Please help contribute to the Reddit categorization project here

    typhonblue

    + friends - friends
    4,271 link karma
    66,829 comment karma
    send message redditor for

    [–] THE BIG ONE: 100K GET typhonblue 5 points ago in KotakuInAction

    How about if you want decent treatment for men and male minorities(they exist, btw)?

    [–] Go home comic girl #comicsgate typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    It's a difficult story because it doesn't have a "soundbite hook." It's about Canadian contract law.

    [–] Go home comic girl #comicsgate typhonblue 3 points ago in KotakuInAction

    The FBI categorically did not come to that conclusion.

    [–] Go home comic girl #comicsgate typhonblue 3 points ago in KotakuInAction

    I've been fighting this fight with no possibility of personal gain for three years now. I went on the kumite to bring attention to this issue and I joked about being a "shill" and then poked fun at the sheer amount of money they were bringing in for superchats.

    They were not amused.

    [–] Go home comic girl #comicsgate typhonblue 2 points ago in KotakuInAction

    If that's true, it's very unfortunate as there is no evidence backing any of the claims against me.

    [–] Why does this sub believe everything that 3rd world feminists say? typhonblue 19 points ago in KotakuInAction

    It's hard to do so when fundamentally societies are made of the dynamic between men's instincts to provide and protect women and women tying those instincts to the "greater work" of a complex society.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 9 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Because all of you are resurrecting a dead thread days after it's no longer relevant.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 5 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Whoever is organizing these raids needs to be more on the ball with their timing.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 3 points ago in KotakuInAction

    It's been funded for a week. Do keep up.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    If you had given me the name of the court case and not even mentioned you were apart of it, I would have never known. Not to mention I'm not going to dox you ffs.

    Since you have such expertise in the area, just find another court case you're not part of that proves your point.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    And the main reason is that you're lying.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 2 points ago in KotakuInAction

    You explained with an example of reserving a judgement for 20 minutes. Then you bow out of citing a court case in which an oral judgement was reserved for 4 weeks when all you have to do is give me the case title and I can look into it myself.

    All judgements are publicly available information in Canada. Anyway I talked to Kopyto, apparently this judgement not being up on CanLii is a live issue and will have to be dealt with.

    Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago * (lasted edited 8 days ago) in KotakuInAction

    What was the case? Because right now you sound like a liar.

    "when reserved the matter will be considered before the judge issues the judgment either in writing or orally."

    Like you said, you have seen an ORAL judgement reserved for a 20 minute recess.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 2 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Dude, thank you! :D I had no plausible mechanism for how this precedent setting judgement didn't end up on CanLii without some sort of ridiculous conspiracy, but you gave me that key piece of evidence I needed when you quoted wikipedia.

    Your silence on this question:

    Have you ever seen a judge take four weeks to write down a decision and then issue it orally? He was literally flipping through pages as he read them.

    Says all that needs to be said.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Well I have to thank you. You got the pieces to fall into place.

    Oral judgments are often provided at the conclusion or a hearing, but not always.

    Yes, when the judge is going to issue a written judgement, oral judgements aren't provided.

    I've had judges "reserve" for 20 minutes before returning to issue an oral decision. I've had judges "reserve" for 6 months to issue a written decision.

    Six months to issue a written decision.

    There is no protocol that says all oral decisions must happen immediately following trial.

    You've just said you saw a judge take a twenty minute recess to return with an oral decision. Your experience is further proof of what I'm saying.

    As the wikipedia article you're basing your info on says, oral decisions are used when the decision needs to be immediate, either due to factors related to the timeliness of the judgement or if the court is overworked and can't afford the time for a written decision.

    Have you ever seen a judge take four weeks to write down a decision and then issue it orally? He was literally flipping through pages as he read them.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    The Judge only said there wasn't sufficient evidence to show that the convention breached its agreement.

    Contract says they will do X, Y, and Z and they did not do them, they even confessed on stand to not doing them because "she was associated with badpeople thus we had every right to breach our contract with her and kick her."

    I believe that the judge is saying that the policies cited in the contract require that some form of investigation take place, and that the Convention use some degree of good faith in reaching their decision.

    They looked at my "associations" and said "she's out." No other investigation took place. Like I said, the Judge has now ruled that people's "associations" justify breaking contracts with them.

    However, I am sure your contract never promised that you would be granted a thorough and impartial process for determining if you broke the convention policies.

    But it did.

    Written decisions get published on CanLii.

    Specifically where are you getting the info that CanLii only publishes written decisions?

    Judges usually only write decisions if the case stands for an important legal precedent, or if the facts/law are particularly complex and they want a comprehensive record of their reasons (to prevent appeals).

    I guess he didn't want to prevent an appeal.

    Also I see you copy-pasted your information from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_(law))

    There's something interesting you missed tho...

    "Oral judgments are often provided at the conclusion of a hearing and are frequently used by courts with heavier caseloads[11]#citenote-11) or where a judgment must be rendered quickly.[[12]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment(law)#cite_note-12)."

    "Written reasons for judgment are not generally provided immediately following the hearing and may take days, weeks, or even months to be released.[14]#cite_note-14)"

    Oral judgements are provided at the conclusion of a hearing, written judgements are provided days or weeks after.

    So... why did the Judge take four weeks to issue an oral judgement when he should have issued the oral judgement at the conclusion of trial? Why break protocol?

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 1 points ago in KotakuInAction

    I don't care if you don't want to donate. But insulting the people who do? Nice.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 10 points ago in KotakuInAction

    You want the story. I joked about "manipulating them into letting me on their stream to shill" when they freaked out about my joke I said it was bantz and then pointed to the 1k they'd brought in on their stream in superchats in the past hour and said "Are you seriously saying you're not doing this for plublicity and money?" Then they went absolutely autistic screeching apeshit and did the internet's biggest "no u."

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 3 points ago * (lasted edited 8 days ago) in KotakuInAction

    How is this not a precedent setting case? The Judge has argued that breaching a contract is acceptable as long as the media doesn't like someone who you are "associated" with.

    Look at: Duke's Cleaning Services Inc v United Cleaning Services Limited, 2018 ABPC 198 (CanLII)

    The issue under contention is whether or not an ambiguous text message constitutes termination notice.

    This is considered an important decision to publish but not the precedent that breaching a contract is now justified in Canada if you're "associated" with people the media doesn't like?

    I can't really cite anything to you because it's such common knowledge .

    That's fascinating logic. What about the official written judgement submitted to the court?

    (iv) any oral reasons for the decision under appeal and for any other ruling that will be an issue on the appeal

    What does this have to do with any of this?

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 11 points ago in KotakuInAction

    If you have evidence of fraud, report it. https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/corporate/security/protect-yourself-against-fraud.html

    If you don't then kindly stop smearing my name over unsubstantiated bullshit.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 6 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Sudden interest in this thread that has rolled off the front page of KiA. Hmmm...

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 8 points ago in KotakuInAction

    Please cite where you're getting your information.

    [–] Honey Badger Lawsuit Appeal typhonblue 6 points ago in KotakuInAction

    I'm not talking about the trial transcripts.