Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    orcscorper

    + friends - friends
    1 link karma
    40,188 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] Hungary to ban gender studies degrees orcscorper 1 points ago in worldnews

    Bullshit. He almost certainly sexually harassed Anita Hill, but sexual harassment isn't rape. I'm sure you like to call a lot of things rape that aren't rape at all.

    [–] Hungary to ban gender studies degrees orcscorper 0 points ago in worldnews

    Marxism is a philosophy. Philosophy is kind of like science, but not science. Philosophy was a stand-in for science before the scientific method was developed.

    [–] Soley referring to financially successful women as strong undermines equality. It suggests that only a handful of women are strong, and the only way to be a "strong woman" is through financial success. orcscorper 1 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    That sort of success doesn't attract a high-value mate.

    Who cares about this as an adult?

    I don't know, literally anybody who has a reasonable chance of attracting more than one partner in their lifetime, and can be just a tiny bit choosy?

    Unless you recognize that you are bottom-of-the-barrel and should take whatever you can get, you want a high-value mate. Not to show off, but because of all the shit you have to deal with, with a kow-value mate.

    [–] Soley referring to financially successful women as strong undermines equality. It suggests that only a handful of women are strong, and the only way to be a "strong woman" is through financial success. orcscorper 1 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    A woman can be successful under the same metric, but it doesn't mean anything. That sort of success doesn't attract a high-value mate. It doesn't make all your friends jealous. It doesn't make you more likely to produce successful offspring.

    It's not without value today, but what about the future? If you forego children for your career, you may be fulfilled, but you make no more difference to the future than an incel neckbeard troglodyte.

    Since women choose mates largely on their ability to protect and provide for their children, financial success for men usually leads to reproductive success.

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 0 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    I didn't need those links; they were links to comments in this very thread, that I had already seen.

    So you date the top 20% of the top 20% of men, and you think that all men who are insecure about your giving sex to random dudes, but not them, have never hooked up or had casual sex.

    You date men who have so much casual sex that they are bored of it. Bully for you. You completely fail to understand the reality of modern dating for men who aren't rock stars. There's a word to describe this phenomenon. What was it? Ooh, it's on the tip of my tongue. Oh, yeah! Solipsism!

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 2 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    You are confused. Lewis Cross said "The friendzoned man is getting nothing of value. NOTHING." I didn't say what you attributed to me, and you misquoted the guy who said it.

    Also, "nothing of value" and "(not) anything he wants" are close enough to be a distinction without a difference. Even if I had said both of those things, there would be no contradiction.

    In the future, you may wish to prioritize "learning something" over "scoring meaningless internet points".

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 2 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    The solipsism is strong in this one.

    Guys like a lot of sex. When you say "guys who are used to having sex", I read it as "guys who have enough sex". There is no "enough sex" for the vast majority of men. Even the majority of the top 20% that all women chase don't get so much sex that they actually turn moderately attractive women down for sex. I said it before, and I'll say it again: you live in a different world.

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 1 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    Exactly! You know nothing is ever going to happen, but he doesn't. If you tell him nothing will ever happen, then you are awesome. A real-life unicorn.

    If you can tell that a man you don't want is attracted to you, but string him along because he buys you stuff and generally makes himself useful, you are a terrible person.

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 4 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    Why doesn't the guy leave? Why doesn't the guy just stop hanging out with a woman he loves (or at least lusts after), because he isn't getting everything he wants? Because it's so much better not seeing her, smelling her, making her laugh, maybe getting the occasional hug?

    This is why the Red Pill hammers on oneitis and abundance mentality. A guy who thinks he has no other options will obsess on what he sees as his best chance at love.

    Women who aren't hideously deformed have no idea what it's like to be an average, or below-average, man. You may hate getting hit on by losers all the time, and hate getting catcalled. Now picture this: I could write down from memory every single time a woman paid me a compliment, hit on me, made a move or flirted with me. How many women can even remember every time they were hit in by some hopeless schmuck in the last week? We live in different worlds.

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 5 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    Duh! Friendzoned men are trash, and deserve to be mocked. Also, men who fuckzone women are trash, and deserve to be attacked. In short, men are trash.

    Women who friendzone men deserve understanding, because they are terrible at reading social cues, and therefore have no way of knowing that their male friend who never seems to have a girlfriend and is always there for them, is attracted to them.

    Women who are fuckzoned are entirely deserving of sympathy, simply because they are women. What kind of misogynist wouldn't sympathize with women who get what every man wants, but don't get what they feel they deserve?

    [–] Being friendzoned and fuckzoned are both forms of unrequited love orcscorper 4 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    That's kind of amazing. Casual sex is fine, as long as the guy isn't LTR material. It's like a man who will go on long walks on a moonlit beach with some random skank, but not a woman he sees as his future wife. Probably their favorite thing about being in a relationship is freely given to someone unworthy of a relationship, but withheld from someone you really, wholly like.

    I just can't wrap my head around it. It's like I would draw a bubble bath with lavender bath salts and dozens of tea candles for some chick I don't even like very much, then rub her feet and listen to her complain about that bitch Rebecca at work for two hours, but I'm way too into you for that. I'll cuddle with the neighborhood slut, and pretend I like her mother, but you're too good for those things.

