Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    Storm_Worm5364

    + friends - friends
    15,405 link karma
    23,108 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] This Week At Bungie 3/15/2018 Storm_Worm5364 3 points ago in DestinyTheGame

    That's not how the word "literally" works.

    Essentially nothing.

    or

    Virtually nothing.

    FTFY

    [–] Console Exclusives Storm_Worm5364 -2 points ago in pcmasterrace

    It's more than 2 or 3 games. But it depends on your income. If someone has enough money to spend on something like a GTX 1080, getting a PS4 isn't a problem.

    I would say that, if you have the money to spend on getting a PS4, that you should. The exclusives are pretty good, usually. I hate having to fork over however much I have to, but I grew up with Playstation and moved to the PC platform back in 2011/2012. Not to mention that I absolutely loved The Last of Us and Uncharted. I had to get the PS4 just to get The Last of Us Part 2 and Uncharted 4. I think those games are well worth it. But obviously, I like to play everything the (triple A) industry has to offer, so games like Destiny or Red Dead Redemption usually get my money as well (AKA console exclusives).

    [–] Bioware boss quits, just months after ME:A release Storm_Worm5364 46 points ago in pcgaming

    Stop mixing shit that doesn't belong.

    Mass Effect Andromeda wasn't made by BioWare Edmonton. It was made by BioWare Montreal, a completely different team.

    He worked for Edmonton.

    It's almost like saying that Bethesda sucks because they did Wolfenstein (an amazing shooter with captivating characters and story) but somehow completely dropped the ball with Fallout 4, when in reality there's "Bethesda" the publisher, and "Bethesda" the dev team.

    [–] Star Wars Battlefront 3 will use Battlelog Storm_Worm5364 26 points ago in pcgaming

    Of course it will. And battlelog is not that bad, people have to stop beating the dead horse.

    It saves people a shit-ton of time in opening a game, seeing all the splash screens, logging in, etc etc etc...

    [–] Black Ops 3 beta running at 900p on Xbox One, 1080p on PS4 Storm_Worm5364 -1 points ago in blackops3

    I don't know how biased this subreddit is, but am I the only one who thinks that people who fight over how good their PS4 is because it runs at 1080p instead of 900p is fucking ridiculous?

    I will probably get a lot of shit for this, but I like to make this analogy:

    *SAVAGE ALERT*

    There's two waitresses. One named Microsoft and the another named Sony. You (PS4 owner) and Bob (Xbox One owner) both get your orders from Sony (You) and Microsoft (Bob). Then when the dishes are ready, Bob gets a shit on his plate and you get a shit with some salsa leaves on top of it. You then proceed to make fun of Bob because you got a slightly better "dish" (if you can call it that).

    So the point is, you didn't get a better product because the PS4 gets 10-15fps more than the Xbone does. It almost exactly the same experience. It's not like you won't taste the shit. But while Bob only tastes the shit, you got some salsa leaves on top of it, which gives it a slight scent.

    EDIT: BTW, I have no bias towards a platform. I own and play on the consoles all the time. But I prefer PC myself because it has a lot more options than all the console combined. Than that's the primary reason why I use my PC more than I use my consoles.

    [–] Fallout 4 beta patch coming to Steam next week, consoles later Storm_Worm5364 -3 points ago * (lasted edited 3 years ago) in fo4

    Damn, look at the karma... The bias is strong on this subreddit.

    [–] CDPR visual artist talks about Witcher 3 downgrade and completely makes no sense Storm_Worm5364 -1 points ago in pcgaming

    What he is saying makes total sense. Not the "it's not downgrading part". But he is still correct. You shouldn't compare a trailer with demo gameplays. Or screenshots, or whatever.

    They had to optimize it too make it run properly. Maybe 1% of PC gaers would be able to run that game if it looked like that. There were people who were invited to play the game that said that they had around 50-60 fps on a machine with 1 or 2 Titan Xs (if I'm not mistaken) and everything turned to the max, without the NVIDIA Hairworks.

    [–] Found on Battlelog Storm_Worm5364 1 points ago in battlefield_4

    BAN THAT MOTHERFUCKER!

    [–] Fallout 4 beta patch coming to Steam next week, consoles later Storm_Worm5364 -1 points ago * (lasted edited 3 years ago) in fo4

    There's a difference between "I enjoy/love the game/frnachise" to "NOTHING IS BETTER THAN IT!".

