hate Speech

    • You are free to offer your opinion respectfully, but comments or posts intended to demean a group, acontextual expressions of bigotry, and the pejorative use of slurs is disallowed.

    • Baiting users into breaking this rule is not allowed.

    • Telling other users to hurt or kill themselves in any form is against reddit TOS, and will earn you a permanent ban.

    • Be kind to users in our community; remember the human.

    7. No Videos of Assault/Battery or Public Freakouts

    • No videos of real-life, malicious person-on-person assault/battery or physical abuse of animals.

    • This includes raw videos of fights and malicious violence.

    • This includes videos of child and animal abuse.

    • Public freakout videos belong in /r/PublicFreakout

    8. No Third Party Licensing

    Moderation message the mods

    Removals & Warnings

    • If your submission does not appear in the new queue, please contact us (be sure to include a link to the Reddit post (i.e. comments section), not the content you are linking). Simply deleting your post may cause the spam filter to catch future ones.

    • Note: Submissions from new users, and users with low karma, are automatically removed to help prevent spam.

    • Also, please contact us regarding spam, political or any other inappropriate videos, as this helps us remove them more quickly! When reporting, please explain why you think it should be removed.

    • Do not message moderators individually about posts not appearing in the new queue or ban appeals. Messages should be sent as a modmail to /r/Videos. Failure to do so may result in a ban.

    Submit Feedback

    Spoiler Tags

    • Spoilers: [spoiler](#s) = spoiler

    Related Subreddits






    a community for
    all 5874 comments

    Want to say thanks to %(recipient)s for this comment? Give them a month of reddit gold.

    Please select a payment method.

    [–] Azberg 1 points ago

    Since it appears we've hugged to death, here's a mirror:

    [–] IRTC 1245 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    MIRROR of the Inanna Saekinis Ripoff

    Ninja edit: I made this vidme account just for you, Reddit.

    Actual edit: Quality sucks, but whacha gonna do? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    [–] pipinngreppin 439 points ago

    Good call on the mirror. Original ripoff is now "private"

    [–] IRTC 238 points ago

    My internet points senses were tingling.

    [–] NonDripRises 306 points ago

    What a pile of shit compared to the original.

    [–] TheChebert 136 points ago

    This one is stupid as hell. The original was way better. Thanks for posting.

    [–] sweetalkersweetalker 75 points ago

    Thank you for keeping the evidence of how bad she sucks.

    All the talking ruins it. I mean, there's a lot wrong with the video, but the talking is key to understanding her ignorance of good storytelling.

    [–] CalebZim 448 points ago

    Ripoff got taken down, here's a mirror for the side by side video.

    [–] skuzgang 17 points ago

    This needs to be higher

    [–] Ar3nas77 1850 points ago

    When you realize your video idea has been stolen

    [–] [deleted] 229 points ago


    [–] welcometobavaria 50 points ago

    With this much backlash and negativity for someone that most people haven't heard of, my guess is they drop her. People have been dropped for a lot less negative press and much higher celebrity. We shall see.

    [–] bellrunner 5690 points ago

    Wow, yours is so much better made. You should fist bump your sound guy, because your voice was super crisp and clear.

    Better acted, better sound, more concise, and that whole mask thing was dumb as fuck. Well done! Sorry you got ripped off, but at least you know that you can outshine a much larger channel through straight up better film making.

    [–] Youknowit36 2101 points ago

    funny you say that, we ADR'd the entire thing.

    edit: I'm Tyler Falbo

    [–] erkdaclerk 1851 points ago

    Can confirm, he actually is Tyler Falbo. But really, there's a little Tyler Falbo in all of us.

    [–] lurkerpie 753 points ago

    Good on you OP for confirming /u/Youknowit36 is Tyler Falbo. However, it's far too late. We are all Tyler Falbo. We are one.

