Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    FlipKickBack

    + friends - friends
    470 link karma
    24,924 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] Were you ever that 1 in 1,000,000? If so, what's your story? FlipKickBack 11 points ago in AskReddit

    “Wrong”?? Fuck, how? They have any idea?

    You sleep on your stomach?

    [–] We are now less than 45 days from April Fool's Day. What 'long con' pranks should be started around now? FlipKickBack 2 points ago in AskReddit

    not sure where all that came from just from my post...but i'm basically saying that if you want a certain reaction, try to plan for it accordingly. if you don't give a shit, then ignore my warning.

    [–] We are now less than 45 days from April Fool's Day. What 'long con' pranks should be started around now? FlipKickBack 2 points ago in AskReddit

    yes correct. they executed it poorly and everyone was just confused, probably thinking it's a joke, others weren't sure. the person who announced later felt a lack of positive reaction, etc.

    again, everyone's different and so is their execution, but i saw a train wreck. it also doesn't help that they barely knew the woman..

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack 1 points ago in pics

    The person made a comment about having to purchase a pair of pants before she was allowed to enter to which someone replied that their are full nude bodies painted on the ceiling and that makes no sense,

    that same person said it was for MODESTY purposes (which, i'm sure there's more than 1 reason).

    look i have no idea wtf you're actually arguing. some dipshit replied to that OP saying #religion, and the other wondering how nude bodies in the ceiling can be okay, but shorts aren't.

    i'll fucking explain again....nude bodies on the ceiling is NOT in the same league as wearing shorts. mind boggling for you i'm sure. It's art. It's ancient. Nude bodies in a fucking mural painting does NOT "declass" the "joint". you can easily ban shorts while looking at centuries old art AND religious on top of it. it's called respect, and modesty.

    this is what that peasant didn't understand, and this is what you don't understand.

    your comment was irrelevant and dumb:

    Ok, so how is wearing a pair of shorts sexualized at all?

    i literally never said this. ever. i've repeated a million times why shorts don't work, i never said they were sexual. there is nothing you can say to back your way out of that corner. Period. You replied to me with nonsense saying i was trying to imply shorts aren't banned? i literally fucking said "Yiur shorts dont fit their dress code, it is as simple as that. " yet i implied they were sexualized? Holy F my dude. seriously. wow.

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack 1 points ago in pics

    You can argue whatever philisophical standpoint you want, thst isnt the point and you know it.

    None of the poses have any secual understones to them. No ones having sex, etc

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack 0 points ago in pics

    I wrote this elsewhere, it is clear reading comprehension is down the toilet . Of course you added your own stupidity to it by saying men get away with more, as if thst is what is being discussed here at all. Frustrating as fuck

    Are you..are you being serious? How the fuck did i say shorts is sexualized?? Thst sentence was clearly talking about the art.

    Your shorts dont fit their dress code, it is as simple as that. It is a matter of resoect and put-togetherness, unlike what all these morons are on here saying talking shit about religion. I swear reddit is full of people who simply cant think for themselves. They peruse a comment, upvote and quickly move on.

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack 1 points ago in pics

    Are you..are you being serious? How the fuck did i say shorts is sexualized?? Thst sentence was clearly talking about the art.

    Yiur shorts dont fit their dress code, it is as simple as that. It is a matter of resoect and put-togetherness, unlike what all these morons are on here saying talking shit about religion. I swear reddit is full of people who simply cant think for themselves. They peruse a comment, upvote and quickly move on.

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack -4 points ago in pics

    it's about respect...those nude bodies on the ceiling is Art and isn't sexualized in any way. why do you have to respond like such a dipshit acting as if you know? it's called a fucking dress code.

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack -1 points ago in pics

    it's about respect...those nude bodies on the ceiling is Art and isn't sexualized in any way. why do you have to respond like such a dipshit acting as if you know? it's called a fucking dress code.

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack 2 points ago in pics

    it's about respect...those nude bodies on the ceiling is Art and isn't sexualized in any way. it's called a dress code....

    [–] Going to hell for sneaking an illegal picture of the Sistine Chapel FlipKickBack -3 points ago in pics

    it's about respect...those nude bodies on the ceiling is Art and isn't sexualized in any way. why do you have to respond like such a dipshit acting as if you know? it's called a fucking dress code.

    [–] What’s the dumbest thing your significant other has said or done? FlipKickBack 1 points ago in AskReddit

    i wasn't saying it wasn't....why did you just say that??

    again, you're acting like i'm saying you should forget it ever happened....