    I'm probably gonna get a lot of hate for this, but here we go:

    IE33 simply said that Fallout 4 would be on second place, which I find to be a extremely valid point. Witcher 3 is something completely different from Witcher 2. And completely different from any other game, really. Fallout itself is different too, but it's a Fallout game. FO4 is pretty much New Vegas on steroids. The story isn't that great (mediocre) and the Side-quests are still the same "go fetch/kill something for me". Witcher 3's side quests have personality. They have character, lore, etc behind them. I found myself not wanting to skip their lines and I was genuinely "disturbed" when something happened to an NPC (AKA a peasant) in a side-quest (then again Witcher 3's side quests are the best side-quests I've seen in any video-game). That's something that I have never done in any other video-game. I tried doing that with Fallout 4, but after 50h or 60h into the game (yep, I've played too much of it already...) I seemly can't take it anymore. I even find myself wanting to skip main quests' lines sometimes (I haven't finish the main quests yet. I'm a very "do every side mission before doing the main quests" kinda player). Fallout 4 is definitely a great game. But I don't think that it would win against The Witcher 3.

    [–] [Spoiler] Rare Gameplay Footage of this Week's Nightfall-Exclusive Loot Storm_Worm5364 -1 points ago * (lasted edited 8 months ago) in DestinyTheGame

    Although I think it's a funny video, I can't get behind its message, because it seems to imply that everything other than weapons is a shit reward.

    I think getting unique Ghost Shells, Sparrows, etc. is a good thing— but the problem I have is with the Nightfall-loot is that it's completely barebones.

    We got 3 weapons, a new sparrow, a reskin of that new sparrow, a reskinned Ghost shell, and a reskinned ship.

    Ghost Shells, Sparrows, and Ships are a good thing to have. But there has to be more meaningful loot in between.

    [–] Destiny 2: 4K PC 60 FPS Gameplay - Inverted Spire Strike Mission Storm_Worm5364 1 points ago in pcgaming

    Less juvenile, sure. But it's humor is pretty bad compared to Borderlands 2. Especially in Destiny 2, where our Ghost doesn't shut his robot mouth.

    [–] Star Wars Battlefront 3 will use Battlelog Storm_Worm5364 -4 points ago in pcgaming

    I use Battlelog on Chrome since BF3 came out and it has ALWAYS worked for me...

    [–] What happened to The Division? Storm_Worm5364 2 points ago in thedivision

    Negativity? If I'm actually right, we should be speaking volumes... People can protect Ubisoft's shady business practices (we all know they have shady business practices) all they want, but in the end it will only hurt us, the consumer.

    Protecting this type of behavior will only make so that they continue to do this.

    [–] Star Citizen, I am disappointed - Eurogamer Storm_Worm5364 0 points ago in pcgaming

    The issues they are dealing with now are self inflicted from promising more than they knew they could deliver.

    Not really. Star Citizen's initial scope isn't even close to being 176 Million dollars worth.

    promising more than they knew they could deliver

    What? The initial team was like 10 people or less, they didn't know what they could or couldn't do. They didn't even have an engine back then. They had nothing.

    They knew less about what they could deliver back when the initial pitch was announced then what they do today... The technology is all there, right now. All they have to do is expand the Universe, as well as touch-up a lot of the tech.

    SQ42 is almost ready for release, and they are touching-up the game as we speak (they've said it so themselves). IIRC, it's 90+% complete.

    As for the Persistent Universe, they still have a lot of systems to complete, AFAIK. So that's probably where a lot of the work still has to be put forward.

    [–] How many PC guys will play console at release, then change over ? Storm_Worm5364 3 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago) in DestinyTheGame

    I knew it was more than 4 weeks, but I wasn't 100% sure how long it was, so I just said what came to mind first, which was "around 4 weeks".

    But even so. 6 weeks is doable (but I would say unacceptable for a game like Destiny since things like Raids are best experienced blindly). Good thing there will be other games we could enjoy while we wait for Destiny 2 PC.

    I, for one, am really looking forward to play Death of the Outsider (Dishonored II Standalone DLC), Cuphead and Shadow of War. It's a shame Wolfenstein II comes out three days after Destiny 2. Because I love Wolfenstein and I wanna experience both games fully...