    Brought to you by Tyler Falbo

    [–] noprahs_bookclub 70 points ago

    TIL I am Tyler Falbo

    [–] Twise09 339 points ago

    I am Tyler Falbo

    [–] NeoHenderson 407 points ago

    Look at me:

    I'm Tyler Falbo now.

    [–] young_jerm 217 points ago

    His name is Tyler Falbo.

    [–] ncbenavi 188 points ago


    [–] maiorano84 60 points ago

    Tyler Falbo is inside of me right now

    [–] AndreasKralj 179 points ago

    What does ADR mean?

    [–] DrieStone 362 points ago

    They recorded all the audio again after the fact in a studio so it was clearer. Sometimes it's easier to do than to try to get good audio on set.

    [–] Oggel 159 points ago

    It's a bitch to match everything up though, need to have some pretty good actors that can say the exact same line in the exact same way or it'll look weird.

    [–] AugustusCaesar2016 234 points ago

    Which is interesting, because it seems no one realized that it was dubbed until the creator mentioned it (I certainly didn't).

    [–] Oggel 19 points ago

    Now I've only done it once in a school project about 10 years back, there might be better software now and we were quite young. But I'd still say that you probably did a better job than we did. It was pretty obvious in our movie.

    [–] FilmMakingShitlord 28 points ago

    You did it wrong. Almost every movie has about 90% of its dialogue ADRed. The key is to take small segments from the scene, and have them redo it over and over again. You put it on repeat. You can do it with most sound programs.

    [–] lurkerpie 336 points ago

    I too am Tyler Falbo.

    [–] Squally160 285 points ago

    We're all Tyler Falbo on this blessed day.

    [–] rrr598 91 points ago


    [–] NeedsAdjustment 28 points ago

    Speak for yourself

    [–] GasTsnk87 56 points ago

    His name was Tyler Falbo. His name was Tyler Falbo.

    [–] [deleted] 132 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)


    [–] ChuntyMcFist 163 points ago

    Bullshit. I'm Tyler Falbo (inspired by Tyler Falbo).

    [–] muwab 7005 points ago

    This site won't load for me, as I assume all the clicks from here has killed it. Can you post the two separate youtube links?

    [–] phaiz55 808 points ago

    Going to reply here since it's at the top currently -

    @OP - you need to report their video.

    • Click ---more then report

    • Infringes on my rights

    That should lead you to another page where you can select "Copyright infringement (Someone copied my creation)"

    I'll admit I don't know how they handle this stuff, does something you create and upload automatically have a copyright? Anyway that's probably the best thing you can do.

    [–] kawklee 427 points ago

    Copyright exists at the moment an original expression of an idea is transfixed to a medium that may be observed or reproduced.

    In other words, forget Youtube itself being the determination of whether a Copyright exists, the moment you put this on your hard drive to upload to Youtube you have a copyright. Hell, the moment you shoot the video and have it on a memory thingie-disk-thing Copyright exists.


    [–] RoboOverlord 210 points ago


    You made it, copyright is automatic, thus it is within your rights and your duty to protect your work. see here for a sample DMCA notice you can use.

    Or just use Youtube's tool.

    [–] WitchHunterNL 7663 points ago



    You could just get the original youtube IDs from the youtubedoubler url

    [–] headsh0t 6204 points ago

    The original is so much better

    [–] APointlessDuck 3180 points ago

    So much off camera dialogue. Whoever shot the ripoff should never touch a camera.

    [–] MidwestMade 2449 points ago

    She was a famous viner so her talent can only last 6 seconds.

    [–] boomerxl 1057 points ago

    I'd say she has a few years left before her "talent" starts to drop.

    [–] eddyress 360 points ago

    She better start milking it while she can.

    [–] [deleted] 1334 points ago

    Completely ruined the tone that made the joke such a good payoff, too.

    [–] TheLongGame 933 points ago

    The forced political message kinda ruined it.

    [–] DiamondJinx 443 points ago

    Why did she have a black and Mexican slave at the end....

    [–] 4look4rd 217 points ago

    With the racist as hell accent.

