Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    the-capitan

    + friends - friends
    126 link karma
    37,936 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] Everyone likes to argue that sexism against men does not exist. I'm a woman and even I know that's not true, considering people say stuff like this. the-capitan 2 points ago in MensRights

    "blaming the victim" is used as a bullshit copout far too much. yes, we should crucify actual sexual predators. but in law, comparative negligence dictates that very rarely is one party fully, 100% liable. "the victim" is often liable some percentage. and even then, when you're the one who pays the price of failure, YOU have the responsibility to yourself to prevent that failure. that's why:

    • you don't go swimming naked in shark infested waters. no one says "the sharks should not have ate the person!" most people won't even go cage diving in shark infested waters.
    • we teach children from a very young age to look both ways before crossing the road. although a driver would be legally liable for hitting a pedestrian, the pedestrian is the one who pays the price of an accident.
    • we tell people not to ride motorcycles and even derogatorily call them organ donors, because even if you don't do stupid shit like wheelies at 170 mph down a crowded highway, "safe" drivers still have huge accident rates and it's the car driver's fault over 60% of the time. the car driver being legally at fault is no consolation if you're paralyzed or dead.
    • very few people want to become soldiers and then get deployed to war. even though it's not your fault, you're going to get shot at and bombs exploded near you. how do you not get shot at and blown up? you don't enlist.
    • when you go scuba diving or sky diving, YOU check your gear even if your instructor/guide checked it. when your gear fails, you're the one who dies, regardless of whose fault it was.

    none of this is blaming the victim. it's empowering that person to make logical and sane choices while letting them keep their agency.

    [–] Why the #MeToo Movement Should Be Ready for a Backlash the-capitan 1 points ago in MGTOW

    look at the shitty roy moore accuser... she forged his autograph, admitted it on video when it was obvious it wasn't going to hold up to legal scrutiny and his threat of a defamation lawsuit was going to force the issue, and they jump to rescue her as "annotating his predatory signature with notes."

    [–] Let’s face it lurkers, 80% of men will go MGTOW eventually the-capitan 1 points ago in MGTOW

    herbivores happened. 60-70% of men are completely checked out from women, MGTOW to the core. late stage rampant hypergamy means women are only going after the top 10-20% of men... while 60-70% are completely checked out. and although japan doesn't have no fault divorce, silent infidelity is rampant. both spouses cheat rampantly and prostitution is semi-legal. married women will regularly go out and blow a guy so they can afford a new dress. the guy says "what am i getting out of this relationship? she just uses my resources, i work my ass to death, and i won't even get kids or sex." guys have to be a special kind of cucked to take that deal.

    technically we'll never reach 80% MGTOW... there will always be some percentage of men who get nothing or get burned, but don't yet realize the only winning move is not to play.

    late stage hypergamy run amok causes a massive decline in birth rates. women basically ride the carousel until their 30s, when they're barren and the men they want don't want them. some will shack up with a beta to divorce rape, often passing off chad's sperm as the beta's. but single motherhood in japan is extremely dishonorable so they don't even do that. in the west, single mothers are poverty factories. western governments have increasingly provided benefits to single mothers because of just how few couples stick together... when in reality they should be requiring any male or female on government benefits to use birth control (IUD or vasalgel when it becomes available).

    women aren't completely stupid though. with more and more guys beginning to understand that divorce rape is real, women's rights groups have even pushed to make cohabitation and "boyfriend/girlfriend" alone grounds for legal divorce benefits. there have been multiple lawsuits in both the US and UK where the couple breaks up and the woman tried to sue the guy for divorce benefits even though they were never married. women are increasingly trying to use common law marriage laws too.

    if you ever cohabit with a woman, even just as roommates, you need a clause in your cohabitation agreement that says:

    • you're not married
    • you don't intend to get married even if one or both of you claim you're married
    • no marriage, including at common law, will be effective without both of you applying for a formal marriage license together.

    [–] 6 year relationship ended because she met a better looking taller and more educated man the-capitan 8 points ago in MGTOW

    people think you're joking. almost every girl i dated who ever did me wrong, whether she cut it off or i did, tried to come back eventually.

    hell, the ex who redpilled the fuck out of me blew up a many-year relationship + engagement to fuck some other guy. they ended up getting married. she started fucking around on him. eventually he found out and divorced her ass.

    it wasn't even a month later that she had looked me up on linked in, made a new email address to email me (because i had blocked all of her other numbers/emails/social).