    [–] Who said Fallout 4 had to be ugly? Storm_Worm5364 -1 points ago in pcmasterrace

    Excluding the horrible, horrible performance and overall PC port, it just lacks depth in pretty much every department. The gameplay isn't great (although the gunplay is pretty good, specially compared to FO3). The world could be better (it isn't bad, but it isn't really that good), nearly every mission is a copy-paste of other missions. There's little memorable main missions. The only mission I really remember is the one you raid a Vault and save Valentine. Oh, another one. The one where you walk around Kellogg's mind.

    Most missions are generic, there are some decent missions, but a lot of them are just meh, really. The crafting system is fine, but I think it lacks depth as an RPG. The settlement building system are decent-to-bad in my opinion. There's not a lot of options, it is built for a controller (like the rest of the game), it doesn't adjust to the world/ground, which makes it really hard to make a believable settlement and more.

    The side missions are just bad. The only side mission I kinda liked was the one where you dress as The Silver Shroud. Going back to the world, I think it lacks depth as well. It could be a lot more detailed. Enemies are good, but I won't give a point to the game for that because they're well established enemies that are here since the very beginning of the franchise. The factions are all pretty shitty except for The Railroad and The Institute. The Minute-Man are boring and the only thing they do (AKA you do for them) is save settlements. The Brotherhood of Steel is the exact opposite of it. They tell you to go to those settlements are order the settlers to give the BoS resources willingly, or they will forcefully take it from them... The Railroad had decent, varied missions which tied into their lore, so that's why I pretty much only like them (and the Institute because it is a secret thing and I think it is a cool faction with nice lore behind it.

    As for the story. I don't think it is that good. Again, I think it is just decent. I saw the plot a mile away, but I've talked with some friends who've also played the game and they said they didn't see it coming, so I guess it was just me. But I liked the reason as to why The Institute wanted Shaun.

    So that's "all" I can remember. All of that on top of the continuous "fuck you" from Bethesda to PC players just pushed me over the edge. It is literally on the top 3 worst PC support I've experienced from a triple A title in my entire life.

    [–] Dean Hall, creator of DayZ talks on greed and early access game pricing. Storm_Worm5364 -3 points ago * (lasted edited a year ago) in pcmasterrace

    "He", "he", "he".

    Understand one simple thing. He isn't Bohemia and he wasn't the one that called the shots there. He didn't release anything, Bohemia did. He didn't jack the price, Bohemia did.

    3.5 years later it's still in Alpha

    Wrong, it's in Beta.

    Yes, the game's still shitty. Yes, the development has been really slow. But it isn't Dean's fault. Literally everything you talked about was Bohemia's fault.

    You shouldn't talk about game development when you clearly have no clue about how anything relating to it works...

    [–] Reminder of things not listed in Roadmap that need to be changed in near future. Storm_Worm5364 1 points ago * (lasted edited 8 months ago) in DestinyTheGame

    That's still not good enough.

    The Uriel's Gift is a Precision Frame AR. It takes 9 headshots to kill a single Guardian with that weapon (or 12 bodyshots)*.

    That is absolutely ridiculous and I doubt any kind of movement or power ammo changes are gonna change that particular problem. That's why 1v2's are stupidly hard and 1v3's virtually impossible to survive. Because you need AT THE VERY LEAST 18 bullets with the Uriel's Gift in order to win a 1v2, and the longer it takes to kill someone, the longer the enemy and his teammate have to react to your shots and the less aim matters as a skill.

    If it only took, let's say, 3 headshots—the easier it would be to flank and kill an entire team because there would be a high enough chance of them not having enough time to react to your flank.

    I'm certainly not advocating for 3 headshot kills, because I don't think that fits Destiny. But 6 headshot kills (like Destiny 1 had) was perfect for the franchise.

    The TTK as a whole has to go up. I don't understand why they changed the TTK of an already high TTK game (AKA Destiny 1) to something as atrocious as Destiny 2's TTK.


    Resilience Player's HP
    0 186
    1 188
    2 190
    3 192
    4 194
    5 196
    6 197
    7 198
    8 199
    9 200
    10 201
    • 'Uriel's Gift' Precision Damage = 23 Crit Damage. 23 times 9 = 207 (times 8 would be 184, AKA not enough damage to kill a Guardian).