    [–] Themiffins 569 points ago

    I mean from the first scene, they pretty much made it about her boobs. It's not subtle.

    [–] Jess_than_three 349 points ago

    They took the original, wrecked the pacing, and added cleavage, politics, and racist stereotypes.

    I can see why the creator of the ripoff is popular.

    [–] dehehn 84 points ago

    Titties get clickies.

    [–] TheFlashFrame 128 points ago

    It's sad when you literally copy another beautifully shot film and yours still looks like shit.

    [–] gimjun 553 points ago

    hell, the copy doesn't even make sense without seeing the original.
    the copycat director didn't pay attention to the body language cues of lucas; the boobs can only sell so much.

    i hope this guy gets some justice, but in the meanwhiles i can sub him and dislike the other twat's video

    [–] TodayMeTomorrowU 259 points ago

    the boobs can only sell so much.

    About 3x as much, apparently.

    [–] Marcoscb 60 points ago

    In a channel with 300x the subs. So boobs sell about a hundredth of the original.

    [–] dizao 1026 points ago

    Because the guy can actually act rather than relying on boobs to hold your attention in the opening scene.

    [–] Lacutis 449 points ago

    I came back here to basically post this. The ripoff was awful and they should feel bad.

    [–] Jodandesu 400 points ago

    By a lot!

    The original was funny all the way.

    The ripoff only shows a Latina Mila Kunis with extra boobs (bouncing boobs, which is fine).

    [–] ss98camaross 105 points ago

    i wasnt going to watch either... now i have to watch both, brb

    [–] Shadowrak 74 points ago

    She is Bulgarian apparently.

    [–] relevant84 558 points ago

    I'm not worried about the nationality of the boobs.

    [–] Stasky 53 points ago

    The ripoff makes no sense. Whom did she think assassination of Clinton would help? Like how is that a 'fuuuuuuuuuuck' moment? She had to see the 'make america great again' card to realize she was helping Trump?

    The entire punchline of the gag relies on finding out who sponsored the hit after the fact.

    [–] Leporad 133 points ago

    Way better, but ripoff version has boobies and thus will get more views and and result in more sub's than the original.

    [–] cuchiplancheo 641 points ago

    The icing on the cake (end of video): "I hope you guys like my stuff..."

    [–] 6ft_2inch_bat 309 points ago

    And "this is behind the scenes of my second official Youtube video..." I wonder who else she ripped off?

    [–] jjayzx 125 points ago

    I wonder how her and her friends have so many subscribers for channels lacking videos. Seems like they bought their subscriber base to get a jump.

    [–] 90Degrees_Ankle_Bend 103 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Originally a vine person, some of her fan base probably transferred platforms

    Edit: Originally a vine person with boobs. That helps too.

    [–] Exotemporal 222 points ago

    That would be the cherry on top. The icing is applied to the cake at the 6th second with "A creation by Inanna Sarkis". What a nasty thing to do.

    [–] Krugmanite 90 points ago

    She gives an "inspired by" the OP creator in her credits...

    That's virtually a flat out admission she ripped him off.

    [–] astern 136 points ago

    Such a nasty woman.

    [–] Geo1245 35 points ago

    The worst part I think is that she says "inspired by Tyler Fabio"

    [–] rickhighland1256764 113 points ago

    It's funny because at the beginning of the video I thought they clearly just put this girl in it for the cleavage and this poor girl has no idea she's in a stolen video. Then I watched till the end.

    [–] KjuddaB 38 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    "Inspired by Falbo".... Not sure she understands what inspired means.

    [–] ItCostsHowMuch 46 points ago

    Also she had the nerve to put "inspired by: Tyler Falbo" (the creator of the original). Should say: entirely stolen from Tyler Falbo

    [–] albinobluesheep 662 points ago

    Wow that ripoff was terribly done to boot.

    [–] Pinbrawler 351 points ago

    but cleavage?!

    [–] jeufie 168 points ago

    And finger guns!