    [–] [24F] "Why can't I find something long-term? I'm sick and tired of constantly being someone's fling." the-capitan 3 points ago in WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

    as homosapien, women are the keepers of sex; men are the keepers of commitment.

    so it follows that a man who can't get sex even when trading commitment is a loser. a woman who can't get commitment when trading sex is a loser. i'm not sure women were ready for a society where they could so easily be losers and have to pay the price for it with their barren ovaries and childless futures.

    seriously, one of my former plates is now in her early 30s, and she texts me about all this stupid shit, how she can't get a guy. hell, she even dated an unattractive guy with herpes and couldn't keep him.

    [–] Sometimes even Chad makes mistakes. the-capitan 3 points ago in WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

    attractive sure, but she's medically in advanced maternal age. their probability of having healthy children is poor. she's already near 40% probability of fetal loss, birth defect, or risk to her health. whenever this is discussed, women and cucks don't counter that this is false... they shout that aging men have substantially higher rates of bad birthing outcomes than young men... without actually mentioning that the probability of a a young man having a negative birth outcome is already a fraction of 0.001%... and a man 50+ having a negative outcome due to his age alone is still <1%. we're talking orders of magnitude difference. it's fucking hysteria.

    i'm older than him, with a fraction of his SMV. although i'm rich, taller, i look better, and i'm more fit, he's literally royalty. i treat women over 27 as fuck-zone only. there's simply not enough time to court and have healthy children.

    to his benefit though, if she does go to divorce rape him, MI6 will just "drunken car accident" her.

    [–] Sometimes even Chad makes mistakes. the-capitan 5 points ago in WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

    dude's a fucking ginger with a big nose. if he wasn't royalty, he'd be invisible.

    [–] Guys unmatching the-capitan 0 points ago in Bumble

    women are extremely picky in swiping. especially on bumble, a huge percentage of women match and then don't even bother to say "hey"

    on top of that, bumble has a huge amount of inactives, and the filters aren't mutual. this means many of the women we're looking through literally have a 0% probability of sending a message because they haven't used the app in months.

    this all makes it a colossal waste of time for the guy to bother actually looking through profiles. instead, the guy just swipes on everyone, and then ignores everyone who doesn't even start messaging. and it's not even like she lost anything... 99.9% of women open with hey/hi/hello or "how was your weekend/week"

    [–] Why do girls lie about their interest in a second date? the-capitan 1 points ago in Bumble

    which is even more fucking confusing because a girl will sit there and emphatically make out for 3+ minutes, clearly into it, then agree to a date later, and then the day of, cancel + ghost.

    [–] Women are starting to realise that the #MeToo hysteria is backfiring against them the-capitan 2 points ago in pussypassdenied

    What part of what I quoted wasn't true?

    she forged the signature. the "annotation" is his signature and everything after. it's in a different fucking color of ink

    [–] Women are starting to realise that the #MeToo hysteria is backfiring against them the-capitan 3 points ago * (lasted edited 12 hours ago) in pussypassdenied

    snopes is radical left propaganda site. that's not what happened at all. it pure gaslighting. you watch the video and you see what actually happened and it's like "what, did they even describe the same event?"

    the "signature" and "notes" are in a different fucking color of ink from the rest of the message, and that other ink is in a clearly different handwriting. the original picture the media released was shifted into black and white to cover this up. the reason she came out is because they all knew it was fake and moore threatened her with a defamation lawsuit. they both know it's a fraud. allred didn't get any sort of independent analyst... she used her own. moore even offered to pay for one, but she refused.

    her story doesn't even make sense... the lady allegedly was carrying around her yearbook in DECEMBER. yearbooks go out at the end of the school year (may/june), not the end of the calendar year (december). who carries around their yearbook 6-7 months later?

    she copied the DA part from court papers in her divorce erroneously thinking it meant "district attorney" as she was claiming it was his signature from when he was district attorney. but he'd signed thousands of court documents as district attorney, and he never signed DA, even when he was a district attorney. DA is from when his law clerk (as a judge) would sign his name on court documents with authorization -- DA is her initials. that's the only version of roy moore's signature that this fraudster had... which is from when... wait for it... he was the judge in her divorce. he ruled against her. she would have had a slam dunk abuse-of-power case if it were true if she brought it up then. she had every incentive to do so, and still did not.

    it's such horseshit.

    [–] Cut the shit the-capitan 2 points ago in Tinder

    All the bots say that. Except the ones who don't.

    [–] Cut the shit the-capitan 3 points ago in Tinder

    Don't do dinner/movie. Just do literally one drink. When you order, also ask for 2 waters (one for you and one for her). This drastically cuts your costs, and you can meet out a couple girls each night to get your skills back up.