    [–] Cuck with slave mentality is glad to have his wife's boyfriend move-in with them because he thinks it will "strengthen their marriage". orcscorper 4 points ago in WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

    He commented that he fucked his wife's best friend. Most women have a problem with that. That's pretty cool, if it's true. Not as cool as not sharing your marriage bed with your wife's boyfriend, but it's something.

    [–] Florida man climbs through second-floor window of ex-girlfriend's house, tries to kidnap baby daughter, gets gun drawn on him by uncle, drops the kid, gets caught in the swamp by a police K-9 and cries. orcscorper 0 points ago in FloridaMan

    Are you implying women can't be stupid? I believe downvoting a question instead of answering it is a stupid thing to do. I also believe that women are more likely to be offended by the idea that men can have parental rights. Put those two characteristics together, and what have you got? Stupid women.

    [–] WCGW If we hijack this Granny? orcscorper -10 points ago in Whatcouldgowrong

    But who is killing all those white farmers? Who is killing all those black folks? That's what this is really about. Who are the killers?

    [–] WCGW If we hijack this Granny? orcscorper 1 points ago in Whatcouldgowrong

    if my house, wealth, and business were given to me by my father who participated in apartheid and was given to him by his grandpa who colonized I certainly would want to give it back

    The fuck you would. You would find a way to justify to yourself, and others, why you deserve what you have. There is no way you would "give it back". You're full of shit.

    [–] The majority of straight women are sexually submissive (to varying extent by individual), but TRP articulates this poorly and creates unnecessary division/confusion. orcscorper 3 points ago in PurplePillDebate

    This isn't about a man telling a woman to call him "daddy". This story (true or not) is about women wanting to call him daddy. Nobody cares how you would react to some random, hypothetical man telling you to call him "daddy". This is about actual women actually wanting to call their partners "daddy". Who are you to say they shouldn't do that thing?

    [–] What is the best thing one can add to hot chocolate? orcscorper 3 points ago in Cooking

    You have to be conscious when you decide to use peppermint schnapps, but you don't have to be conscious to decide to stop using it.

    [–] Florida man climbs through second-floor window of ex-girlfriend's house, tries to kidnap baby daughter, gets gun drawn on him by uncle, drops the kid, gets caught in the swamp by a police K-9 and cries. orcscorper -5 points ago in FloridaMan

    You are getting a lot of downvotes (probably from stupid women), but your question is completely valid. Short answer: you can't kidnap your own child. It is possible to sign away all parental rights and responsibilities, so that abducting your own biological child is legally no different from a stranger abducting the child.

    "Kidnapping" is a subset of "abducting". "Parental abduction" by a non-custodial parent is possible, but it is not in any way kidnapping.I

    As awful as it is to have your child taken from you illegally, it's really not worse than having your child taken from you legally. There is no substantive difference between a non-custodial parent defying the court and stealing your child, and the court decreeing that you can't see your child because the other parent claimed that you were abusive.

    Everyone who downvoted your question can go fuck themselves with a cactus.

    [–] Florida man climbs through second-floor window of ex-girlfriend's house, tries to kidnap baby daughter, gets gun drawn on him by uncle, drops the kid, gets caught in the swamp by a police K-9 and cries. orcscorper 23 points ago in FloridaMan

    There is some disconnect between the colloquial use of the word "kidnapping", and the legal use. A non-custodial parent can kidnap his child from the custodial parent, as in this case, but it is legally (and morally) light-years away from a stranger abducting a child. If the law recognizes legal parental rights and responsibilities regarding the child, taking the child from the other parent is still illegal, but not "kidnapping".

    On a side note, men who commit "interference of custody", or whatever it's called in your state, are treated much more harshly in the media and the courts than a woman who does the same. It is assumed that a mother should be with her children, so it is seen as righting a wrong when a woman abducts her own child. When a man abducts his child from the mother, he is seen as no better than a child rapist grabbing his next victim. Context is out the window. Children are never placed in a dangerous environment, just because sexist courts assume that the mother is the better parent by default.

    [–] Florida man climbs through second-floor window of ex-girlfriend's house, tries to kidnap baby daughter, gets gun drawn on him by uncle, drops the kid, gets caught in the swamp by a police K-9 and cries. orcscorper 14 points ago in FloridaMan

    Holy shit! I can't imagine a place where criminal defense lawyers lament the fact that criminal defendants don't get executed before they have their day in court. Then again, I have never been to Florida.

    Also, he was admitted into the building by his ex, so no felony burglary. The infant is his daughter, so no felony kidnapping.

    I'm beginning to doubt that you are a lawyer at all. I lift heavy things for a living, and I know more than you. I didn't need another reason to never go to Florida, but now I have one.

    [–] Florida man climbs through second-floor window of ex-girlfriend's house, tries to kidnap baby daughter, gets gun drawn on him by uncle, drops the kid, gets caught in the swamp by a police K-9 and cries. orcscorper 87 points ago in FloridaMan

    This article is terrible. He tried to kidnap "a" 6-month old baby girl, but wasn't charged with kidnapping? He was charged with interference of custody and child neglect, so clearly it should have said "his" baby girl. That's kind of more pertinent information than the name of the dog that chewed on his arm.