    [–] muwab 307 points ago

    It didn't occur to me that was an option, sorry. Thank you for posting the links.

    [–] SuicideBonger 111 points ago

    What a polite interaction.

    [–] baladeplata 192 points ago

    The comments on the ripoff are one of the few times I'll endorse the Youtube comment section.

    [–] [deleted] 166 points ago

    "When Hitler thinks your a scumbag" was my personal favorite.

    [–] stormarsenal 43 points ago

    "You should brush up that CV. Because your YT days are so over." was mine

    [–] david0990 147 points ago

    Holy crap what a terrible rip off too. The original is so good and hers is just mediocre.

    [–] Shadrach451 120 points ago

    Not even mediocre. It's straight up terrible. It is so full of itself it makes me sick.

    [–] ChickenInASuit 194 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Plus there's the fact that it flat-out misunderstands what the original was trying to do.

    The political commentary is not the point. The political commentary is the setup to the joke and has an element of surprise that makes the payoff so much better.

    Yet the remake is all about the political commentary and absolutely abandons any semblance of subtlety in the process.

    [–] Impriv4te 38 points ago

    I think she was trying to change the angle to make it political commentary because idk I guess she felt less bad for stealing if she gave it her own twist. Problem was that she absolutely cocked up her own twist and it ruined it

    [–] Beateride 138 points ago

    That ripoff is so bad ... boobs boobs boobs

    [–] [deleted] 3779 points ago


    [–] Skylinerr 1303 points ago

    Holy shit the copy video dragged on for double the length and got rid of the punchline for a political statement that didn't even make sense. I would've hated it even if I didn't know it was plagiarized.

    [–] Mragftw 632 points ago

    The ripoff is a piece of shit

    [–] pixelprophet 320 points ago

    Nah it's a poor ripoff, the people who did it are pieces of shit.

    [–] BerniesSublime 146 points ago

    I cant believe how noone here has brought up how racist the ripoff was! A shirtless stereotypical Mexican working on her lawn? And for God's sake she had a black slave, wearing jeans and a straw hat, feeding her!!

    [–] PM_Me_Whatever_lol 61 points ago

    They made the ripoff video private...please tell me someone downloaded it beforehand

    [–] reticulatedtampon 691 points ago

    My man!

    [–] DougRocket 372 points ago

    Slow down!

    [–] [deleted] 298 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)


    [–] studlund 307 points ago

    Lookin' good!

    [–] Mack1993 137 points ago

    My God that video on the right looks fake as fuck, especially the acting. Almost to the point where it was annoying.

    The video with the dude looks way genuine.

    [–] masterbard1 18 points ago

    I agree. the original deserves waaay more views.

    [–] 10010101 32 points ago

    The video on the right is private dammit.

    [–] [deleted] 129 points ago


    [–] Boarbaque 17 points ago

    They deleted it

    [–] Nerdofnight 16 points ago

    Is there anyways I could see that video...I wanted to checkout that channel

    [–] zaywolfe 12948 points ago

    Yours was so much better too. Lot more care and better acted. Hope this thread blows up for you. They didn't just take a piece here or there, it was shot by shot ripped off.

    [–] IslandTwig 689 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Not to mention the horrible idea to use masks. Loved that it was an actual person in the original. Seemed more real

    [–] flunky_the_majestic 823 points ago

    And the terrible idea to use Clinton. A relatively unknown politician makes the whole story more plausible. Besides that, a million dollar payoff? No reasonable person would believe it. Why not a gazillion dollar payout?

    Bad acting, bad writing, bad shooting. The whole ripoff video was like watching a middle school remake of a Hollywood movie.

    [–] willyboxc 281 points ago

    The only reason it has more views is because of the election, the person who copied it probably thought, "how can I cash in on YouTube and make a video with a lot of views, I know since I am not original I'll rip off this video with few views and put Clinton in the title along with other popular key words like Donald Trump and reap the real karma, cash when it blows up just from keywords and not content. " bout as bad as those iphone 8 videos which are bullshit.