    [–] Not Ken M on gun control the-capitan 3 points ago in NotKenM

    who loads pottery into the clip?

    [–] Feminism central website Cracked fired most of its staff and is close to declaring bankruptcy the-capitan 5 points ago in MGTOW

    old cracked was funny. then their executive editor started writing SJW articles about white male privilege and other radfem bullshit, and they just kept pumping that shit out. turns out SJWs are much louder than their actual size (as a market... not their waistlines), and their ad rates suck because they're all unemployed. it's no surprise that shit doesn't get traffic.

    [–] The Next Phase of #MeToo: Dreamrape the-capitan 58 points ago in MGTOW

    you guys joke... an ex woke me up one morning hitting me. full on girl punches to the face. i wake up and i'm thinking i'm under attack so i flail and she falls out of bed. for the next few days, she was pissed at me because i had cheated on her... in her dream.

    [–] Algorithm question regarding who sees what the-capitan 1 points ago in Bumble

    it depends on your country. big countries like US, CA, AU still have distance filters. small countries don't.

    [–] Straight men of DoT who want kids (and don't have any): What is your upper age limit? Is fertility a concern when evaluating potential partners? the-capitan 1 points ago in datingoverthirty

    look, you just cited a source that says an older father causes increased risk of autism. okay. that's a fact. no one is disputing that. but what is the incidence? these biased sources are quick to say increased risk, but never mention what the actual incidence is. the ones that do admit it's still <1%.

    so seriously, what's the probability of a 25 year old male having a child with autism irrespective of the mother's age?

    now what's the probability of a 40 year old male having a child with autism, irrespective of the mother's age?

    now what's the probability of a 40 year old woman having fetal loss or birth defect, irrespective of the father's age?

    the stats you're talking about are in different galaxies. you're an order of magnitude off.

    [–] Straight men of DoT who want kids (and don't have any): What is your upper age limit? Is fertility a concern when evaluating potential partners? the-capitan 1 points ago * (lasted edited 2 days ago) in datingoverthirty

    i just asked for the actual incidence.

    /u/cranetrain comes back with a study that bitches about the RELATIVE rates, even after i mentioned that those studies which only disclose RELATIVE rates are propaganda.

    this is basic science. i presented a creditworthy source that says advanced maternal age women have 40%+ rates of fetal loss, birth defects, etc. instead of a counter that said this is false, /u/cranetrain went into personal attacks and ridiculous propaganda. not once does that cite a single stat of actual incidence... simply increased risk. back here in reality, incidence is still well under 1%. if you want to get pissy and censor someone for discussing reality, that's cool bro. you're just proving my point about it being propaganda.

    classic sign of actual fascism... no one here has argued what i've said is false. simply that it doesn't follow the narrative. you threatening censorship for not following the narrative is literally fascism. do you support fascism?

    [–] Straight men of DoT who want kids (and don't have any): What is your upper age limit? Is fertility a concern when evaluating potential partners? the-capitan 1 points ago in datingoverthirty

    look, you just cited a source that says an older father causes increased risk of autism. okay. that's a fact. no one is disputing that. but what is the incidence? these pro-fem sources are quick to say increased risk, but never mention what the actual incidence is. the ones that do admit it's still <1%.

    so seriously, what's the probability of a 25 year old male having a child with autism irrespective of the mother's age?

    now what's the probability of a 40 year old male having a child with autism, irrespective of the mother's age?

    now what's the probability of a 40 year old woman having fetal loss or birth defect, irrespective of the father's age?

    the stats you're talking about are in different galaxies. you're an order of magnitude off.

    [–] Straight men of DoT who want kids (and don't have any): What is your upper age limit? Is fertility a concern when evaluating potential partners? the-capitan 2 points ago in datingoverthirty

    this has been debunked repeatedly as biased propaganda. the average male has 200-500 million sperm in a single ejaculation. duds have to swim to the egg and penetrate the outer wall of the egg. they don't. this is why even men who are in their 50s can have a total degredation of 50%+ of their sperm, and the age effects on actual birth defects is still <1%. they talk about increase of risk of these effects, not actual incidence. in contrast, advanced maternal age puts fetal loss and defect at 40%.

    again, not gender equality, but biology doesn't care about fairness.

    [–] Dark times : For some of us, we’re already fucked, don’t be like the rest of us. the-capitan 8 points ago in TheRedPill

    only audio recording is illegal without the consent of all parties and even then that's only in some states.

    and what's she going to do, testify that she commit perjury and filed false police reports by admitting it's her? it's like going to the cops to claim someone stole your cocaine.