Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    Atheist101

    + friends - friends
    14,095 link karma
    586,593 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] Girlfriend disappointed in proposal Atheist101 1 points ago in askwomenadvice

    Do you want to start an explosive argument? Because thats how you start an explosive argument...

    [–] u/spacehogg shows (in 7 simple graphics) why you cannot trust Republicans with money ever Atheist101 1 points ago in bestof

    Im not saying hes dumb, Im saying hes a troll posting in bad faith in order to stir up drama. If you want an example of why you should only call out and shame /r/the_donald posters, see this: https://np.reddit.com/r/Colorado/comments/9vu6rm/democrats_declare_victory_in_race_that_would_seat/e9gnydd/?sh=83705e9f&st=JOD59QKK

    He took time to explain why the /r/the_donald troll was wrong and used proof and decent language. You know the first thing the /r/the_donald troll did? He made fun of that user for taking time to post a word wall and then he insulted that user.

    You dont feed the trolls, you just point them out so that others can avoid them too. Its called noticing a pattern.

    [–] /u/bomphcheese explains confirmation bias to someone from the donald Atheist101 7 points ago in bestof

    Thats called concern trolling and they've been doing it for over a year

    [–] /u/bomphcheese explains confirmation bias to someone from the donald Atheist101 0 points ago in bestof

    The best thing you can honestly do is tag the user, call them out whenever they post as a /r/the_donald troll as a warning to other users to not engage and then move on.

    [–] u/spacehogg shows (in 7 simple graphics) why you cannot trust Republicans with money ever Atheist101 -22 points ago in bestof

    No, it's not that. They pretend to be normal posters but "concerned" about something when they post to reel someone in. This is called concern trolling and it's meant to disguise their bad intentions. When they have reeled the unsuspecting fellow, they drop the facade but by that point, it's too late for our unsuspecting user.

    [–] Is Anyone Surprised Trump Doesn’t Know the Difference Between Baltic States and the Balkans? Atheist101 2 points ago in politics

    Just an fyi to everyone:

    Balkans are named after the Balkan Mountains.

    Baltics are named after the Baltic Sea.

    [–] u/spacehogg shows (in 7 simple graphics) why you cannot trust Republicans with money ever Atheist101 -33 points ago * (lasted edited 10 hours ago) in bestof

    The majority of your posts are in /r/the_donald, therefore, you arent posting in good faith for a discussion but rather to troll.

    Be gone!

    edit: the downvotes prove my point. Thanks for playing. This post is another example of why you should never engage a /r/the_donald troll: https://np.reddit.com/r/Colorado/comments/9vu6rm/democrats_declare_victory_in_race_that_would_seat/e9gnydd/?sh=83705e9f&st=JOD59QKK

    Name and shame is the only way to survive their game

    [–] NHL Graphical Standings – Nov 11, 2018 Atheist101 1 points ago in hockey

    So Chicago fired Q when they were doing well? Hmmm

    [–] Twins--what's your weirdest experience with the "twin thing"? Atheist101 18 points ago in AskReddit

    I wonder if this has anything with DNA, since twins do share the same DNA. Maybe theres something hardcoded into everyone when it comes to dreams and those who share DNA can share dreams?

    [–] I made a chart about open bars Atheist101 2 points ago in drunk

    My open bar events are always fancy so I have a suit and tie on. First off is the jacket, then the tie, then the top button of the shirt, then the shoes, socks and then the shirt. Bonus points if you put your tie on your forehead while dancing.

    [–] Okay boss, I named the towns Atheist101 5 points ago in NotMyJob

    Newbury . . . Newburyport

    This was my favorite thing to learn when I visited Massachusetts. Also NBP has killer lobster rolls

    [–] Woman sues ex-boyfriend because 'his giant penis stretched her vagina' Atheist101 1 points ago in law

    She said no man can literally fill the gap her ex left.

    Man this journalist sure knows what hes doing lol

    [–] Not enough fish: woman successfully sues dating agency over lack of men Atheist101 1 points ago in law

    In this case though, the site just said "substantial". With all of her crazy requirements factored in, that narrowed the men on the site down to 100.

    Its not the sites fault that her requirements whittled down the dating pool to 100 men. And even 100 men is quite high. Did she actually go on dates with all 100? Or did she right off the bat reject all of them?

    [–] Not enough fish: woman successfully sues dating agency over lack of men Atheist101 1 points ago in law

    They said there are "substantial" amounts of men on the site. There were 100 that fit the woman's requirements. Is that substantial for having such mind-bogglingly high requirements (and borderline crazy)? Id say so but this court disagreed for some reason.