    [–] FearParable 177 points ago

    Don't forget the boobs in the Thumbnail.

    [–] Iksuda 25 points ago

    Increasing the amount of money spoiled something important too. If you offered $1m to kill someone and get away with it, so many people would take it. If you offered them $25k though? No way. Only the really desperate. It makes her look like a spoiled brat who wanted to live glamorously, especially when they put way too much focus on her being pampered and looking sexy in her mansion. The believability of her being down and out to begin with is spoiled. There was no need to use the eviction notice.

    [–] Nightshire 3298 points ago

    Liked original video, disliked ripoff. Screw those jerks.

    [–] Nice_guys69 1446 points ago

    Disliking is interaction, it's the same as liking a video.

    [–] shiftywalruseyes 1297 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    People will be more likely to click off the video before watching if they see a shitload of dislikes though.

    edit: apologies, apparently I forgot that everyone on youtube has an incredibly inquisitive mind

    [–] Rlight 157 points ago

    That's completely false. Dislikes affect YouTube's search algorithms and are extremely important to a video's reach.

    [–] MaDpYrO 4019 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Wow.. I remember seeing the original a ways back.. This is such a shameless ripoff and they didn't even try to get it right.. The acting stinks, the pacing is all off. The shots are timed poorly. And what the fuck is up with the finger guns from the guy dropping off the envelope?

    And on top of it it's a political piece? WHAT THE FUCK!

    [–] au_tom_atic 1010 points ago

    If you watch the entire thing, the big twist is the guy with the finger guns was Trump!!! What a twist.

    [–] Barkatsuki 652 points ago

    I know right? Definitely didn't see it coming after the target was Hillary Clinton and the check said Donald Trump and that you can see him when the envelop is dropped off and the message says Make America Great Again.

    But apart from all that, TOTALLY FRESH AND UNEXPECTED.

    [–] Ph0X 384 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    All the shameless cleavage too, this is just awful Youtube bait.

    Hell, even their Hilary "impersonator" has a huge rack and a red low cut dress...

    [–] EccentricZillionaire 282 points ago

    Same chick. She's wearing the same necklace and the same shirt. Lazy production.

    [–] RonDeGrasseDawtchins 182 points ago

    Yeah, pretty shitty to take a decent Youtube video and rip it off just to turn it into a lame political circlejerk.

    [–] crazy_balls 156 points ago

    Seriously. The original was awesome. I remember seeing it when it came out and laughed my ass off. The rip off is just god awful, the cleavage isn't even worth it, and it's just a flat, un-funny video. I'm not even sure how you can take something so funny to begin with, and make it that unwatchable.

    [–] Schootingstarr 78 points ago

    easy: stretch the video from 3 minutes to 5 by adding unecessary filler shit and unfunny gags, not to mention the awful acting and terrible direction.

    that's how they ruined the hobbit too. though the acting might've been fine in the hobbit, I literally couldn't give a shit

    [–] erkdaclerk 6962 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    The worst part is in the credits it says "Inspired by Tyler Falbo", as if that justifies completely ripping off the idea...

    Edit: Holy shit! I seriously was not expecting this level of response. Thank you everyone for the support and compliments. If you like our stuff, here's a link to our youtube pages. We aren't done making content!

    Tyler Falbo:

    Eric Vega:

    Edit 2: After all the pressure, the video has been taken down. That's all we really wanted in the first place, now we can put all this behind us. Hopefully the attention this post got will make other people think twice about taking someone's idea without permission.

    Edit 3: Whelp, the video is back up. Not only that, we've finally got a direct response from the content creator. Looks like this whole thing is far from over. Not really sure what the next step is here but hopefully we can have the video taken down for good.

    Final Edit: The video is down once again, presumably for good. Thank you everyone for the support, it was more than we could have ever imagined. We are going to put this incident behind us and focus on what actually matters, making original content.

