Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    TheAsgards

    + friends - friends
    295 link karma
    8,894 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] Melania wears 'I don't really care do u?' coat on migrant visit TheAsgards 1 points ago in news

    Yep, his argument is that the media and social media companies act as a propganda machine against him and getting outrage over a jacket is only going to help him make his case. Feels very much like a trap.

    [–] Melania wears 'I don't really care do u?' coat on migrant visit TheAsgards 5 points ago in news

    That makes sense. I felt like they knew the media was going to generate outrage at separating kids from parents that were detained and in response they would simply lock the children up with the parents and be like "okay, if that's what you want". The intention isn't to change the hearts and minds of people who's minds are already made up against him. The intention is to solidify his base and to make swing voters in the midwest think the media just complains about everything he does when they complain about him undoing the thing they were complaining about him doing.

    [–] At a family’s amusement park. Just wow. TheAsgards 2 points ago in assholedesign

    They should add a 3rd option to insert $9 for 3 coins.

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards 0 points ago in florida

    So let's get everyone to stop and turn their flashers on. Gotta follow the letter of the law.

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards 2 points ago in florida

    Right. So they can l just pull over, come to a complete stop, and then turn on their flashers which is perfectly legal. Then you'd have nothing to complain a out since youre so concerned about following the letter of the law.

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards 0 points ago * (lasted edited 5 days ago) in florida

    You can pull over and use them. Fact.

    You're just doubling down on this notion that flashers kill

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards 0 points ago in florida

    If these people do t feel safe driving due to low visibility then your rule of law says they can pull over and turn on flashers and wait for visibility to improve. Perfectly legal.

    [–] 20 injured in New Jersey art festival shooting TheAsgards 1 points ago in news

    Two people involved so it must be due to gangs and not because of at least one shitty person.

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards -10 points ago in florida

    So you firmly believe it's safer to have a bunch of people pull over and put their flashers on?

    How about when Shoulders are narrow?

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards -11 points ago in florida

    I can easily tell if a car is in motion or if it's stationary. I'd rather people keep moving if flashers enables them rather than have them pull over.

    If people obey the law and pull over then would t that be even more confusing for the ambulance driver?

    I just see a bunch of people that want to complain about drivers.

    [–] How to waste $5M on containerized infrastructure TheAsgards 0 points ago in kubernetes

    So?

    Edit: Oh you mean heads up as in the link may not work in Europe?

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards -9 points ago in florida

    Such a Florida thing to want the government to punish people for using flashers when going slow in low visibility situations.

    [–] It would be great if people could actually do what this sign says TheAsgards 0 points ago in florida

    I don't understand this at all. Flashers will make cars more visible in hard hard rains where visibility is shit and if someone is going 20 mph below the speed limit then it would help.

    Are you saying you lose the ability to judge speed and distance if you can see them or is it the yellow that throws you off?

    [–] Tom Cotton sold out net neutrality for $70,025. Boozemen for $56,465. Its time for new representation. TheAsgards 1 points ago in Arkansas

    Facebook just banned Imams for Peace. There was a Muslim guy on joe rogans pod cast that said YouTube demonetized him for hate speech yet he's done nothing but advocate moderate Islam and mock strict religious cultures.

    Shits getting absurd.

    Obama appointed Ajit Pai first, btw.

    [–] Tom Cotton sold out net neutrality for $70,025. Boozemen for $56,465. Its time for new representation. TheAsgards 1 points ago * (lasted edited 5 days ago) in Arkansas

    Facebook, Google, and Twitter block people based on political dissent. They're bigger than most ISPs and have a huge ability to shape propaganda.

    How's that make you feel?

    They're even banning Muslims that want leave when they "mock" Hamas. No coincidence that to iu can find tons of support on these platforms for Hamas even, and thus is comedy gold, "queers for Hamas".

    I have a feeling trump will bring NN back but utll include large social media platforms so that they arent censoring crap in the name of making certain people feel safe from ideas they dont like.

    [–] I am raising my daughter to speak three languages. A stranger demanded I 'speak English' to her. TheAsgards 0 points ago in California

    I've been red pilled into being anti modern day liberalism but holy crap your story is hilarious. It amazes me how much people want to dictate what others do or how easily offended we are. I can assure you that most middle and upper class Trump supporters support you 100%.

    Shake off the haters.

    [–] Tom Cotton sold out net neutrality for $70,025. Boozemen for $56,465. Its time for new representation. TheAsgards 1 points ago in Arkansas

    No and if you truly believe unfettered access to information is a right then you'd be fighting to make internet free for everyone, including mobile internet since you include them in this.

    Also you'd be against letting Google or Twitter censor discourse since they are larger than most ISPs and have just as much of an influende on what people see.

    All you really bring to the table is doom n gloom and a culture of victimization. You offer no real solutions to anything and only selectively get outraged a out things according to how they fit into political fear mongering.

    [–] Tom Cotton sold out net neutrality for $70,025. Boozemen for $56,465. Its time for new representation. TheAsgards 1 points ago * (lasted edited 6 days ago) in Arkansas

    The true arbitors of info right now are the Google's and the Twitters of the world and rabid pro NN folks give zero fucks about these companies sharing and even flat out restricting content.

    Honestly if Google ISP said it was going to block access to conservative ideas and said it was to create a safe place for everyone then progressives wouldn't even bat an eye.