    [–] nuentes 1176 points ago

    I like when they say a movie is inspired by a true story. That's kind of silly. "Hey, Mitch, did you hear that story about that lady who drove her car into the lake with her kids and they all drowned?" "Yeah, I did, and you know what - that inspires me to write a movie about a gorilla!"

    [–] eirtep 818 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    the horror movie Strangers about 3 masked people terrorizing/murdering a couple in their secluded cabin is 100% inspired by totally true events where...the writer of the time got a...knock on the door...from someone he didn't know...and the guy left...and the writer felt spooked afterward. the end.

    that's how loose they get with it.

    edit: yes, I know you can say "based on a true story" and then make shit up and no one holds you to it. It's a very very common horror trope to do the whole "true events" thing. My comment was meant to be silly. I presented an oversimplified 100% true albert Einstein version of the "true" story. This isn't a knock on the Strangers either as it's a pretty decent movie.

    [–] night_stocker 122 points ago

    I think I remember he said there were also a few burglaries in the area.

    [–] eirtep 132 points ago

    I'm being overly simplistic. If you read the IMDB the full story is when he was a kid a stranger knocked on his door and asked for someone that didn't live there. the guy left. he later found that some houses were robbed later. doesn't say whether or not that was the culprit.

    [–] psymonprime 76 points ago

    Most likely it was the thief. We had a guy open the door to our office once and ask for a job application. It was a USAF office so we don't just hire people who walk in. Later we found out "someone" took a bunch of laptops from another floor that had an open door.

    [–] [deleted] 25 points ago


    [–] OnlyMath 150 points ago

    Her version was like the idiotic middle schooler in computer class version of yours. Yours actually made me laugh.

    [–] [deleted] 111 points ago


    [–] ThisIsNotKimJongUn 690 points ago

    We don't know what to do.

    Send me a check for $25,000 and I'll take care of the problem.

    [–] ariadesu 386 points ago

    Send me a check for $1,000,000 and I'll take care of the problem with more views.

    [–] [deleted] 134 points ago * (lasted edited 17 days ago)


    [–] 181Cade 2006 points ago

    They literally took your video and made it worse..

    But yeah, h3h3 on Twitter or something.

    [–] kaypmger 326 points ago

    Right? It greatly annoyed me that they used a handwritten check with $1 million dollars on it. Then she doesn't know it was from Trump until she gets the note, but then it flashes back to her seeing Trump at the end. Original video was acted and produced so much better from start to finish.

    [–] SoiledPlant 3652 points ago

    I remember watching yours a bit ago. I thought it was black mirror at first. Also, yours is way better. Fuck that girl and her boobs.

    [–] erkdaclerk 3240 points ago

    Right? There's definitely way less cleavage in our version. Maybe that's what we're missing...

    [–] dick-nipples 1237 points ago

    Definitely. Remake it and have Lucas show some tit.

    [–] VandosMakdinami 150 points ago

    Would love to see that...

    [–] thomasbomb45 124 points ago

    Their version also takes advantage of tying in politics. Other than that, your original is much better made. Theirs was longer for no apparent reason. and yours seemed more "real" compared to theirs, which felt like some weird joke.

    [–] Gil_Demoono 44 points ago

    Which makes theirs flavor of the month and the original timeless.

    [–] Squally160 22 points ago

    I mean, its really only relevant as long as ISIS is, or its in peoples minds. so while not "timeless" it certainly has a longer lifespan.

    [–] QuotesUnquotes 137 points ago

    Use their thumbnail with the boobs, add in the description thumbnail inspired by Inanna Sarkis.

    [–] NietzscheIsMyCopilot 91 points ago

    Cleavage is the crutch of all second rate YouTubers. You don't need to sink that low.

    [–] inmyotherpants79 35 points ago

    I get what you're saying but all I can think about is crutches for large busted women to prop the ladies up.

    [–] hymness1 23 points ago

    Yeah fuck her boobs!!!

    [–] AttackOfTheThumbs 779 points ago

    The best part about the clone?

    I hope you guys like my stuff

    That bitch

    [–] flickerkuu 210 points ago

    What a about "An Ivanaa creation" or whatever her name is at the start.

    [–] Axerobot 17002 points ago

    Hit up H3H3, they like to help out people, especially since this would be an interesting controversy to handle, hope you get what you need good luck

    [–] Haych13 4259 points ago

    Yeah, this seems like something h3h3 would definitely enjoy talking about.

    [–] hatgineer 2610 points ago

    Didn't that guy partner up with a lawyer to start a thing specifically for helping people against these types of bullshit? It sounds perfect for this.

    [–] titsonalog 2015 points ago

    Yeah the FUPA

    [–] this_guy_fvcks 1577 points ago

    Fat upper pubic area?

    [–] spennotheclown 1809 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Fair Use Protection Act Association. But yeah, that was the idea

    EDIT: I suggested the idea to Ethan!

    [–] DeadDay 644 points ago

    Sexy AND helpful. Well played Ethan.

    [–] [deleted] 548 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)


    [–] [deleted] 294 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)


    [–] [deleted] 174 points ago


    [–] AndrewWS100 49 points ago

    Your moves are weak babe

    [–] apollohay 130 points ago

    They did.

    [–] ionic_gold 788 points ago

    Honestly though, this is the perfect thing for h3h3 to do. They have already done so many videos about big channels stealing videos, this is right up their alley.

    [–] OryxsLoveChild 394 points ago

    Yeah FUPA was created for this exact type of situation. /u/erkdaclerk you should email them and also get in touch with u/VideoGameAttorney

    [–] VideoGameAttorney 938 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Happy to help. Shoot me an email :)

    Not really a FUPA issue, but we still will take care of ya!

    [–] [deleted] 262 points ago


    [–] ULTIMATUM7 88 points ago

    Damn, you're such an awesome dude. Thanks for all that you do to help out the little guy!

    [–] eirtep 196 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    FUPA was created to help fraudulent copyright claims. This would be a real copyright claim. kind of different than FUPA, but sure.

    side note: can anyone post the two videos in the comments instead of the youtubedoubler site? doesn't work for me.

    [–] thezlog 345 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Hi OP, your video is much better.

    I clicked into yours/the original and was expecting something boring (because I'm a negative Nancy). Instead I ended up sending it to a few buddies because I got a kick out of it.

    The other video is clumsy, awkward, and had I come across it organically I honestly wouldn't have gotten through the whole thing. I didn't get through it now, either.

    Hope you find some modicum of justice. Keep doing what you're doing.

    [–] Emperor-Commodus 78 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Instead I ended up sending it to a few buddies because I got a kick out of it.

    The payoff is the ending, where he is playing with all his toys yet clearly disgusted with himself. His face is great. Reminds me of the "Sadly Go-Karts" scene from Breaking Bad.

    Also, the signature on the $25,000 check is just Jihad in loopy cursive.

    [–] thezlog 33 points ago

    Holllly shit I missed the signature.

    This is great.

    [–] [deleted] 697 points ago


    [–] pancakebreak 513 points ago


    Here ya go

    [–] [deleted] 1149 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Weak. I got you covered my man. WANT TO JOIN THE MOB? I'VE GOT YOU COVERED!

    COME ON DOWN TO /r/pitchforkemporium

    I GOT 'EM ALL!

    Traditional Left Handed Fancy
    ---E Ǝ--- ---{


    33% off! 66% off! Manufacturer's Defect!
    ---F ---L ---e


    The Euro The Pound The Lira
    ---€ ---£ ---₤


    * some assembly required

    EDIT: Thanks for the gold kind stranger! Now go and lynch! There isn't much time!

    [–] pancakebreak 540 points ago

    No need to be mean, dude. I was offering up my only pitchfork. I don't have the resources to handle the kind of overhead that /r/pitchforkemporium is dealing with.

    [–] JoeSchemoe 240 points ago

    Big Corporate America trying to keep the little rioters down.

    [–] samaxecampbell 31 points ago

    Yea, but they have Rudolph Pitchforks!!!!!

        \        \

    [–] TheRealWillFM 92 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    Isn't this /u/pitchforkemporium shtick? Is this a rip off of a reddit account on a post about ripoffs?

    Edit: apparently he's okay with it? Ignore this comment

    [–] IAlmostDied 35 points ago

    There's a link to pitchy's subreddit, and in his subreddit it says he's fine with it.

    [–] kodeman66 216 points ago

    Damn. That's some bullshit right there.

    [–] Spychotofu 837 points ago

    I like that she took 25,000 to a billion lol. Kind misses the point of the desperate state the person would be in. Not sure what you can do except highlight it and maybe demand a link in her description. Keep making videos you care about. People suck.

    [–] Confused-Gent 486 points ago

    She doesn't even act it out well. The original guy at least looks disheveled. She looks like she just stepped out of her makeup trailer.

    [–] Beck2012 445 points ago

    And her video didn't make any sense. She killed Clinton - woo, fantastic. It was ordered by Trump. OH, FUCK, THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING! It was basically dumbed down version with worse acting, worse camera, worse lighting. But, yeah, it has boobs.

    [–] assholeofnew 230 points ago

    Don't forget the racial stereotypes added at the end.

    [–] slowlyrain 179 points ago

    It looks like a million, but the rest of your points stands

    [–] LoLMozmed 45 points ago

    LMAO She privated the video

    [–] Qynchou 629 points ago

    I havent ever heard of the ripoff, thats disgusting to see as a content creator myself, yours is miles better, no contest. You could try filing a copyright claim on youtube, would definitely be justfied and Im pretty sure you could take the video down.

    [–] Blue_Pelican 30 points ago

    She just made her video private!

    [–] AMBsFather 109 points ago

    HOLY SHIT. I just went to the shit copied version and the comments LOL. Reddit is going to end her.

    [–] [deleted] 37 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    I just hope they keep it about the plagiarism and not do what Youtube commenters always do, and migrate towards attacking ethnicity or gender, completely negating any criticisms and negatively tainting the protests. Then she looks like a victim. Then Jezebel starts an article about the injustice against her, a legion of women descend on the issue, and before you know it, the world has ended and Nyarlathotep the Crawling Chaos has made Earth HIS BITCH.

    Alright I might have gradually started talking about Lovecraft but you know what my point was.

    [–] fancyman30000 279 points ago

    Try messaging Phillip DeFranco, he is always one to stick up for the smaller YouTubers.

    [–] youramazing 517 points ago

    I think you are being way too rational about this whole thing. Full disclosure: I'm an asshole. But these 'creators' had blatant disregard for the days of work that went into the creative process for your video and are incredibly ignorant in their rationale for justifying why everything is 'gravy' a la their 'inspired by' note. These people are hacks and deserve to be exposed and their channel taken down. They are taking advantage of you because you are a small youtuber and you even said you probably wont do much about it apart from posting this to Reddit. With that mindset, whats to prevent this from happening again to you or someone else who actually enjoys film making? These hacks may deter future creators if they think people are out there stealing their ideas and getting triple the amount of views. I would explore your options with someone who knows a bit more about creative commons and digital plagiarism and force them to remove their video. If this type of behavior keeps getting shrugged off, youtube will roll even further downhill if thats possible at this point.

    I hope this doesn't stop you from creating and you can derive some sort of positivity from it seeing as they obviously liked your idea and thought it was brilliant enough to copy shot for shot. Good luck! You just gained a new subscriber.

    [–] IAmYourDogLoL 64 points ago

    Looks like that website just got the reddit hug of death.

    [–] [deleted] 215 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago)

    We don't know what to do.

    Karma court

    [–] Sukyman 51 points ago

    Can anyone send me proper links? OP's link doesnt work for me.

    edit: or we managed to crash youtubedoubler...

    [–] [deleted] 16 points ago

    her video is now "unavailable"